BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

176 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24601051)

  • 1. Is the 2009 FIGO staging system really valuable for stage I endometrial cancer?
    Atalay F; Cetinkaya K; Bacinoglu A
    Eur J Gynaecol Oncol; 2013; 34(6):556-8. PubMed ID: 24601051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Clinical application of adult comorbidity evaluation-27 in endometrial cancer].
    Tian WY; Wang YM; Yan Y; Gao JP; Sun DD; Jiang S; Sheng Y; Teng F; Xue FX
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2016 Nov; 51(11):810-817. PubMed ID: 27916063
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Significance of prognostic evaluation of International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics 2009 staging system on stage I endometrioid adenocarcinoma].
    Wang ZQ; Zhang Y; Wang JL; Shen DH; Mu T; Zhao X; Yao YY; Bai Y; Wei LH
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2012 Jan; 47(1):33-9. PubMed ID: 22455691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Revision of FIGO surgical staging in 2009 for endometrial cancer validates to improve risk stratification.
    Werner HM; Trovik J; Marcickiewicz J; Tingulstad S; Staff AC; Amant F; Salvesen HB;
    Gynecol Oncol; 2012 Apr; 125(1):103-8. PubMed ID: 22100838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Does the revised International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics staging system for endometrial cancer lead to increased discrimination in patient outcomes?
    Cooke EW; Pappas L; Gaffney DK
    Cancer; 2011 Sep; 117(18):4231-7. PubMed ID: 21387282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Is the revised 2018 FIGO staging system for cervical cancer more prognostic than the 2009 FIGO staging system for women previously staged as IB disease?
    Ayhan A; Aslan K; Bulut AN; Akilli H; Öz M; Haberal A; Meydanli MM
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2019 Sep; 240():209-214. PubMed ID: 31325847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Survival after stage IA endometrial cancer; can follow-up be altered? A prospective nationwide Danish survey.
    Lajer H; Elnegaard S; Christensen RD; Ortoft G; Schledermann DE; Mogensen O
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2012 Aug; 91(8):976-82. PubMed ID: 22548255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of prognosis in patients with endometrioid endometrial cancer staged IB in FIGO 1988 and 2009 classifications.
    Gottwald L; Moszynska-Zielińska M; Spych M; Korczynski J; Tylinski W; Szwalski J; Kubiak R; Pasz-Walczak G; Sobotkowski J; Suzin J; Piekarski J
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2012 Oct; 286(4):995-1000. PubMed ID: 22627994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Impact of 2009 FIGO staging system on the diagnostic value of preoperative MRI staging of endometrial carcinoma].
    Yu XD; Ouyang H; Lin M; Zhou CW; Zhang R
    Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2011 Sep; 33(9):692-6. PubMed ID: 22340052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. An intensive follow-up does not change survival of patients with clinical stage I endometrial cancer.
    Gadducci A; Cosio S; Fanucchi A; Cristofani R; Genazzani AR
    Anticancer Res; 2000; 20(3B):1977-84. PubMed ID: 10928137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Stage I and II Endometrial Adenocarcinoma: Analysis of 2009 FIGO Staging Revision and Impact on Survival by Adjuvant Therapy.
    Cahan B; Kim JH; Schultheiss TE; Wong JYC; Chen YJ
    Am J Clin Oncol; 2018 Mar; 41(3):302-306. PubMed ID: 26886945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The revised 2009 FIGO staging system for endometrial cancer: should the 1988 FIGO stages IA and IB be altered?
    Abu-Rustum NR; Zhou Q; Iasonos A; Alektiar KM; Leitao MM; Chi DS; Sonoda Y; Soslow R; Hensley M; Barakat RR
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2011 Apr; 21(3):511-6. PubMed ID: 21436699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A suggested modification to FIGO stage I endometrial cancer.
    Aristizabal P; Graesslin O; Barranger E; Clavel-Chapelon F; Haddad B; Luton D; Darai E; Rouzier R; Koskas M
    Gynecol Oncol; 2014 May; 133(2):192-6. PubMed ID: 24631453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The prognostic significance of surgical staging for carcinoma of the endometrium.
    Wolfson AH; Sightler SE; Markoe AM; Schwade JG; Averette HE; Ganjei P; Hilsenbeck SG
    Gynecol Oncol; 1992 May; 45(2):142-6. PubMed ID: 1592280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. New revised FIGO 2008 staging system for endometrial cancer produces better discrimination in survival compared with the 1988 staging system.
    Kato T; Watari H; Endo D; Mitamura T; Odagiri T; Konno Y; Hosaka M; Kobayashi N; Todo Y; Sudo S; Takeda M; Dong P; Kaneuchi M; Kudo M; Sakuragi N
    J Surg Oncol; 2012 Dec; 106(8):938-41. PubMed ID: 22740340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Associations between lymphovascular space invasion, nodal recurrence, and survival in patients with surgical stage I endometrioid endometrial adenocarcinoma.
    Veade AE; Foote J; Ehrisman J; Broadwater G; Davidson BA; Lee PS; Secord AA; Berchuck A; Havrilesky LJ
    World J Surg Oncol; 2019 May; 17(1):80. PubMed ID: 31077193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. FIGO 2023 endometrial staging: a leap of faith into the new "prognostic based' rather than "anatomical based" staging-too fast too furious??
    Bassetty KC; Begum D; Barmon D; Baruah U; Gupta S; Kumar M; Nath J; Khanikar D; Bhattacharyya M; Roy PS
    J Cancer Res Clin Oncol; 2024 May; 150(5):251. PubMed ID: 38733417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The outcome of stage I-II clinically and surgically staged papillary serous and clear cell endometrial cancers when compared with endometrioid carcinoma.
    Cirisano FD; Robboy SJ; Dodge RK; Bentley RC; Krigman HR; Synan IS; Soper JT; Clarke-Pearson DL
    Gynecol Oncol; 2000 Apr; 77(1):55-65. PubMed ID: 10739691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Lymphadenectomy increases the prognostic value of the revised 2009 FIGO staging system for endometrial cancer: a multi-center study.
    Kim HS; Kim HY; Park CY; Lee JM; Lee JK; Cho CH; Kim SM; Kim JW
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2012 Mar; 38(3):230-7. PubMed ID: 22244682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The new International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics surgical staging and survival rates in early endometrial carcinoma.
    Gal D; Recio FO; Zamurovic D
    Cancer; 1992 Jan; 69(1):200-2. PubMed ID: 1727664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.