736 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24596377)
1. Identification of patients with node-negative, triple-negative breast cancer who benefit from adjuvant cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and 5-fluorouracil chemotherapy.
Wu CE; Chen SC; Lin YC; Lo YF; Hsueh S; Chang HK
Anticancer Res; 2014 Mar; 34(3):1301-6. PubMed ID: 24596377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [A retrospective study of tegafur/uracil compared with cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil as adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with node-negative, triple-negative breast cancer].
Fushimi K; Tanabe N; Takami M
Gan To Kagaku Ryoho; 2014 Apr; 41(4):449-53. PubMed ID: 24743359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Identifying good prognosis group of breast cancer patients with 1-3 positive axillary nodes for adjuvant cyclophosphamide, methotrexate and 5-fluorouracil (CMF) chemotherapy.
Lin YC; Chen SC; Chang HK; Hsueh S; Tsai CS; Lo YF; Hwang TL; Chen MF
Jpn J Clin Oncol; 2005 Sep; 35(9):514-9. PubMed ID: 16199422
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Natural history of more than 20 years of node-positive primary breast carcinoma treated with cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil-based adjuvant chemotherapy: a study by the Cancer and Leukemia Group B.
Weiss RB; Woolf SH; Demakos E; Holland JF; Berry DA; Falkson G; Cirrincione CT; Robbins A; Bothun S; Henderson IC; Norton L;
J Clin Oncol; 2003 May; 21(9):1825-35. PubMed ID: 12721260
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Postoperative radiotherapy in high-risk premenopausal women with breast cancer who receive adjuvant chemotherapy. Danish Breast Cancer Cooperative Group 82b Trial.
Overgaard M; Hansen PS; Overgaard J; Rose C; Andersson M; Bach F; Kjaer M; Gadeberg CC; Mouridsen HT; Jensen MB; Zedeler K
N Engl J Med; 1997 Oct; 337(14):949-55. PubMed ID: 9395428
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Treatment of axillary lymph node-negative, estrogen receptor-negative breast cancer: updated findings from National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project clinical trials.
Fisher B; Jeong JH; Anderson S; Wolmark N
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2004 Dec; 96(24):1823-31. PubMed ID: 15601638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Prognostic value of extracapsular tumor spread for locoregional control in premenopausal patients with node-positive breast cancer treated with classical cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil: long-term observations from International Breast Cancer Study Group Trial VI.
Gruber G; Bonetti M; Nasi ML; Price KN; Castiglione-Gertsch M; Rudenstam CM; Holmberg SB; Lindtner J; Golouh R; Collins J; Crivellari D; Carbone A; Thürlimann B; Simoncini E; Fey MF; Gelber RD; Coates AS; Goldhirsch A;
J Clin Oncol; 2005 Oct; 23(28):7089-97. PubMed ID: 16192592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Sequential methotrexate and fluorouracil for the treatment of node-negative breast cancer patients with estrogen receptor-negative tumors: eight-year results from National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project (NSABP) B-13 and first report of findings from NSABP B-19 comparing methotrexate and fluorouracil with conventional cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil.
Fisher B; Dignam J; Mamounas EP; Costantino JP; Wickerham DL; Redmond C; Wolmark N; Dimitrov NV; Bowman DM; Glass AG; Atkins JN; Abramson N; Sutherland CM; Aron BS; Margolese RG
J Clin Oncol; 1996 Jul; 14(7):1982-92. PubMed ID: 8683228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Adjuvant CMF for node-negative and estrogen receptor-negative breast cancer patients.
Zambetti M; Bonadonna G; Valagussa P; Daidone MG; Coradini D; Bignami P; Contesso G; Silvestrini R
J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr; 1992; (11):77-83. PubMed ID: 1627434
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Meta-analysis of adjuvant cyclophosphamide/methotrexate/5-fluorouracil chemotherapy in postmenopausal women with estrogen receptor-positive, node-positive breast cancer.
Hartman AR; Fleming GF; Dillon JJ
Clin Breast Cancer; 2001 Jul; 2(2):138-43; discussion 144. PubMed ID: 11899785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A comparison of the outcomes of non-randomised chemotherapy regimens in node positive breast cancer.
