200 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24598893)
1. Some reflections on peer review.
Elwood TW
J Allied Health; 2014; 43(1):1. PubMed ID: 24598893
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Full disclosure of financial interests in biomedical publications--a reminder.
Bailey BJ
Laryngoscope; 2002 Feb; 112(2):211-2. PubMed ID: 11889370
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. [Double-blind peer review].
Fenyvesi T
Orv Hetil; 2002 Feb; 143(5):245-8. PubMed ID: 11875838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Thoughts of a manuscript reviewer.
Bluestone N
Pharos Alpha Omega Alpha Honor Med Soc; 1996; 59(3):14-8. PubMed ID: 9074317
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Standards for ethical publication.
Johnson JT; Niparko JK; Levine PA; Kennedy DW; Rudy SF; Weber P; Weber RS; Benninger MS; Rosenfeld RM; Ruben RJ; Smith RJ; Sataloff RT; Weir N
Am J Otolaryngol; 2007; 28(1):1-2. PubMed ID: 17162121
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. The impact of electronic publication and the E-journal on quality and the peer review process.
Lee ST
Ann Acad Med Singap; 1997 Jul; 26(4):393. PubMed ID: 9395796
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Regional associations of medical journal editors: moving from rhetoric to reality.
Habibzadeh F
Bull World Health Organ; 2005 Jun; 83(6):404. PubMed ID: 15976887
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. The elite reviewer.
DeMaria AN
J Am Coll Cardiol; 2003 Jan; 41(1):157-8. PubMed ID: 12570959
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. [Knowledge on feet of clay].
Dahlqvist R
Lakartidningen; 2008 May 7-13; 105(19):1405-6. PubMed ID: 18574980
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. [The journals must honestly tell who is doing the job].
Bergström R
Lakartidningen; 2008 May 7-13; 105(19):1406-7. PubMed ID: 18574981
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Clarifying press before paper.
Snow AA; Pilson D
Nat Biotechnol; 2003 Jun; 21(6):597-8. PubMed ID: 12776136
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Publishing medical research: a marketplace on the commons.
Frey JJ; Phillips WR
Ann Fam Med; 2013; 11(2):104-5. PubMed ID: 23508595
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Press before paper--when media and science collide.
Stewart CN
Nat Biotechnol; 2003 Apr; 21(4):353-4. PubMed ID: 12665812
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Publish (high-quality evidence for clinical practice) or (patients may) perish.
Munro CL; Savel RH
Am J Crit Care; 2013 May; 22(3):182-4. PubMed ID: 23635926
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. [Criteria for the strictness of scientific publications].
Shepoval'nikov AN; Tsitseroshin MN
Fiziol Cheloveka; 1994; 20(5):99-114. PubMed ID: 7843556
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Manual Therapy Journal 10 year anniversary.
Moore A; Jull G
Man Ther; 2005 May; 10(2):93-5. PubMed ID: 15922229
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Peer Review and the Public's Health.
DeAngelis CD
Milbank Q; 2015 Jun; 93(2):247-50. PubMed ID: 26044626
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Impact factors revisited.
Eriksson E
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2006 May; 14(5):403. PubMed ID: 16575615
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Trends and future challenges in medical editing.
Akhtar J
J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2011 Jan; 21(1):2-3. PubMed ID: 21276375
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Bias in the trial and reporting of trials of homeopathy: a fundamental breakdown in peer review and standards?
Frass M; Schuster E; Muchitsch I; Duncan J; Gei W; Kozel G; Kastinger-Mayr C; Felleitner AE; Reiter C; Endler C; Oberbaum M
J Altern Complement Med; 2005 Oct; 11(5):780-2. PubMed ID: 16296904
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
