438 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24596276)
1. Associations between formative practice quizzes and summative examination outcomes in a medical anatomy course.
McNulty JA; Espiritu BR; Hoyt AE; Ensminger DC; Chandrasekhar AJ
Anat Sci Educ; 2015; 8(1):37-44. PubMed ID: 24596276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. To quiz or not to quiz: Formative tests help detect students at risk of failing the clinical anatomy course.
Azzi AJ; Ramnanan CJ; Smith J; Dionne É; Jalali A
Anat Sci Educ; 2015; 8(5):413-20. PubMed ID: 25227111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Online feedback assessments in physiology: effects on students' learning experiences and outcomes.
Marden NY; Ulman LG; Wilson FS; Velan GM
Adv Physiol Educ; 2013 Jun; 37(2):192-200. PubMed ID: 23728137
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluating dissection in the gross anatomy course: Correlation between quality of laboratory dissection and students outcomes.
Nwachukwu C; Lachman N; Pawlina W
Anat Sci Educ; 2015; 8(1):45-52. PubMed ID: 24799441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Online quizzes promote inconsistent improvements on in-class test performance in introductory anatomy and physiology.
Brown GA; Bice MR; Shaw BS; Shaw I
Adv Physiol Educ; 2015 Jun; 39(2):63-6. PubMed ID: 26031720
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The educational value of online mastery quizzes in a human anatomy course for first-year dental students.
Lee LM; Nagel RW; Gould DJ
J Dent Educ; 2012 Sep; 76(9):1195-9. PubMed ID: 22942415
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Summative and Formative Style Anatomy Practical Examinations: Do They Have Impact on Students' Performance and Drive for Learning?
Mogali SR; Rotgans JI; Rosby L; Ferenczi MA; Low Beer N
Anat Sci Educ; 2020 Sep; 13(5):581-590. PubMed ID: 31733172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effect of online formative assessment on summative performance in integrated musculoskeletal system module.
Mitra NK; Barua A
BMC Med Educ; 2015 Mar; 15():29. PubMed ID: 25884641
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Utilizing Medical Students as Internal Assets to Enhance Gross Anatomy Laboratory Learning.
Williams SE; Hawkins HG; Khalil MK
Clin Anat; 2020 Mar; 33(2):286-292. PubMed ID: 31688953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. MEDICOL: online learning in medicine and dentistry.
Broudo M; Walsh C
Acad Med; 2002 Sep; 77(9):926-7. PubMed ID: 12228095
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The integration of an anatomy massive open online course (MOOC) into a medical anatomy curriculum.
Swinnerton BJ; Morris NP; Hotchkiss S; Pickering JD
Anat Sci Educ; 2017 Jan; 10(1):53-67. PubMed ID: 27315160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Quizzing for success: Evaluation of the impact of feedback quizzes on the experiences and academic performance of undergraduate students in two clinical pharmacokinetics courses.
Hennig S; Staatz CE; Bond JA; Leung D; Singleton J
Curr Pharm Teach Learn; 2019 Jul; 11(7):742-749. PubMed ID: 31227099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Impact and educational outcomes of a small group self-directed teaching strategy in a clinical neuroscience curriculum.
Nathaniel TI; Gainey JC; Williams JA; Stewart BL; Hood MC; Brechtel LE; Faulkner RV; Pendergrass JS; Black LA; Griffin SK; Troup CE; Reuben JS; Black AC
Anat Sci Educ; 2018 Sep; 11(5):478-487. PubMed ID: 29251834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Use of digital teaching resources and predictors of medical student performance during the pandemic: A prospective study.
Seer M; Kampsen C; Becker T; Hobert S; Anders S; Raupach T
PLoS One; 2022; 17(5):e0268331. PubMed ID: 35544546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The use of formative online quizzes to enhance class preparation and scores on summative exams.
Dobson JL
Adv Physiol Educ; 2008 Dec; 32(4):297-302. PubMed ID: 19047506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Use of unsupervised online quizzes as formative assessment in a medical physiology course: effects of incentives on student participation and performance.
Kibble J
Adv Physiol Educ; 2007 Sep; 31(3):253-60. PubMed ID: 17848591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparative efficacy of group and individual feedback in gross anatomy for promoting medical student professionalism.
Camp CL; Gregory JK; Lachman N; Chen LP; Juskewitch JE; Pawlina W
Anat Sci Educ; 2010; 3(2):64-72. PubMed ID: 20213851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Understanding factors affecting participation in online formative quizzes: an interview study.
Abney AJ; Amin S; Kibble JD
Adv Physiol Educ; 2017 Sep; 41(3):457-463. PubMed ID: 28743691
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Weekly quizzes in extended-matching format as a means of monitoring students' progress in gross anatomy.
Lukić IK; Gluncić V; Katavić V; Petanjek Z; Jalsovec D; Marusić A
Ann Anat; 2001 Nov; 183(6):575-9. PubMed ID: 11766531
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Student performance on practical gross anatomy examinations is not affected by assessment modality.
Meyer AJ; Innes SI; Stomski NJ; Armson AJ
Anat Sci Educ; 2016; 9(2):111-20. PubMed ID: 25981194
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
