571 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24599115)
1. Comparative analysis of methods for identifying somatic copy number alterations from deep sequencing data.
Alkodsi A; Louhimo R; Hautaniemi S
Brief Bioinform; 2015 Mar; 16(2):242-54. PubMed ID: 24599115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Using SAAS-CNV to Detect and Characterize Somatic Copy Number Alterations in Cancer Genomes from Next Generation Sequencing and SNP Array Data.
Zhang Z; Hao K
Methods Mol Biol; 2018; 1833():29-47. PubMed ID: 30039361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. An evaluation of copy number variation detection tools for cancer using whole exome sequencing data.
Zare F; Dow M; Monteleone N; Hosny A; Nabavi S
BMC Bioinformatics; 2017 May; 18(1):286. PubMed ID: 28569140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. CoNCoS: copy number estimation in cancer with controlled support.
Abdallah AT; Fischer M; Nürnberg P; Nothnagel M; Frommolt P
J Bioinform Comput Biol; 2015 Oct; 13(5):1550027. PubMed ID: 26449175
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A computational approach to distinguish somatic vs. germline origin of genomic alterations from deep sequencing of cancer specimens without a matched normal.
Sun JX; He Y; Sanford E; Montesion M; Frampton GM; Vignot S; Soria JC; Ross JS; Miller VA; Stephens PJ; Lipson D; Yelensky R
PLoS Comput Biol; 2018 Feb; 14(2):e1005965. PubMed ID: 29415044
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. CloneCNA: detecting subclonal somatic copy number alterations in heterogeneous tumor samples from whole-exome sequencing data.
Yu Z; Li A; Wang M
BMC Bioinformatics; 2016 Aug; 17():310. PubMed ID: 27538789
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. SAAS-CNV: A Joint Segmentation Approach on Aggregated and Allele Specific Signals for the Identification of Somatic Copy Number Alterations with Next-Generation Sequencing Data.
Zhang Z; Hao K
PLoS Comput Biol; 2015 Nov; 11(11):e1004618. PubMed ID: 26583378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Computational analysis in cancer exome sequencing.
Evans P; Kong Y; Krauthammer M
Methods Mol Biol; 2014; 1176():219-27. PubMed ID: 25030931
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. CODEX: a normalization and copy number variation detection method for whole exome sequencing.
Jiang Y; Oldridge DA; Diskin SJ; Zhang NR
Nucleic Acids Res; 2015 Mar; 43(6):e39. PubMed ID: 25618849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Genomic determinants of somatic copy number alterations across human cancers.
Zhang Y; Xu H; Frishman D
Hum Mol Genet; 2016 Mar; 25(5):1019-30. PubMed ID: 26732428
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Sequenza: allele-specific copy number and mutation profiles from tumor sequencing data.
Favero F; Joshi T; Marquard AM; Birkbak NJ; Krzystanek M; Li Q; Szallasi Z; Eklund AC
Ann Oncol; 2015 Jan; 26(1):64-70. PubMed ID: 25319062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. DEFOR: depth- and frequency-based somatic copy number alteration detector.
Zhang H; Zhan X; Brugarolas J; Xie Y
Bioinformatics; 2019 Oct; 35(19):3824-3825. PubMed ID: 30860569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Exome sequence read depth methods for identifying copy number changes.
Kadalayil L; Rafiq S; Rose-Zerilli MJ; Pengelly RJ; Parker H; Oscier D; Strefford JC; Tapper WJ; Gibson J; Ennis S; Collins A
Brief Bioinform; 2015 May; 16(3):380-92. PubMed ID: 25169955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Simultaneous Copy Number Alteration and Single-Nucleotide Variation Analysis in Matched Aqueous Humor and Tumor Samples in Children with Retinoblastoma.
Schmidt MJ; Prabakar RK; Pike S; Yellapantula V; Peng CC; Kuhn P; Hicks J; Xu L; Berry JL
Int J Mol Sci; 2023 May; 24(10):. PubMed ID: 37239954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. An evaluation of copy number variation detection tools from whole-exome sequencing data.
Tan R; Wang Y; Kleinstein SE; Liu Y; Zhu X; Guo H; Jiang Q; Allen AS; Zhu M
Hum Mutat; 2014 Jul; 35(7):899-907. PubMed ID: 24599517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Breast and prostate cancers harbor common somatic copy number alterations that consistently differ by race and are associated with survival.
Chen Y; Sadasivan SM; She R; Datta I; Taneja K; Chitale D; Gupta N; Davis MB; Newman LA; Rogers CG; Paris PL; Li J; Rybicki BA; Levin AM
BMC Med Genomics; 2020 Aug; 13(1):116. PubMed ID: 32819446
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Low-cost and clinically applicable copy number profiling using repeat DNA.
Abujudeh S; Zeki SS; van Lanschot MCJ; Pusung M; Weaver JMJ; Li X; Noorani A; Metz AJ; Bornschein J; Bower L; Miremadi A; Fitzgerald RC; Morrissey ER; Lynch AG
BMC Genomics; 2022 Aug; 23(1):599. PubMed ID: 35978291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. SynthEx: a synthetic-normal-based DNA sequencing tool for copy number alteration detection and tumor heterogeneity profiling.
Silva GO; Siegel MB; Mose LE; Parker JS; Sun W; Perou CM; Chen M
Genome Biol; 2017 Apr; 18(1):66. PubMed ID: 28390427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of somatic copy number estimation tools for whole-exome sequencing data.
Nam JY; Kim NK; Kim SC; Joung JG; Xi R; Lee S; Park PJ; Park WY
Brief Bioinform; 2016 Mar; 17(2):185-92. PubMed ID: 26210357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A survey of tools for variant analysis of next-generation genome sequencing data.
Pabinger S; Dander A; Fischer M; Snajder R; Sperk M; Efremova M; Krabichler B; Speicher MR; Zschocke J; Trajanoski Z
Brief Bioinform; 2014 Mar; 15(2):256-78. PubMed ID: 23341494
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
