These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24604999)

  • 1. An in vitro study of the bond strength of five adhesives used for vinyl polysiloxane impression materials and tray materials.
    Kumar S; Gandhi UV; Banerjee S
    J Indian Prosthodont Soc; 2014 Mar; 14(1):61-6. PubMed ID: 24604999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The effect of different adhesives on vinyl polysiloxane bond strength to two tray materials.
    Peregrina A; Land MF; Wandling C; Johnston WM
    J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Sep; 94(3):209-13. PubMed ID: 16126072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluation of the Bond Strength of Universal Tray Adhesives on Silicone Impression Materials Using an Acrylic Tray.
    Kambiranda SC; Pinto B; Elpatal MA; Sam G; Chaitra AS; Rani RP
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2019 Dec; 20(12):1406-1411. PubMed ID: 32381841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The bond strength of different tray adhesives on vinyl polysiloxane to two tray materials: an in vitro study.
    Ashwini BL; Manjunath S; Mathew KX
    J Indian Prosthodont Soc; 2014 Mar; 14(1):29-37. PubMed ID: 24604995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Drying time of tray adhesive for adequate tensile bond strength between polyvinylsiloxane impression and tray resin material.
    Yi MH; Shim JS; Lee KW; Chung MK
    J Adv Prosthodont; 2009 Jul; 1(2):63-7. PubMed ID: 21165257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The effect of selected variables on the retention of irreversible hydrocolloid impression material.
    Al-Athel MS
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2008 Sep; 9(6):57-64. PubMed ID: 18784860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Factors that affect the adhesion of two irreversible hydrocolloid materials to two custom tray materials.
    Smith SJ; McCord JF; Macfarlane TV
    J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Oct; 88(4):423-30. PubMed ID: 12447220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Peel bond strength between 3D printing tray materials and elastomeric impression/adhesive systems: A laboratory study.
    Xu Y; Huettig F; Schille C; Schweizer E; Geis-Gerstorfer J; Spintzyk S
    Dent Mater; 2020 Jul; 36(7):e241-e254. PubMed ID: 32456949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Retention strength of impression materials to a tray material using different adhesive methods: an in vitro study.
    Marafie Y; Looney S; Nelson S; Chan D; Browning W; Rueggeberg F
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Dec; 100(6):432-40. PubMed ID: 19033027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effect of reactive adhesives on the tensile bond strength of polyvinyl siloxane impression materials to methyl methacrylate tray material.
    Ona M; Takahashi H; Sato M; Igarashi Y; Wakabayashi N
    Dent Mater J; 2010 May; 29(3):336-40. PubMed ID: 20484844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effect of Time and Method of Drying on Bond Strength of Tray Adhesives with Vinyl Polysiloxanes.
    Kothari RN; Arpudaswamy S; Nandini Y; Dhole RI; Shivram D; Shetty R
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2019 Jan; 20(1):108-112. PubMed ID: 31058622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Tensile bond strength between custom tray and elastomeric impression material.
    Maruo Y; Nishigawa G; Oka M; Minagi S; Irie M; Suzuki K
    Dent Mater J; 2007 May; 26(3):323-8. PubMed ID: 17694739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The effect of custom tray material type and adhesive drying time on the tensile bond strength of an impression material/adhesive system.
    Dixon DL; Breeding LC; Brown JS
    Int J Prosthodont; 1994; 7(2):129-33. PubMed ID: 8003192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The effect of custom tray material type and surface treatment on the tensile bond strength of an impression material/adhesive system.
    Dixon DL; Breeding LC; Bosser MJ; Nafso AJ
    Int J Prosthodont; 1993; 6(3):303-6. PubMed ID: 8397701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The effect of custom tray material type and fabrication technique on tensile bond strength of impression material adhesive systems.
    Abdullah MA; Talic YF
    J Oral Rehabil; 2003 Mar; 30(3):312-7. PubMed ID: 12588506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effect of disinfection of custom tray materials on adhesive properties of several impression material systems.
    Thompson GA; Vermilyea SG; Agar JR
    J Prosthet Dent; 1994 Dec; 72(6):651-6. PubMed ID: 7853264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of Tensile Bond Strength of Addition Silicone with Different Custom Tray Materials Using Different Retentive Methods.
    Patil RV; Vijayraghavan V; Jadhav M; Jajoo S; Desai S; Jagtap C
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2021 Mar; 22(3):278-283. PubMed ID: 34210929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Properties of the tray adhesive of an addition polymerizing silicone to impression tray materials.
    Sulong MZ; Setchell DJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 1991 Dec; 66(6):743-7. PubMed ID: 1805022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Distortion of disposable plastic stock trays when used with putty vinyl polysiloxane impression materials.
    Cho GC; Chee WW
    J Prosthet Dent; 2004 Oct; 92(4):354-8. PubMed ID: 15507908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Adhesive properties of several impression material systems: Part II.
    Chai JY; Jameson LM; Moser JB; Hesby RA
    J Prosthet Dent; 1991 Sep; 66(3):287-92. PubMed ID: 1800721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.