185 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24603433)
1. Environmental status assessment using DNA metabarcoding: towards a genetics based Marine Biotic Index (gAMBI).
Aylagas E; Borja A; Rodríguez-Ezpeleta N
PLoS One; 2014; 9(3):e90529. PubMed ID: 24603433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of environmental DNA and bulk-sample metabarcoding using highly degenerate cytochrome c oxidase I primers.
Macher JN; Vivancos A; Piggott JJ; Centeno FC; Matthaei CD; Leese F
Mol Ecol Resour; 2018 Nov; 18(6):1456-1468. PubMed ID: 30129704
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Are genomic indices effective alternatives to morphology based benthic indices in biomonitoring studies? Perspectives from a major harbour and marine protected area.
Dias HQ; Sukumaran S
Mar Pollut Bull; 2023 Feb; 187():114586. PubMed ID: 36652865
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. DNA barcoding in the Southeast Pacific marine realm: Low coverage and geographic representation despite high diversity.
Ramirez JL; Rosas-Puchuri U; Cañedo RM; Alfaro-Shigueto J; Ayon P; Zelada-Mázmela E; Siccha-Ramirez R; Velez-Zuazo X
PLoS One; 2020; 15(12):e0244323. PubMed ID: 33370342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Performance of two Southern California benthic community condition indices using species abundance and presence-only data: relevance to DNA barcoding.
Ranasinghe JA; Stein ED; Miller PE; Weisberg SB
PLoS One; 2012; 7(8):e40875. PubMed ID: 22879881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Environmental DNA metabarcoding studies are critically affected by substrate selection.
Koziol A; Stat M; Simpson T; Jarman S; DiBattista JD; Harvey ES; Marnane M; McDonald J; Bunce M
Mol Ecol Resour; 2019 Mar; 19(2):366-376. PubMed ID: 30485662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. DNA barcoding of macrofauna act as a tool for assessing marine ecosystem.
Sigamani S; Perumal M; Thivakaran GA; Thangavel B; Kandasamy K
Mar Pollut Bull; 2020 Mar; 152():107891. PubMed ID: 27423443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Building on gAMBI in ports for a challenging biological invasions scenario: Blue-gNIS as a proof of concept.
Ibabe A; Miralles L; Carleos CE; Soto-López V; Menéndez-Teleña D; Bartolomé M; Montes HJ; González M; Dopico E; Garcia-Vazquez E; Borrell YJ
Mar Environ Res; 2021 Jul; 169():105340. PubMed ID: 33930798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. MetaZooGene Atlas and Database: Reference Sequences for Marine Ecosystems.
O'Brien TD; Blanco-Bercial L; Questel JM; Batta-Lona PG; Bucklin A
Methods Mol Biol; 2024; 2744():475-489. PubMed ID: 38683336
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Environmental DNA (eDNA) metabarcoding reveals strong discrimination among diverse marine habitats connected by water movement.
Jeunen GJ; Knapp M; Spencer HG; Lamare MD; Taylor HR; Stat M; Bunce M; Gemmell NJ
Mol Ecol Resour; 2019 Mar; 19(2):426-438. PubMed ID: 30576077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Increased performance of DNA metabarcoding of macroinvertebrates by taxonomic sorting.
Beentjes KK; Speksnijder AGCL; Schilthuizen M; Hoogeveen M; Pastoor R; van der Hoorn BB
PLoS One; 2019; 14(12):e0226527. PubMed ID: 31841568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The future of biotic indices in the ecogenomic era: Integrating (e)DNA metabarcoding in biological assessment of aquatic ecosystems.
Pawlowski J; Kelly-Quinn M; Altermatt F; Apothéloz-Perret-Gentil L; Beja P; Boggero A; Borja A; Bouchez A; Cordier T; Domaizon I; Feio MJ; Filipe AF; Fornaroli R; Graf W; Herder J; van der Hoorn B; Iwan Jones J; Sagova-Mareckova M; Moritz C; Barquín J; Piggott JJ; Pinna M; Rimet F; Rinkevich B; Sousa-Santos C; Specchia V; Trobajo R; Vasselon V; Vitecek S; Zimmerman J; Weigand A; Leese F; Kahlert M
Sci Total Environ; 2018 Oct; 637-638():1295-1310. PubMed ID: 29801222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Assessing the ecological health of the Chongming Dongtan Nature Reserve, China, using different benthic biotic indices.
Liu Z; Fan B; Huang Y; Yu P; Li Y; Chen M; Cai M; Lv W; Jiang Q; Zhao Y
Mar Pollut Bull; 2019 Sep; 146():76-84. PubMed ID: 31426218
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Forever young: The successful story of a marine biotic index.
Borja A; Chust G; Muxika I
Adv Mar Biol; 2019; 82():93-127. PubMed ID: 31229151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Can DNA-Based Ecosystem Assessments Quantify Species Abundance? Testing Primer Bias and Biomass--Sequence Relationships with an Innovative Metabarcoding Protocol.
Elbrecht V; Leese F
PLoS One; 2015; 10(7):e0130324. PubMed ID: 26154168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. MARES, a replicable pipeline and curated reference database for marine eukaryote metabarcoding.
Arranz V; Pearman WS; Aguirre JD; Liggins L
Sci Data; 2020 Jul; 7(1):209. PubMed ID: 32620910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Redesign of PCR primers for mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit I for marine invertebrates and application in all-taxa biotic surveys.
Geller J; Meyer C; Parker M; Hawk H
Mol Ecol Resour; 2013 Sep; 13(5):851-61. PubMed ID: 23848937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Metabarcoding Marine Sediments: Preparation of Amplicon Libraries.
Fonseca VG; Lallias D
Methods Mol Biol; 2016; 1452():183-96. PubMed ID: 27460378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. DNA Barcoding of Marine Metazoans.
Steinke D; Prosser SW; Hebert PD
Methods Mol Biol; 2016; 1452():155-68. PubMed ID: 27460376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Adding DNA barcoding to stream monitoring protocols - What's the additional value and congruence between morphological and molecular identification approaches?
Behrens-Chapuis S; Herder F; Geiger MF
PLoS One; 2021; 16(1):e0244598. PubMed ID: 33395693
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
