475 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24597920)
1. Inter- and intra-observer agreement of non-reassuring cardiotocography analysis and subsequent clinical management.
Rhöse S; Heinis AM; Vandenbussche F; van Drongelen J; van Dillen J
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2014 Jun; 93(6):596-602. PubMed ID: 24597920
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Inter- and intra-observer agreement of intrapartum ST analysis of the fetal electrocardiogram in women monitored by STAN.
Westerhuis ME; van Horen E; Kwee A; van der Tweel I; Visser GH; Moons KG
BJOG; 2009 Mar; 116(4):545-51. PubMed ID: 19250366
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Midwives' visual interpretation of intrapartum cardiotocographs: intra- and inter-observer agreement.
Devane D; Lalor J
J Adv Nurs; 2005 Oct; 52(2):133-41. PubMed ID: 16164474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Interobserver agreement in the assessment of intrapartum automated fetal electrocardiography in singleton pregnancies.
Ojala K; Mäkikallio K; Haapsamo M; Ijäs H; Tekay A
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2008; 87(5):536-40. PubMed ID: 18446537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Inter-observer agreement in clinical decision-making for abnormal cardiotocogram (CTG) during labour: a comparison between CTG and CTG plus STAN.
Vayssière C; Tsatsaris V; Pirrello O; Cristini C; Arnaud C; Goffinet F
BJOG; 2009 Jul; 116(8):1081-7; discussion 1087-8. PubMed ID: 19515149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Cardiotocography as a predictor of fetal outcome in women presenting with reduced fetal movement.
Daly N; Brennan D; Foley M; O'Herlihy C
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2011 Nov; 159(1):57-61. PubMed ID: 21899943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Inter-observer variation in assessment of 845 labour admission tests: comparison between midwives and obstetricians in the clinical setting and two experts.
Blix E; Sviggum O; Koss KS; Øian P
BJOG; 2003 Jan; 110(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 12504927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Intrapartum cardiotocography -- the dilemma of interpretational variation.
Palomäki O; Luukkaala T; Luoto R; Tuimala R
J Perinat Med; 2006; 34(4):298-302. PubMed ID: 16856819
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Fetal heart rate patterns and ECG ST segment changes preceding metabolic acidaemia at birth.
Amer-Wåhlin I; Ingemarsson I; Marsal K; Herbst A
BJOG; 2005 Feb; 112(2):160-5. PubMed ID: 15663579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Continuous cardiotocography during labour: Analysis, classification and management.
Pinas A; Chandraharan E
Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol; 2016 Jan; 30():33-47. PubMed ID: 26165747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Prediction of fetal base excess values at birth using an algorithm to interpret fetal heart rate tracings: a retrospective validation.
Uccella S; Cromi A; Colombo G; Agosti M; Bogani G; Casarin J; Ghezzi F
BJOG; 2012 Dec; 119(13):1657-64. PubMed ID: 23061674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Fetal pulse oximetry and wavelet analysis of the fetal heart rate in the evaluation of abnormal cardiotocography tracings.
Salamalekis E; Siristatidis C; Vasios G; Saloum J; Giannaris D; Chrelias C; Prentza A; Koutsouris D
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2006 Apr; 32(2):135-9. PubMed ID: 16594915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Interobserver agreement in CTG interpretation using the 2015 FIGO guidelines for intrapartum fetal monitoring.
Rei M; Tavares S; Pinto P; Machado AP; Monteiro S; Costa A; Costa-Santos C; Bernardes J; Ayres-De-Campos D
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2016 Oct; 205():27-31. PubMed ID: 27566218
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Inter-observer reliability of 4 fetal heart rate classifications.
Garabedian C; Butruille L; Drumez E; Servan Schreiber E; Bartolo S; Bleu G; Mesdag V; Deruelle P; De Jonckheere J; Houfflin-Debarge V
J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod; 2017 Feb; 46(2):131-135. PubMed ID: 28403968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Interobserver agreement in analysis of cardiotocograms recorded during trial of labor after cesarean.
Caning MM; Thisted DLA; Amer-Wählin I; Laier GH; Krebs L
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2019 Nov; 32(22):3778-3783. PubMed ID: 29724142
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. [Indirect standard cardiotocography plus fetal blood sampling versus indirect quantitative cardiotocography--a randomized comparative study in intrapartum monitoring].
Ignatov P; Atanasov B
Akush Ginekol (Sofiia); 2012; 51(5):3-10. PubMed ID: 23234029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Reliability in cardiotocography interpretation - impact of extended on-site education in addition to web-based learning: an observational study.
Gyllencreutz E; Hulthén Varli I; Lindqvist PG; Holzmann M
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2017 Apr; 96(4):496-502. PubMed ID: 28052320
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A randomised clinical trial on cardiotocography plus fetal blood sampling versus cardiotocography plus ST-analysis of the fetal electrocardiogram (STAN) for intrapartum monitoring.
Westerhuis ME; Moons KG; van Beek E; Bijvoet SM; Drogtrop AP; van Geijn HP; van Lith JM; Mol BW; Nijhuis JG; Oei SG; Porath MM; Rijnders RJ; Schuitemaker NW; van der Tweel I; Visser GH; Willekes C; Kwee A
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2007 Jul; 7():13. PubMed ID: 17655764
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Delay in intervention increases neonatal morbidity in births monitored with cardiotocography and ST-waveform analysis.
Kessler J; Moster D; Albrechtsen S
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2014 Feb; 93(2):175-81. PubMed ID: 24251909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Fetal scalp pH and ST analysis of the fetal ECG as an adjunct to cardiotocography to predict fetal acidosis in labor--a multi-center, case controlled study.
Norén H; Luttkus AK; Stupin JH; Blad S; Arulkumaran S; Erkkola R; Luzietti R; Visser GH; Yli B; Rosén KG
J Perinat Med; 2007; 35(5):408-14. PubMed ID: 17685855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
