These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

170 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24598424)

  • 1. Increased predation of nutrient-enriched aposematic prey.
    Halpin CG; Skelhorn J; Rowe C
    Proc Biol Sci; 2014 Apr; 281(1781):20133255. PubMed ID: 24598424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Better the devil you know: avian predators find variation in prey toxicity aversive.
    Barnett CA; Bateson M; Rowe C
    Biol Lett; 2014 Nov; 10(11):20140533. PubMed ID: 25392317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Body size matters for aposematic prey during predator aversion learning.
    Smith KE; Halpin CG; Rowe C
    Behav Processes; 2014 Nov; 109 Pt B():173-9. PubMed ID: 25256160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The Impact of Detoxification Costs and Predation Risk on Foraging: Implications for Mimicry Dynamics.
    Halpin CG; Skelhorn J; Rowe C; Ruxton GD; Higginson AD
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(1):e0169043. PubMed ID: 28045959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Birds learn to use distastefulness as a signal of toxicity.
    Skelhorn J; Rowe C
    Proc Biol Sci; 2010 Jun; 277(1688):1729-34. PubMed ID: 20129989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The benefits of being toxic to deter predators depends on prey body size.
    Smith KE; Halpin CG; Rowe C
    Behav Ecol; 2016; 27(6):1650-1655. PubMed ID: 28028378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Predators' toxin burdens influence their strategic decisions to eat toxic prey.
    Skelhorn J; Rowe C
    Curr Biol; 2007 Sep; 17(17):1479-83. PubMed ID: 17716896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Predators' decisions to eat defended prey depend on the size of undefended prey.
    Halpin CG; Skelhorn J; Rowe C
    Anim Behav; 2013 Jun; 85(6):1315-1321. PubMed ID: 23814280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Ambient temperature influences birds' decisions to eat toxic prey.
    Chatelain M; Halpin CG; Rowe C
    Anim Behav; 2013 Oct; 86(4):733-740. PubMed ID: 24109148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Perspective: the evolution of warning coloration is not paradoxical.
    Marples NM; Kelly DJ; Thomas RJ
    Evolution; 2005 May; 59(5):933-40. PubMed ID: 16136793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Disentangling taste and toxicity in aposematic prey.
    Holen ØH
    Proc Biol Sci; 2013 Feb; 280(1753):20122588. PubMed ID: 23256198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Predator experience on cryptic prey affects the survival of conspicuous aposematic prey.
    Lindström L; Alatalo RV; Lyytinen A; Mappes J
    Proc Biol Sci; 2001 Feb; 268(1465):357-61. PubMed ID: 11270431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Avian predators taste-reject aposematic prey on the basis of their chemical defence.
    Skelhorn J; Rowe C
    Biol Lett; 2006 Sep; 2(3):348-50. PubMed ID: 17148400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Social learning within and across predator species reduces attacks on novel aposematic prey.
    Hämäläinen L; Mappes J; Rowland HM; Teichmann M; Thorogood R
    J Anim Ecol; 2020 May; 89(5):1153-1164. PubMed ID: 32077104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Avian predators attack aposematic prey more forcefully when they are part of an aggregation.
    Skelhorn J; Ruxton GD
    Biol Lett; 2006 Dec; 2(4):488-90. PubMed ID: 17148269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Seasonal changes in predator community switch the direction of selection for prey defences.
    Mappes J; Kokko H; Ojala K; Lindström L
    Nat Commun; 2014 Sep; 5():5016. PubMed ID: 25247589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The signal detection problem of aposematic prey revisited: integrating prior social and personal experience.
    Hämäläinen L; Thorogood R
    Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 2020 Jul; 375(1802):20190473. PubMed ID: 32420858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Investigating Müllerian mimicry: predator learning and variation in prey defences.
    Ihalainen E; Lindström L; Mappes J
    J Evol Biol; 2007 Mar; 20(2):780-91. PubMed ID: 17305843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The effects of predator learning, forgetting, and recognition errors on the evolution of warning coloration.
    Servedio MR
    Evolution; 2000 Jun; 54(3):751-63. PubMed ID: 10937250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Social transmission of avoidance among predators facilitates the spread of novel prey.
    Thorogood R; Kokko H; Mappes J
    Nat Ecol Evol; 2018 Feb; 2(2):254-261. PubMed ID: 29255302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.