135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24600170)
1. Reduction of radiation risks in patients undergoing some X-ray examinations by using optimal projections: A Monte Carlo program-based mathematical calculation.
Chaparian A; Kanani A; Baghbanian M
J Med Phys; 2014 Jan; 39(1):32-9. PubMed ID: 24600170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effective dose reduction in spine radiographic imaging by choosing the less radiation-sensitive side of the body.
Ben-Shlomo A; Bartal G; Mosseri M; Avraham B; Leitner Y; Shabat S
Spine J; 2016 Apr; 16(4):558-63. PubMed ID: 26704861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Fetal radiation doses and subsequent risks from X-ray examinations: Should we be concerned?
Chaparian A; Aghabagheri M
Iran J Reprod Med; 2013 Nov; 11(11):899-904. PubMed ID: 24639714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Lumbar spine radiology: analysis of the posteroanterior projection.
Brennan PC; Madigan E
Eur Radiol; 2000; 10(7):1197-201. PubMed ID: 11003420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Differences in effective dose and energy imparted estimation from PA-AP, RLAT-LLAT projections in pediatric full spine x-ray examination using the Monte Carlo technique.
Gialousis GI; Yakoumakis EN; Papadopoulou DI; Makri TK; Yakoumakis NE; Dimitriou PA; Georgiou EK
Phys Med Biol; 2006 Jan; 51(2):287-97. PubMed ID: 16394339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Use of the VIP-Man model to calculate energy imparted and effective dose for x-ray examinations.
Winslow M; Huda W; Xu XG; Chao TC; Shi CY; Ogden KM; Scalzetti EM
Health Phys; 2004 Feb; 86(2):174-82. PubMed ID: 14744051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. PATIENT RADIATION DOSE FROM CHEST X-RAY EXAMINATIONS IN THE WEST BANK-PALESTINE.
Lahham A; Issa A; ALMasri H
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2018 Feb; 178(3):298-303. PubMed ID: 28981835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. PATIENT DOSES IN COMMON DIAGNOSTIC X-RAY EXAMINATIONS.
Metaxas VI; Messaris GA; Lekatou AN; Petsas TG; Panayiotakis GS
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2019 Jul; 184(1):12-27. PubMed ID: 30289498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. ESTIMATION OF THE ORGAN AND EFFECTIVE DOSE TO PATIENTS UNDERGOING MEDICAL DIAGNOSTIC X-RAY EXAMINATIONS IN SAUDI ARABIA.
Ababneh ZQ; Almusallam M; Alfajri I; Ababneh AM; Aljarrah KM; Tries MA; Al Anazi N
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2021 May; 194(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 33940619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Measurement of entrance skin dose and estimation of organ dose during pediatric chest radiography.
Kumaresan M; Kumar R; Biju K; Choubey A; Kantharia S
Health Phys; 2011 Jun; 100(6):654-7. PubMed ID: 22004934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The potential for reduction of radiation doses to patients undergoing some common X ray examinations in Tanzania.
Muhogora WE; Nyanda AM
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2001; 94(4):381-4. PubMed ID: 11499443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Estimation of entrance surface air kerma due to diagnostic X-ray examinations of adult patients in Uttarakhand, India and establishment of local diagnostic reference levels.
Uniyal SC; Chaturvedi V; Sharma SD; Raghuvanshi S
Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 2017 Sep; 40(3):687-694. PubMed ID: 28819817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of anteroposterior and posteroanterior projection in lumbar spine radiography.
Alukic E; Skrk D; Mekis N
Radiol Oncol; 2018 May; 52(4):468-474. PubMed ID: 30511934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Identification of less-irradiating tube angulations in invasive cardiology.
Kuon E; Dahm JB; Empen K; Robinson DM; Reuter G; Wucherer M
J Am Coll Cardiol; 2004 Oct; 44(7):1420-8. PubMed ID: 15464322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effect of Localizer Radiography Projection on Organ Dose at Chest CT with Automatic Tube Current Modulation.
Saltybaeva N; Krauss A; Alkadhi H
Radiology; 2017 Mar; 282(3):842-849. PubMed ID: 27548276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Estimation of effective dose to the patient during medical x-ray examinations from measurements of the dose-area product.
Le Heron JC
Phys Med Biol; 1992 Nov; 37(11):2117-26. PubMed ID: 1438564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. LOW BMI PATIENT DOSE IN DIGITAL RADIOGRAPHY.
Efthymiou FO; Metaxas VI; Dimitroukas CP; Panayiotakis GS
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2020 Jul; 189(1):1-12. PubMed ID: 32043128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Local-Reference Patient Dose Evaluation in Conventional Radiography Examinations in Mazandaran, Iran.
Khoshdel-Navi D; Shabestani-Monfared A; Deevband MR; Abdi R; Nabahati M
J Biomed Phys Eng; 2016 Jun; 6(2):61-70. PubMed ID: 27672626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. "Anode heel effect" on patient dose in lumbar spine radiography.
Fung KK; Gilboy WB
Br J Radiol; 2000 May; 73(869):531-6. PubMed ID: 10884750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Real-time, ray casting-based scatter dose estimation for c-arm x-ray system.
Alnewaini Z; Langer E; Schaber P; David M; Kretz D; Steil V; Hesser J
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2017 Mar; 18(2):144-153. PubMed ID: 28300387
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
