These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

175 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24600379)

  • 1. Object-based selection modulates top-down attentional shifts.
    Nishida S; Shibata T; Ikeda K
    Front Hum Neurosci; 2014; 8():90. PubMed ID: 24600379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Top-down directed attention to stimulus features and attentional allocation to bottom-up deviations.
    Sawaki R; Katayama J
    J Vis; 2008 Nov; 8(15):4.1-8. PubMed ID: 19146288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Is that a belt or a snake? Object attentional selection affects the early stages of visual sensory processing.
    Zani A; Proverbio AM
    Behav Brain Funct; 2012 Feb; 8():6. PubMed ID: 22300540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Object-based attention: shifting or uncertainty?
    Drummond L; Shomstein S
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 Oct; 72(7):1743-55. PubMed ID: 20952774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Selecting category specific visual information: Top-down and bottom-up control of object based attention.
    Corradi-Dell'Acqua C; Fink GR; Weidner R
    Conscious Cogn; 2015 Sep; 35():330-41. PubMed ID: 25735196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Prioritization to visual objects: Roles of sensory uncertainty.
    Luo T; Wu X; Wang H; Fu S
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2018 Feb; 80(2):512-526. PubMed ID: 29164522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Bottom-Up and Top-Down Factors Differentially Influence Stimulus Representations Across Large-Scale Attentional Networks.
    Long NM; Kuhl BA
    J Neurosci; 2018 Mar; 38(10):2495-2504. PubMed ID: 29437930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The effects of visual search efficiency on object-based attention.
    Greenberg AS; Rosen M; Cutrone E; Behrmann M
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2015 Jul; 77(5):1544-57. PubMed ID: 25832192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Visual search: bottom-up or top-down?
    Patel GA; Sathian K
    Front Biosci; 2000 Jan; 5():D169-93. PubMed ID: 10702378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The object advantage can be eliminated under equiluminant conditions.
    Brown JM; Guenther BA; Narang S; Siddiqui AP; Foley NC
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2014 Dec; 21(6):1459-64. PubMed ID: 24700185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The Role of Top-Down Focused Spatial Attention in Preattentive Salience Coding and Salience-based Attentional Capture.
    Bertleff S; Fink GR; Weidner R
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2016 Aug; 28(8):1152-65. PubMed ID: 27054402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Brain and Cognitive Mechanisms of Top-Down Attentional Control in a Multisensory World: Benefits of Electrical Neuroimaging.
    Matusz PJ; Turoman N; Tivadar RI; Retsa C; Murray MM
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2019 Mar; 31(3):412-430. PubMed ID: 30513045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. An object-based visual attention model for robotic applications.
    Yu Y; Mann GK; Gosine RG
    IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern B Cybern; 2010 Oct; 40(5):1398-412. PubMed ID: 20129865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Top-Down Prioritization of Salient Items May Produce the So-Called Stimulus-Driven Capture.
    Benoni H
    Front Psychol; 2018; 9():218. PubMed ID: 29599731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Top-down but not bottom-up visual scanning is affected in hereditary pure cerebellar ataxia.
    Matsuda S; Matsumoto H; Furubayashi T; Fukuda H; Emoto M; Hanajima R; Tsuji S; Ugawa Y; Terao Y
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(12):e116181. PubMed ID: 25545148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Bottom-up and top-down attention are independent.
    Pinto Y; van der Leij AR; Sligte IG; Lamme VA; Scholte HS
    J Vis; 2013 Jul; 13(3):16. PubMed ID: 23863334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Target-nontarget similarity decreases search efficiency and increases stimulus-driven control in visual search.
    Barras C; Kerzel D
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2017 Oct; 79(7):2037-2043. PubMed ID: 28681179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Interactions between top-down and bottom-up attention in barn owls (Tyto alba).
    Lev-Ari T; Gutfreund Y
    Anim Cogn; 2018 Mar; 21(2):197-205. PubMed ID: 29214438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evidence for early top-down modulation of attention to salient visual cues through probe detection.
    Burnham BR
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2020 Jun; 82(3):1003-1023. PubMed ID: 31432340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Impairments in top down attentional processes in right parietal patients: paradoxical functional facilitation in visual search.
    Mangano GR; Oliveri M; Turriziani P; Smirni D; Zhaoping L; Cipolotti L
    Vision Res; 2014 Apr; 97():74-82. PubMed ID: 24582796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.