142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24598837)
1. Automated indirect immunofluorescence microscopy enables the implementation of a quantitative internal quality control system for anti-nuclear antibody (ANA) analysis.
Maenhout TM; Bonroy C; Verfaillie C; Stove V; Devreese K
Clin Chem Lab Med; 2014 Jul; 52(7):989-98. PubMed ID: 24598837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Harmonizing by reducing inter-run variability: performance evaluation of a quality assurance program for antinuclear antibody detection by indirect immunofluorescence.
Bogaert L; Van den Bremt S; Schouwers S; Bossuyt X; Van Hoovels L
Clin Chem Lab Med; 2019 Jun; 57(7):990-998. PubMed ID: 30838836
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Automated indirect immunofluorescence antinuclear antibody analysis is a standardized alternative for visual microscope interpretation.
Bonroy C; Verfaillie C; Smith V; Persijn L; De Witte E; De Keyser F; Devreese K
Clin Chem Lab Med; 2013 Sep; 51(9):1771-9. PubMed ID: 23612554
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Integrating quality assurance in autoimmunity: the changing face of the automated ANA IIF test.
Van Hoovels L; Bossuyt X; Manfredi M; Grossi V; Benucci M; Van Den Bremt S; De Baere H; Franceschi D; Tosi E; Meoni M; Bizzaro N; Infantino M
Clin Chem Lab Med; 2021 Jun; 59(7):1247-1255. PubMed ID: 33594844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. ANA IIF Automation: Moving towards Harmonization? Results of a Multicenter Study.
Van den Bremt S; Schouwers S; Van Blerk M; Van Hoovels L
J Immunol Res; 2017; 2017():6038137. PubMed ID: 28321418
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Automated antinuclear immunofluorescence antibody analysis is a reliable approach in routine clinical laboratories.
Zheng B; Li E; Zhu H; Lu J; Shi X; Zhang J; Li M
Clin Chem Lab Med; 2017 Oct; 55(12):1922-1930. PubMed ID: 28467309
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A fully automated IIF system for the detection of antinuclear antibodies and antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies.
Shovman O; Agmon-Levin N; Gilburd B; Martins T; Petzold A; Matthias T; Shoenfeld Y
Immunol Res; 2015 Feb; 61(1-2):135-40. PubMed ID: 25403695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. ICARE improves antinuclear antibody detection by overcoming the barriers preventing accreditation.
Bertin D; Mouhajir Y; Bongrand P; Bardin N
Clin Chim Acta; 2016 Feb; 454():57-61. PubMed ID: 26742604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Automated antinuclear immunofluorescence antibody screening: a comparative study of six computer-aided diagnostic systems.
Bizzaro N; Antico A; Platzgummer S; Tonutti E; Bassetti D; Pesente F; Tozzoli R; Tampoia M; Villalta D;
Autoimmun Rev; 2014 Mar; 13(3):292-8. PubMed ID: 24220268
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluation of antinuclear antibodies by indirect immunofluorescence and line immunoassay methods': four years' data from Turkey.
Sener AG; Afsar I; Demirci M
APMIS; 2014 Dec; 122(12):1167-70. PubMed ID: 24735346
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Performance of an Automated Fluorescence Antinuclear Antibody Image Analyzer.
Yoo IY; Oh JW; Cha HS; Koh EM; Kang ES
Ann Lab Med; 2017 May; 37(3):240-247. PubMed ID: 28224770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. An indirect comparison of automated indirect immunofluorescence vs automated solid-phase immunoassays for antinuclear antibody detection: A meta-analysis and adjusted indirect comparison of diagnostic test accuracy.
Zhang M; Zhang X
Int J Rheum Dis; 2022 Sep; 25(9):991-1002. PubMed ID: 35726725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Automated Processing and Evaluation of Anti-Nuclear Antibody Indirect Immunofluorescence Testing.
Ricchiuti V; Adams J; Hardy DJ; Katayev A; Fleming JK
Front Immunol; 2018; 9():927. PubMed ID: 29780386
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. EUROPattern Suite technology for computer-aided immunofluorescence microscopy in autoantibody diagnostics.
Krause C; Ens K; Fechner K; Voigt J; Fraune J; Rohwäder E; Hahn M; Danckwardt M; Feirer C; Barth E; Martinetz T; Stöcker W
Lupus; 2015 Apr; 24(4-5):516-29. PubMed ID: 25801895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A comparative study on the reliability of an automated system for the evaluation of cell-based indirect immunofluorescence.
Melegari A; Bonaguri C; Russo A; Luisita B; Trenti T; Lippi G
Autoimmun Rev; 2012 Aug; 11(10):713-6. PubMed ID: 22269861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Novel method for quantitative ANA measurement using near-infrared imaging.
Peterson LK; Wells D; Shaw L; Velez MG; Harbeck R; Dragone LL
J Immunol Methods; 2009 Sep; 349(1-2):1-8. PubMed ID: 19720064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Correlation of antinuclear antibody immunofluorescence patterns with immune profile using line immunoassay in the Indian scenario.
Sebastian W; Roy A; Kini U; Mullick S
Indian J Pathol Microbiol; 2010; 53(3):427-32. PubMed ID: 20699497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A step towards standardization: A method for end-point titer determination by fluorescence index of an automated microscope. End-point titer determination by fluorescence index.
Carbone T; Gilio M; Padula MC; Tramontano G; D'Angelo S; Pafundi V
J Immunol Methods; 2018 May; 456():67-71. PubMed ID: 29470974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Novel method for ANA quantitation using IIF imaging system.
Peng X; Tang J; Wu Y; Yang B; Hu J
J Immunol Methods; 2014 Feb; 404():52-8. PubMed ID: 24370749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluation of the BioPlex 2200 ANA screen: analysis of 510 healthy subjects: incidence of natural/predictive autoantibodies.
Shovman O; Gilburd B; Barzilai O; Shinar E; Larida B; Zandman-Goddard G; Binder SR; Shoenfeld Y
Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2005 Jun; 1050():380-8. PubMed ID: 16014555
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
