BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

266 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24599942)

  • 1. Predictability is necessary for closed-loop visual feedback delay adaptation.
    Rohde M; van Dam LC; Ernst MO
    J Vis; 2014 Mar; 14(3):4. PubMed ID: 24599942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Asymmetries in visuomotor recalibration of time perception: does causal binding distort the window of integration?
    Rohde M; Greiner L; Ernst MO
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2014 Mar; 147():127-35. PubMed ID: 23928564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effect of visuomotor-map uncertainty on visuomotor adaptation.
    Saijo N; Gomi H
    J Neurophysiol; 2012 Mar; 107(6):1576-85. PubMed ID: 22190631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Children do not recalibrate motor-sensory temporal order after exposure to delayed sensory feedback.
    Vercillo T; Burr D; Sandini G; Gori M
    Dev Sci; 2015 Sep; 18(5):703-12. PubMed ID: 25444457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Adaptation to visual feedback delays on touchscreens with hand vision.
    Cattan E; Perrier P; Bérard F; Gerber S; Rochet-Capellan A
    Exp Brain Res; 2018 Dec; 236(12):3191-3201. PubMed ID: 30191261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Adaptation to visual feedback delay in a redundant motor task.
    Farshchiansadegh A; Ranganathan R; Casadio M; Mussa-Ivaldi FA
    J Neurophysiol; 2015 Jan; 113(2):426-33. PubMed ID: 25339704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Adaptation to visual feedback delay influences visuomotor learning.
    Honda T; Hirashima M; Nozaki D
    PLoS One; 2012; 7(5):e37900. PubMed ID: 22666408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Eye movements in interception with delayed visual feedback.
    Cámara C; de la Malla C; López-Moliner J; Brenner E
    Exp Brain Res; 2018 Jul; 236(7):1837-1847. PubMed ID: 29675715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Feedback and feedforward adaptation to visuomotor delay during reaching and slicing movements.
    Botzer L; Karniel A
    Eur J Neurosci; 2013 Jul; 38(1):2108-23. PubMed ID: 23701418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Retention of proprioceptive recalibration following visuomotor adaptation.
    Nourouzpour N; Salomonczyk D; Cressman EK; Henriques DY
    Exp Brain Res; 2015 Mar; 233(3):1019-29. PubMed ID: 25537467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Visual-shift adaptation is composed of separable sensory and task-dependent effects.
    Simani MC; McGuire LM; Sabes PN
    J Neurophysiol; 2007 Nov; 98(5):2827-41. PubMed ID: 17728389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Feedback delay attenuates implicit but facilitates explicit adjustments to a visuomotor rotation.
    Schween R; Hegele M
    Neurobiol Learn Mem; 2017 Apr; 140():124-133. PubMed ID: 28257877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Auditory dominance in motor-sensory temporal recalibration.
    Sugano Y; Keetels M; Vroomen J
    Exp Brain Res; 2016 May; 234(5):1249-62. PubMed ID: 26610349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Sensorimotor adaptation and cue reweighting compensate for distorted 3D shape information, accounting for paradoxical perception-action dissociations.
    Cesanek E; Taylor JA; Domini F
    J Neurophysiol; 2020 Apr; 123(4):1407-1419. PubMed ID: 32101506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Physical delay but not subjective delay determines learning rate in prism adaptation.
    Tanaka H; Homma K; Imamizu H
    Exp Brain Res; 2011 Jan; 208(2):257-68. PubMed ID: 21076819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Adaptive changes in automatic motor responses based on acquired visuomotor correspondence.
    Itaguchi Y; Fukuzawa K
    Exp Brain Res; 2019 Jan; 237(1):147-159. PubMed ID: 30361773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The absence or temporal offset of visual feedback does not influence adaptation to novel movement dynamics.
    McKenna E; Bray LCJ; Zhou W; Joiner WM
    J Neurophysiol; 2017 Oct; 118(4):2483-2498. PubMed ID: 28794198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Different contributions of efferent and reafferent feedback to sensorimotor temporal recalibration.
    Arikan BE; van Kemenade BM; Fiehler K; Kircher T; Drewing K; Straube B
    Sci Rep; 2021 Nov; 11(1):22631. PubMed ID: 34799622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Neuronal correlates of continuous manual tracking under varying visual movement feedback in a virtual reality environment.
    Limanowski J; Kirilina E; Blankenburg F
    Neuroimage; 2017 Feb; 146():81-89. PubMed ID: 27845254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Adaptation to a nonlinear visuomotor amplitude transformation with continuous and terminal visual feedback.
    Heuer H; Hegele M
    J Mot Behav; 2008 Sep; 40(5):368-79. PubMed ID: 18782712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.