Kuru B; Camlibel M; Dinc S; Gulcelik MA; Atalay C; Alagol H
J Exp Clin Cancer Res; 2005 Sep; 24(3):363-72. PubMed ID: 16270522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Randomized phase III trial of adjuvant epirubicin followed by cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and 5-fluorouracil (CMF) versus CMF followed by epirubicin in patients with node-negative or 1-3 node-positive rapidly proliferating breast cancer.
Amadori D; Silvestrini R; De Lena M; Boccardo F; Rocca A; Scarpi E; Schittulli F; Brandi M; Maltoni R; Serra P; Ponzone R; Biglia N; Gianni L; Tienghi A; Valerio MR; Bonginelli P; Amaducci L; Faedi M; Baldini E; Paradiso A
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2011 Feb; 125(3):775-84. PubMed ID: 21132360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Sixteen years follow-up results of a randomized phase II trial of neoadjuvant fluorouracil, doxorubicin, and cyclophosphamide (FAC) compared with cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and 5-fluorouracil (CMF) in stage III breast cancer: GOCS experience.
Leone JP; Leone J; Vallejo CT; Pérez JE; Romero AO; Machiavelli MR; Romero Acuña L; Domínguez ME; Langui M; Fasce HM; Leone BA; Ortiz E; Iturbe J; Zwenger AO
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2014 Jan; 143(2):313-23. PubMed ID: 24327333
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Ten-year analysis of the prospective multicentre Chemo-N0 trial validates American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)-recommended biomarkers uPA and PAI-1 for therapy decision making in node-negative breast cancer patients.
Harbeck N; Schmitt M; Meisner C; Friedel C; Untch M; Schmidt M; Sweep CG; Lisboa BW; Lux MP; Beck T; Hasmüller S; Kiechle M; Jänicke F; Thomssen C;
Eur J Cancer; 2013 May; 49(8):1825-35. PubMed ID: 23490655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Oral uracil and tegafur compared with classic cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, fluorouracil as postoperative chemotherapy in patients with node-negative, high-risk breast cancer: National Surgical Adjuvant Study for Breast Cancer 01 Trial.
Watanabe T; Sano M; Takashima S; Kitaya T; Tokuda Y; Yoshimoto M; Kohno N; Nakagami K; Iwata H; Shimozuma K; Sonoo H; Tsuda H; Sakamoto G; Ohashi Y
J Clin Oncol; 2009 Mar; 27(9):1368-74. PubMed ID: 19204202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Adjuvant treatment for early breast cancer: the Ludwig breast cancer studies.
Goldhirsch A; Gelber R
NCI Monogr; 1986; (1):55-70. PubMed ID: 3774016
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. One year of adjuvant tamoxifen compared with chemotherapy and tamoxifen in postmenopausal patients with stage II breast cancer.
Ejlertsen B; Jensen MB; Elversang J; Rasmussen BB; Andersson M; Andersen J; Nielsen DL; Cold S; Mouridsen HT
Eur J Cancer; 2013 Sep; 49(14):2986-94. PubMed ID: 23756360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Endocrine responsiveness and tailoring adjuvant therapy for postmenopausal lymph node-negative breast cancer: a randomized trial.
International Breast Cancer Study Group (IBCSG)
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2002 Jul; 94(14):1054-65. PubMed ID: 12122096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Expression of bcl-2 protein predicts efficacy of adjuvant treatments in operable node-positive breast cancer.
Gasparini G; Barbareschi M; Doglioni C; Palma PD; Mauri FA; Boracchi P; Bevilacqua P; Caffo O; Morelli L; Verderio P
Clin Cancer Res; 1995 Feb; 1(2):189-98. PubMed ID: 9815973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Adjuvant cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil in premonopausal patients with node-positive breast cancer: indirect comparison of dose and schedule in DBCG trials 77, 82, and 89.
Ejlertsen B; Mouridsen HT; Jensen MB
Acta Oncol; 2008; 47(4):662-71. PubMed ID: 18465334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]