118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24597517)
1. Reducing decision errors in the paired comparison of the diagnostic accuracy of screening tests with Gaussian outcomes.
Ringham BM; Alonzo TA; Brinton JT; Kreidler SM; Munjal A; Muller KE; Glueck DH
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2014 Mar; 14():37. PubMed ID: 24597517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Bias in trials comparing paired continuous tests can cause researchers to choose the wrong screening modality.
Glueck DH; Lamb MM; O'Donnell CI; Ringham BM; Brinton JT; Muller KE; Lewin JM; Alonzo TA; Pisano ED
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2009 Jan; 9():4. PubMed ID: 19154609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Bias in estimating accuracy of a binary screening test with differential disease verification.
Alonzo TA; Brinton JT; Ringham BM; Glueck DH
Stat Med; 2011 Jul; 30(15):1852-64. PubMed ID: 21495059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. An internal pilot design for prospective cancer screening trials with unknown disease prevalence.
Brinton JT; Ringham BM; Glueck DH
Trials; 2015 Oct; 16():458. PubMed ID: 26463684
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Thoracic imaging tests for the diagnosis of COVID-19.
Islam N; Salameh JP; Leeflang MM; Hooft L; McGrath TA; van der Pol CB; Frank RA; Kazi S; Prager R; Hare SS; Dennie C; Spijker R; Deeks JJ; Dinnes J; Jenniskens K; Korevaar DA; Cohen JF; Van den Bruel A; Takwoingi Y; van de Wijgert J; Wang J; McInnes MD;
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2020 Nov; 11():CD013639. PubMed ID: 33242342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Adjusting for verification bias in diagnostic accuracy measures when comparing multiple screening tests - an application to the IP1-PROSTAGRAM study.
Day E; Eldred-Evans D; Prevost AT; Ahmed HU; Fiorentino F
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2022 Mar; 22(1):70. PubMed ID: 35300611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Bayesian ROC curve estimation under verification bias.
Gu J; Ghosal S; Kleiner DE
Stat Med; 2014 Dec; 33(29):5081-96. PubMed ID: 25269427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Smooth non-parametric receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves for continuous diagnostic tests.
Zou KH; Hall WJ; Shapiro DE
Stat Med; 1997 Oct; 16(19):2143-56. PubMed ID: 9330425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. COMPROC and CHECKNORM: computer programs for comparing accuracies of diagnostic tests using ROC curves in the presence of verification bias.
Zhou XH; Higgs RE
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 1998 Nov; 57(3):179-86. PubMed ID: 9822855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. An ROC-type measure of diagnostic accuracy when the gold standard is continuous-scale.
Obuchowski NA
Stat Med; 2006 Feb; 25(3):481-93. PubMed ID: 16287217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Meta-analysis of diagnostic tests with imperfect reference standards.
Walter SD; Irwig L; Glasziou PP
J Clin Epidemiol; 1999 Oct; 52(10):943-51. PubMed ID: 10513757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Diagnostic test accuracy of nutritional tools used to identify undernutrition in patients with colorectal cancer: a systematic review.
Håkonsen SJ; Pedersen PU; Bath-Hextall F; Kirkpatrick P
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep; 2015 May; 13(4):141-87. PubMed ID: 26447079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A comparison of parametric and nonparametric approaches to ROC analysis of quantitative diagnostic tests.
Hajian-Tilaki KO; Hanley JA; Joseph L; Collet JP
Med Decis Making; 1997; 17(1):94-102. PubMed ID: 8994156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Estimates of sensitivity and specificity can be biased when reporting the results of the second test in a screening trial conducted in series.
Ringham BM; Alonzo TA; Grunwald GK; Glueck DH
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2010 Jan; 10():3. PubMed ID: 20064254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparing correlated areas under the ROC curves of two diagnostic tests in the presence of verification bias.
Zhou XH
Biometrics; 1998 Jun; 54(2):453-70. PubMed ID: 9629639
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Nonparametric estimation of ROC curves in the absence of a gold standard.
Zhou XH; Castelluccio P; Zhou C
Biometrics; 2005 Jun; 61(2):600-9. PubMed ID: 16011710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A new method to address verification bias in studies of clinical screening tests: cervical cancer screening assays as an example.
Xue X; Kim MY; Castle PE; Strickler HD
J Clin Epidemiol; 2014 Mar; 67(3):343-53. PubMed ID: 24332397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Estimation of the ROC curve under verification bias.
Fluss R; Reiser B; Faraggi D; Rotnitzky A
Biom J; 2009 Jun; 51(3):475-90. PubMed ID: 19588455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A nonparametric maximum likelihood estimator for the receiver operating characteristic curve area in the presence of verification bias.
Zhou XH
Biometrics; 1996 Mar; 52(1):299-305. PubMed ID: 8934599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
