337 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24599784)
1. A comparative analysis of two contrasting European approaches for rewarding the value added by drugs for cancer: England versus France.
Drummond M; de Pouvourville G; Jones E; Haig J; Saba G; Cawston H
Pharmacoeconomics; 2014 May; 32(5):509-20. PubMed ID: 24599784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The use of 'added benefit' to determine the price of new anti-cancer drugs in France, 2004-2017.
Rodwin MA; Mancini J; Duran S; Jalbert AC; Viens P; Maraninchi D; Gonçalves A; Marino P
Eur J Cancer; 2021 Mar; 145():11-18. PubMed ID: 33412466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Cabazitaxel for Hormone-Relapsed Metastatic Prostate Cancer Previously Treated With a Docetaxel-Containing Regimen: An Evidence Review Group Perspective of a NICE Single Technology Appraisal.
Kearns B; Pandor A; Stevenson M; Hamilton J; Chambers D; Clowes M; Graham J; Kumar MS
Pharmacoeconomics; 2017 Apr; 35(4):415-424. PubMed ID: 27770303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparative Assessment of Reimbursement Recommendations by NICE and HAS for Oncology New Medicines Indicated for the Treatment of Solid Tumors from 2015 to 2021.
Trouiller JB; Laramée P
Med Decis Making; 2023; 43(7-8):961-972. PubMed ID: 37480275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Prices and clinical benefit of cancer drugs in the USA and Europe: a cost-benefit analysis.
Vokinger KN; Hwang TJ; Grischott T; Reichert S; Tibau A; Rosemann T; Kesselheim AS
Lancet Oncol; 2020 May; 21(5):664-670. PubMed ID: 32359489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Value and Price of Multi-indication Cancer Drugs in the USA, Germany, France, England, Canada, Australia, and Scotland.
Michaeli DT; Mills M; Kanavos P
Appl Health Econ Health Policy; 2022 Sep; 20(5):757-768. PubMed ID: 35821360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Ponatinib for Treating Acute Lymphoblastic Leukaemia: An Evidence Review Group Perspective of a NICE Single Technology Appraisal.
Stevenson M; Pandor A; Hamilton J; Stevens J; Rowntree C; Martyn-St James M; Rawdin A; Wong R
Pharmacoeconomics; 2018 Jul; 36(7):759-768. PubMed ID: 29502175
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of topotecan for ovarian cancer.
Forbes C; Shirran L; Bagnall AM; Duffy S; ter Riet G
Health Technol Assess; 2001; 5(28):1-110. PubMed ID: 11701100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Value-based pricing: Toward achieving a balance between individual and population gains in health benefits.
Parmar A; Jiao T; Saluja R; Chan KKW
Cancer Med; 2020 Jan; 9(1):94-103. PubMed ID: 31711274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Ponatinib for Treating Chronic Myeloid Leukaemia: An Evidence Review Group Perspective of a NICE Single Technology Appraisal.
Pandor A; Stevenson M; Stevens J; James MM; Hamilton J; Byrne J; Rudin C; Rawdin A; Wong R
Pharmacoeconomics; 2018 Aug; 36(8):903-915. PubMed ID: 29480454
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Topotecan, pegylated liposomal doxorubicin hydrochloride and paclitaxel for second-line or subsequent treatment of advanced ovarian cancer: a systematic review and economic evaluation.
Main C; Bojke L; Griffin S; Norman G; Barbieri M; Mather L; Stark D; Palmer S; Riemsma R
Health Technol Assess; 2006 Mar; 10(9):1-132. iii-iv. PubMed ID: 16545208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Prospective cost-effectiveness analysis of cetuximab in metastatic colorectal cancer: evaluation of National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group CO.17 trial.
Mittmann N; Au HJ; Tu D; O'Callaghan CJ; Isogai PK; Karapetis CS; Zalcberg JR; Evans WK; Moore MJ; Siddiqui J; Findlay B; Colwell B; Simes J; Gibbs P; Links M; Tebbutt NC; Jonker DJ; ;
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2009 Sep; 101(17):1182-92. PubMed ID: 19666851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of cardiac resynchronisation (biventricular pacing) for heart failure: systematic review and economic model.
Fox M; Mealing S; Anderson R; Dean J; Stein K; Price A; Taylor RS
Health Technol Assess; 2007 Nov; 11(47):iii-iv, ix-248. PubMed ID: 17999842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Adefovir dipivoxil and pegylated interferon alfa-2a for the treatment of chronic hepatitis B: a systematic review and economic evaluation.
Shepherd J; Jones J; Takeda A; Davidson P; Price A
Health Technol Assess; 2006 Aug; 10(28):iii-iv, xi-xiv, 1-183. PubMed ID: 16904047
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Cost-Effectiveness and Net Monetary Benefit of Olaparib Maintenance Therapy Versus No Maintenance Therapy After First-line Platinum-based Chemotherapy in Newly Diagnosed Advanced BRCA1/2-mutated Ovarian Cancer in the Italian National Health Service.
Armeni P; Borsoi L; Fornaro G; Jommi C; Colombo N; Costa F
Clin Ther; 2020 Jul; 42(7):1192-1209.e12. PubMed ID: 32591103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Cost-effectiveness of atezolizumab versus docetaxel and nivolumab in the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer as a second line in France.
Marine S; Stéphane R; Nicolas P; Felizzi F; Paracha N; Benjamin M; Perol M
J Med Econ; 2020 May; 23(5):464-473. PubMed ID: 31951770
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Informing a cost-effectiveness threshold for Saudi Arabia.
Al-Jedai AH; Lomas J; Almudaiheem HY; Al-Ruthia YSH; Alghamdi S; Awad N; Alghamdi A; Alowairdhi MA; Alabdulkarim H; Almadi M; Bunyan RF; Ochalek J
J Med Econ; 2023; 26(1):128-138. PubMed ID: 36576804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Erlotinib monotherapy for the maintenance treatment of non-small cell lung cancer after previous platinum-containing chemotherapy: a NICE single technology appraisal.
Dickson R; Bagust A; Boland A; Blundell M; Davis H; Dundar Y; Hockenhull J; Martin Saborido C; Oyee J; Ramani VS
Pharmacoeconomics; 2011 Dec; 29(12):1051-62. PubMed ID: 21967156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Will the reformed Cancer Drugs Fund address the most common types of uncertainty? An analysis of NICE cancer drug appraisals.
Morrell L; Wordsworth S; Schuh A; Middleton MR; Rees S; Barker RW
BMC Health Serv Res; 2018 May; 18(1):393. PubMed ID: 29855313
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Relative effectiveness assessments of oncology medicines for pricing and reimbursement decisions in European countries.
Kleijnen S; Lipska I; Leonardo Alves T; Meijboom K; Elsada A; Vervölgyi V; d'Andon A; Timoney A; Leufkens HG; De Boer A; Goettsch WG
Ann Oncol; 2016 Sep; 27(9):1768-75. PubMed ID: 27329251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
