181 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24596785)
1. Comparison of the effect of implant abutment surface modifications on retention of implant-supported restoration with a polymer based cement.
Sahu N; Lakshmi N; Azhagarasan NS; Agnihotri Y; Rajan M; Hariharan R
J Clin Diagn Res; 2014 Jan; 8(1):239-42. PubMed ID: 24596785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The comparison of provisional luting agents and abutment surface roughness on the retention of provisional implant-supported crowns.
Kim Y; Yamashita J; Shotwell JL; Chong KH; Wang HL
J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Jun; 95(6):450-5. PubMed ID: 16765158
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Geometry of Implant Abutment Surface Improving Cement Effectiveness: An
Rathod A; Jalaluddin M; Shrinivas ; Devadiga TJ; Jha S; Alzahrani KM
J Pharm Bioallied Sci; 2021 Nov; 13(Suppl 2):S1093-S1097. PubMed ID: 35017936
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Influence of abutment height and surface roughness on in vitro retention of three luting agents.
Cano-Batalla J; Soliva-Garriga J; Campillo-Funollet M; Munoz-Viveros CA; Giner-Tarrida L
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2012; 27(1):36-41. PubMed ID: 22299076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Retention of CAD/CAM all-ceramic crowns on prefabricated implant abutments: an in vitro comparative study of luting agents and abutment surface area.
Carnaggio TV; Conrad R; Engelmeier RL; Gerngross P; Paravina R; Perezous L; Powers JM
J Prosthodont; 2012 Oct; 21(7):523-8. PubMed ID: 22469271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effect of abutment modification and cement type on retention of cement-retained implant supported crowns.
Farzin M; Torabi K; Ahangari AH; Derafshi R
J Dent (Tehran); 2014 May; 11(3):256-62. PubMed ID: 25628660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The effect of air abrasion of metal implant abutments on the tensile bond strength of three luting agents used to cement implant superstructures: an in vitro study.
Jugdev J; Borzabadi-Farahani A; Lynch E
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2014; 29(4):784-90. PubMed ID: 25032757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The influence of implant abutment surface roughness and the type of cement on retention of implant supported crowns.
Reddy SV; Reddy MS; Reddy CR; Pithani P; R SK; Kulkarni G
J Clin Diagn Res; 2015 Mar; 9(3):ZC05-7. PubMed ID: 25954694
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluation of change in implant abutment after teeth surface modifications.
Mishra K; Singh P; Noorani MK; Adarsh K; Kalburgi MN; Mallik M
Bioinformation; 2021; 17(1):157-161. PubMed ID: 34393431
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effect of Surface Modifications on the Retention of Implant-supported Cement-retained Crowns with Short Abutments: An
Kalla K; Arunachalam S; Behera SSP; Konchada J; Lankapalli S; Vanisetti L
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2021 Dec; 22(12):1451-1456. PubMed ID: 35656686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. An in vitro assessment of circumferential grooves on the retention of cement-retained implant-supported crowns.
Lewinstein I; Block L; Lehr Z; Ormianer Z; Matalon S
J Prosthet Dent; 2011 Dec; 106(6):367-72. PubMed ID: 22133393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effects of surface conditioning on the retentiveness of titanium crowns over short implant abutments.
Sadig WM; Al Harbi MW
Implant Dent; 2007 Dec; 16(4):387-96. PubMed ID: 18091167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparative evaluation of casting retention using the ITI solid abutment with six cements.
Mansour A; Ercoli C; Graser G; Tallents R; Moss M
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2002 Aug; 13(4):343-8. PubMed ID: 12175370
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The effect of thermal cycling and air abrasion on cement failure loads of 4 provisional luting agents used for the cementation of implant-supported fixed partial dentures.
Michalakis K; Pissiotis AL; Kang K; Hirayama H; Garefis PD; Petridis H
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(4):569-74. PubMed ID: 17929517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Cement selection for implant-supported crowns fabricated with different luting space settings.
Gultekin P; Gultekin BA; Aydin M; Yalcin S
J Prosthodont; 2013 Feb; 22(2):112-9. PubMed ID: 23387964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A comparison of retentive strength of implant cement depending on various methods of removing provisional cement from implant abutment.
Keum EC; Shin SY
J Adv Prosthodont; 2013 Aug; 5(3):234-40. PubMed ID: 24049563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The Effect of Compressive Cyclic Loading on the Retention of Cast Single Crowns Cemented to Implant Abutments.
Alvarez-Arenal A; Gonzalez-Gonzalez I; Pinés-Hueso J; deLlanos-Lanchares H; del Rio Highsmith J
Int J Prosthodont; 2016; 29(1):80-2. PubMed ID: 26757336
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effect of modifying the screw access channels of zirconia implant abutment on the cement flow pattern and retention of zirconia restorations.
Wadhwani C; Chung KH
J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Jul; 112(1):45-50. PubMed ID: 24680357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of Oxygen Plasma Treatment and Sandblasting of Titanium Implant-Abutment Surface on Bond Strength and Surface Topography.
El-Helbawy NG; El-Hatery AA; Ahmed MH
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2016; 31(3):555-62. PubMed ID: 27183064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Influence of margin location and luting material on the amount of undetected cement excess on CAD/CAM implant abutments and cement-retained zirconia crowns: an in-vitro study.
Gehrke P; Bleuel K; Fischer C; Sader R
BMC Oral Health; 2019 Jun; 19(1):111. PubMed ID: 31200680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
