These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24597420)

  • 1. Surrogates and extra-familial interests.
    Baergen R; Woodhouse W
    J Clin Ethics; 2013; 24(4):332-7. PubMed ID: 24597420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Familiar interests and strange analogies: Baergen and Woodhouse on extra-familial interests.
    Nelson JL
    J Clin Ethics; 2013; 24(4):338-42. PubMed ID: 24597421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Counterfactual reasoning in surrogate decision making -- another look.
    Johansson M; Broström L
    Bioethics; 2011 Jun; 25(5):244-9. PubMed ID: 19874290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Substituted judgments in the absence of surrogates.
    Sadovnikoff N; Jurchak M
    Crit Care Med; 2007 Oct; 35(10):2467-8. PubMed ID: 17885404
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A new standard for incapacitated patient decision making: the clinical standard of surrogate empowerment.
    Tunzi M
    J Clin Ethics; 2012; 23(4):316-30. PubMed ID: 23469692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Surrogate medical decision making on behalf of a never-competent, profoundly intellectually disabled patient who is acutely ill.
    Venkat A
    J Clin Ethics; 2012; 23(1):71-8. PubMed ID: 22462387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The Role of a Hospital Ethics Consultation Service in Decision-Making for Unrepresented Patients.
    Courtwright AM; Abrams J; Robinson EM
    J Bioeth Inq; 2017 Jun; 14(2):241-250. PubMed ID: 28265798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Surrogate decision-making: judgment standard preferences of older adults.
    Moore CD; Sparr J; Sherman S; Avery L
    Soc Work Health Care; 2003; 37(2):1-16. PubMed ID: 12959484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Deciding for others.
    Buchanan A; Brock DW
    Milbank Q; 1986; 64(Suppl. 2):17-94. PubMed ID: 11649884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Substituted consent: from lunatics to corpses.
    Mendelson D
    J Law Med; 2007 May; 14(4):449-62. PubMed ID: 17571779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Clinical ethics consultations: reasons for optimism, but problems exist.
    Perkins HS
    J Clin Ethics; 1992; 3(2):133-7. PubMed ID: 11643065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. What families say about surrogacy: a response to "autonomy and the family as (in)appropriate surrogates for DNR decisions".
    Nelson JL; Lindemann H
    J Clin Ethics; 2007; 18(3):219-26; discussion 233-4. PubMed ID: 18051938
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Autonomy and the family as (in)appropriate surrogates for DNR decisions: a qualitative analysis of dying cancer patients' talk.
    Eliott J; Olver I
    J Clin Ethics; 2007; 18(3):206-18. PubMed ID: 18051937
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Health care surrogate statutes: ethics pitfalls threaten the interests of incompetent patients.
    Krupp AN
    West VA Law Rev; 1998; 101(1):99-128. PubMed ID: 12774805
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Surrogate decision making. Who will make decisions for me when I can't?
    High DM
    Clin Geriatr Med; 1994 Aug; 10(3):445-62. PubMed ID: 7982161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Making treatment decisions for oneself: weighing the value.
    Brock DW; Park JK; Wendler D
    Hastings Cent Rep; 2014; 44(2):22-5. PubMed ID: 24634044
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Decisions to limit life-sustaining treatment for critically ill patients who lack both decision-making capacity and surrogate decision-makers.
    White DB; Curtis JR; Lo B; Luce JM
    Crit Care Med; 2006 Aug; 34(8):2053-9. PubMed ID: 16763515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Moving toward consultation: what are the limitations of ethics comittees?
    Issues (St Louis Mo); 1990; 5(6):1-7. PubMed ID: 11654896
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Empirical fallacies in the debate on substituted judgment.
    Johansson M; Broström L
    Health Care Anal; 2014 Mar; 22(1):73-81. PubMed ID: 22367526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Anticruelty care: commentary.
    Braithwaite SS
    J Clin Ethics; 1991; 2(2):97-103. PubMed ID: 11642931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.