These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

107 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2460320)

  • 21. Magnetoencephalography signals are influenced by skull defects.
    Lau S; Flemming L; Haueisen J
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2014 Aug; 125(8):1653-62. PubMed ID: 24418220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Magnetic localization of a dipolar current source implanted in a sphere and a human cranium.
    Barth DS; Sutherling W; Broffman J; Beatty J
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1986 Mar; 63(3):260-73. PubMed ID: 2419084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Influence of head model in biomagnetic source localization.
    Tomita S; Kajihara S; Kondo Y; Yoshida Y; Shibata K; Kado H
    Brain Topogr; 1996; 8(3):337-40. PubMed ID: 8728429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Error bounds for EEG and MEG dipole source localization.
    Mosher JC; Spencer ME; Leahy RM; Lewis PS
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1993 May; 86(5):303-21. PubMed ID: 7685264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Comparison of the amplitude/intensity function of the auditory evoked N1m and N1 components.
    Neukirch M; Hegerl U; Kötitz R; Dorn H; Gallinat J; Herrmann WM
    Neuropsychobiology; 2002; 45(1):41-8. PubMed ID: 11803241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. A 20-channel magnetoencephalography system based on optically pumped magnetometers.
    Borna A; Carter TR; Goldberg JD; Colombo AP; Jau YY; Berry C; McKay J; Stephen J; Weisend M; Schwindt PDD
    Phys Med Biol; 2017 Nov; 62(23):8909-8923. PubMed ID: 29035875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Effects of head shape on EEG's and MEG's.
    Cuffin BN
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1990 Jan; 37(1):44-52. PubMed ID: 2303269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Clinical application of visual evoked fields using an MRI-linked whole head MEG system.
    Nakasato N; Seki K; Fujita S; Hatanaka K; Kawamura T; Ohtomo S; Kanno A; Ikeda H; Yoshimoto T
    Front Med Biol Eng; 1996; 7(4):275-83. PubMed ID: 8956968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Dipole models for the EEG and MEG.
    Schimpf PH; Ramon C; Haueisen J
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2002 May; 49(5):409-18. PubMed ID: 12002172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. [Whole head measurement of auditory evoked magnetic field using a MR-linked helmet shaped MEG system].
    Nakasato N; Seki K; Kawamura T; Fujita S; Matani A; Fujiwara S; Yoshimoto T
    No To Shinkei; 1994 Jul; 46(7):632-7. PubMed ID: 7946618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Localization of realistic cortical activity in MEG using current multipoles.
    Jerbi K; Baillet S; Mosher JC; Nolte G; Garnero L; Leahy RM
    Neuroimage; 2004 Jun; 22(2):779-93. PubMed ID: 15193607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. [Right hemispheric dominancy in the auditory evoked magnetic fields for pure-tone stimuli].
    Kanno A; Nakasato N; Fujiwara S; Yoshimoto T
    No To Shinkei; 1996 Mar; 48(3):240-4. PubMed ID: 8868334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Model studies of the magnetocardiogram.
    Grynszpan F; Geselowitz DB
    Biophys J; 1973 Sep; 13(9):911-25. PubMed ID: 4733699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Localization of a dipolar source in a skull phantom: realistic versus spherical model.
    Menninghaus E; Lütkenhöner B; Gonzalez SL
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1994 Oct; 41(10):986-9. PubMed ID: 7959806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Magnetic auditory evoked fields: dipole orientation.
    Zimmerman JT; Reite M; Zimmerman JE
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1981 Aug; 52(2):151-6. PubMed ID: 6167424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. MEG versus EEG: influence of background activity on interictal spike detection.
    Ramantani G; Boor R; Paetau R; Ille N; Feneberg R; Rupp A; Boppel T; Scherg M; Rating D; Bast T
    J Clin Neurophysiol; 2006 Dec; 23(6):498-508. PubMed ID: 17143138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Measuring MEG closer to the brain: Performance of on-scalp sensor arrays.
    Iivanainen J; Stenroos M; Parkkonen L
    Neuroimage; 2017 Feb; 147():542-553. PubMed ID: 28007515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Analysis of MEG signals of spreading cortical depression with propagation constrained to a rectangular cortical strip. I. Lissencephalic rabbit model.
    Bowyer SM; Okada YC; Papuashvili N; Moran JE; Barkley GL; Welch KM; Tepley N
    Brain Res; 1999 Oct; 843(1-2):71-8. PubMed ID: 10528112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Confidence limits of dipole source reconstruction results.
    Fuchs M; Wagner M; Kastner J
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2004 Jun; 115(6):1442-51. PubMed ID: 15134713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Magnetic fields of the brain analysed by a multiple dipole approach using factor analysis.
    Grummich P; Vieth J; Kober H
    Clin Phys Physiol Meas; 1991; 12 Suppl A():61-6. PubMed ID: 1778056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.