243 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24595342)
1. A nonlinear biomechanical model based registration method for aligning prone and supine MR breast images.
Han L; Hipwell JH; Eiben B; Barratt D; Modat M; Ourselin S; Hawkes DJ
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2014 Mar; 33(3):682-94. PubMed ID: 24595342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Realization of a biomechanical model-assisted image guidance system for breast cancer surgery using supine MRI.
Conley RH; Meszoely IM; Weis JA; Pheiffer TS; Arlinghaus LR; Yankeelov TE; Miga MI
Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2015 Dec; 10(12):1985-96. PubMed ID: 26092657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Development of patient-specific biomechanical models for predicting large breast deformation.
Han L; Hipwell JH; Tanner C; Taylor Z; Mertzanidou T; Cardoso J; Ourselin S; Hawkes DJ
Phys Med Biol; 2012 Jan; 57(2):455-72. PubMed ID: 22173131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Computerized method for nonrigid MR-to-PET breast-image registration.
Unlu MZ; Krol A; Magri A; Mandel JA; Lee W; Baum KG; Lipson ED; Coman IL; Feiglin DH
Comput Biol Med; 2010 Jan; 40(1):37-53. PubMed ID: 19942214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Breast lesion co-localisation between X-ray and MR images using finite element modelling.
Lee AW; Rajagopal V; Babarenda Gamage TP; Doyle AJ; Nielsen PM; Nash MP
Med Image Anal; 2013 Dec; 17(8):1256-64. PubMed ID: 23860392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Validation of nonrigid image registration using finite-element methods: application to breast MR images.
Schnabel JA; Tanner C; Castellano-Smith AD; Degenhard A; Leach MO; Hose DR; Hill DL; Hawkes DJ
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2003 Feb; 22(2):238-47. PubMed ID: 12716000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Using surface markers for MRI guided breast conserving surgery: a feasibility survey.
Ebrahimi M; Siegler P; Modhafar A; Holloway CM; Plewes DB; Martel AL
Phys Med Biol; 2014 Apr; 59(7):1589-605. PubMed ID: 24614540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Symmetric Biomechanically Guided Prone-to-Supine Breast Image Registration.
Eiben B; Vavourakis V; Hipwell JH; Kabus S; Buelow T; Lorenz C; Mertzanidou T; Reis S; Williams NR; Keshtgar M; Hawkes DJ
Ann Biomed Eng; 2016 Jan; 44(1):154-73. PubMed ID: 26577254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Biomechanical 3-D finite element modeling of the human breast using MRI data.
Samani A; Bishop J; Yaffe MJ; Plewes DB
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2001 Apr; 20(4):271-9. PubMed ID: 11370894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Deformable mapping technique to correlate lesions in digital breast tomosynthesis and automated breast ultrasound images.
Green CA; Goodsitt MM; Brock KK; Davis CL; Larson ED; Lau JH; Carson PL
Med Phys; 2018 Oct; 45(10):4402-4417. PubMed ID: 30066340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Large breast compressions: observations and evaluation of simulations.
Tanner C; White M; Guarino S; Hall-Craggs MA; Douek M; Hawkes DJ
Med Phys; 2011 Feb; 38(2):682-90. PubMed ID: 21452705
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation of three-dimensional finite element-based deformable registration of pre- and intraoperative prostate imaging.
Bharatha A; Hirose M; Hata N; Warfield SK; Ferrant M; Zou KH; Suarez-Santana E; Ruiz-Alzola J; D'Amico A; Cormack RA; Kikinis R; Jolesz FA; Tempany CM
Med Phys; 2001 Dec; 28(12):2551-60. PubMed ID: 11797960
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Registration of MR prostate images with biomechanical modeling and nonlinear parameter estimation.
Alterovitz R; Goldberg K; Pouliot J; Hsu IC; Kim Y; Noworolski SM; Kurhanewicz J
Med Phys; 2006 Feb; 33(2):446-54. PubMed ID: 16532952
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Biomechanical modeling of the human head for physically based, nonrigid image registration.
Hagemann A; Rohr K; Stiehl HS; Spetzger U; Gilsbach JM
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 1999 Oct; 18(10):875-84. PubMed ID: 10628947
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Volume-preserving nonrigid registration of MR breast images using free-form deformation with an incompressibility constraint.
Rohlfing T; Maurer CR; Bluemke DA; Jacobs MA
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2003 Jun; 22(6):730-41. PubMed ID: 12872948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A complete software application for automatic registration of x-ray mammography and magnetic resonance images.
Solves-Llorens JA; Rupérez MJ; Monserrat C; Feliu E; García M; Lloret M
Med Phys; 2014 Aug; 41(8):081903. PubMed ID: 25086534
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. MRI to X-ray mammography intensity-based registration with simultaneous optimisation of pose and biomechanical transformation parameters.
Mertzanidou T; Hipwell J; Johnsen S; Han L; Eiben B; Taylor Z; Ourselin S; Huisman H; Mann R; Bick U; Karssemeijer N; Hawkes D
Med Image Anal; 2014 May; 18(4):674-83. PubMed ID: 24727358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Supine breast MRI.
Siegler P; Holloway CM; Causer P; Thevathasan G; Plewes DB
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2011 Nov; 34(5):1212-7. PubMed ID: 21928381
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Supine magnetic resonance image registration for breast surgery: insights on material mechanics.
Ringel MJ; Richey WL; Heiselman JS; Luo M; Meszoely IM; Miga MI
J Med Imaging (Bellingham); 2022 Nov; 9(6):065001. PubMed ID: 36388143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A biomechanical breast model evaluated with respect to MRI data collected in three different positions.
Mîra A; Carton AK; Muller S; Payan Y
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2018 Dec; 60():191-199. PubMed ID: 30408760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
