These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

505 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24603316)

  • 1. Estimating predicted probabilities from logistic regression: different methods correspond to different target populations.
    Muller CJ; MacLehose RF
    Int J Epidemiol; 2014 Jun; 43(3):962-70. PubMed ID: 24603316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Noncollapsibility and its role in quantifying confounding bias in logistic regression.
    Schuster NA; Twisk JWR; Ter Riet G; Heymans MW; Rijnhart JJM
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2021 Jul; 21(1):136. PubMed ID: 34225653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The Integrated Calibration Index (ICI) and related metrics for quantifying the calibration of logistic regression models.
    Austin PC; Steyerberg EW
    Stat Med; 2019 Sep; 38(21):4051-4065. PubMed ID: 31270850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Polytomous logistic regression analysis could be applied more often in diagnostic research.
    Biesheuvel CJ; Vergouwe Y; Steyerberg EW; Grobbee DE; Moons KG
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2008 Feb; 61(2):125-34. PubMed ID: 18177785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Firth's logistic regression with rare events: accurate effect estimates and predictions?
    Puhr R; Heinze G; Nold M; Lusa L; Geroldinger A
    Stat Med; 2017 Jun; 36(14):2302-2317. PubMed ID: 28295456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Selection bias modeling using observed data augmented with imputed record-level probabilities.
    Thompson CA; Arah OA
    Ann Epidemiol; 2014 Oct; 24(10):747-53. PubMed ID: 25175700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Confounding adjustment performance of ordinal analysis methods in stroke studies.
    Zonneveld TP; Aigner A; Groenwold RHH; Algra A; Nederkoorn PJ; Grittner U; Kruyt ND; Siegerink B
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(4):e0231670. PubMed ID: 32298347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. On the use and misuse of scalar scores of confounders in design and analysis of observational studies.
    Pfeiffer RM; Riedl R
    Stat Med; 2015 Aug; 34(18):2618-35. PubMed ID: 25781579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Bias Formulas for Estimating Direct and Indirect Effects When Unmeasured Confounding Is Present.
    le Cessie S
    Epidemiology; 2016 Jan; 27(1):125-32. PubMed ID: 26426943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Controlling for continuous confounders in epidemiologic research.
    Brenner H; Blettner M
    Epidemiology; 1997 Jul; 8(4):429-34. PubMed ID: 9209859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. On the nondifferential misclassification of a binary confounder.
    Ogburn EL; VanderWeele TJ
    Epidemiology; 2012 May; 23(3):433-9. PubMed ID: 22450692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Propensity score model overfitting led to inflated variance of estimated odds ratios.
    Schuster T; Lowe WK; Platt RW
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2016 Dec; 80():97-106. PubMed ID: 27498378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The Number of Events per Confounder for Valid Estimation of Risk Difference Using Modified Least-Squares Regression.
    Hagiwara Y; Fukuda M; Matsuyama Y
    Am J Epidemiol; 2018 Nov; 187(11):2481-2490. PubMed ID: 30060121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Practical issues in using generalized estimating equations for inference on transitions in longitudinal data: What is being estimated?
    Bible J; Albert PS; Simons-Morton BG; Liu D
    Stat Med; 2019 Mar; 38(6):903-916. PubMed ID: 30411379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Bias formulas for external adjustment and sensitivity analysis of unmeasured confounders.
    Arah OA; Chiba Y; Greenland S
    Ann Epidemiol; 2008 Aug; 18(8):637-46. PubMed ID: 18652982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of logistic regression versus propensity score when the number of events is low and there are multiple confounders.
    Cepeda MS; Boston R; Farrar JT; Strom BL
    Am J Epidemiol; 2003 Aug; 158(3):280-7. PubMed ID: 12882951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The impact of unmeasured baseline effect modification on estimates from an inverse probability of treatment weighted logistic model.
    Delaney JA; Platt RW; Suissa S
    Eur J Epidemiol; 2009; 24(7):343-9. PubMed ID: 19418232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Estimation methods for the join distribution of repeated binary observations.
    Lipsitz SR; Fitzmaurice GM; Sleeper L; Zhao LP
    Biometrics; 1995 Jun; 51(2):562-70. PubMed ID: 7662845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effect decomposition in the presence of an exposure-induced mediator-outcome confounder.
    Vanderweele TJ; Vansteelandt S; Robins JM
    Epidemiology; 2014 Mar; 25(2):300-6. PubMed ID: 24487213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Application of directed acyclic graphs in identifying and controlling confounding bias].
    Liu HX; Wang HB; Wang N
    Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi; 2020 Apr; 41(4):585-588. PubMed ID: 32344486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 26.