These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

166 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24605260)

  • 1. Preliminary clinical experience with digital breast tomosynthesis in the visualization of breast microcalcifications.
    Destounis SV; Arieno AL; Morgan RC
    J Clin Imaging Sci; 2013; 3():65. PubMed ID: 24605260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Visualization of Breast Microcalcifications on Digital Breast Tomosynthesis and 2-Dimensional Digital Mammography Using Specimens.
    Byun J; Lee JE; Cha ES; Chung J; Kim JH
    Breast Cancer (Auckl); 2017; 11():1178223417703388. PubMed ID: 28469438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Diagnostic performance of digital breast tomosynthesis with a wide scan angle compared to full-field digital mammography for the detection and characterization of microcalcifications.
    Clauser P; Nagl G; Helbich TH; Pinker-Domenig K; Weber M; Kapetas P; Bernathova M; Baltzer PAT
    Eur J Radiol; 2016 Dec; 85(12):2161-2168. PubMed ID: 27842661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of the Detection Rate of Simulated Microcalcifications in Full-Field Digital Mammography, Digital Breast Tomosynthesis, and Synthetically Reconstructed 2-Dimensional Images Performed With 2 Different Digital X-ray Mammography Systems.
    Peters S; Hellmich M; Stork A; Kemper J; Grinstein O; Püsken M; Stahlhut L; Kinner S; Maintz D; Krug KB
    Invest Radiol; 2017 Apr; 52(4):206-215. PubMed ID: 27861206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Initial experience with combination digital breast tomosynthesis plus full field digital mammography or full field digital mammography alone in the screening environment.
    Destounis S; Arieno A; Morgan R
    J Clin Imaging Sci; 2014; 4():9. PubMed ID: 24744966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Comparison of full-field digital mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis on assessment of the lesions in dense breast: a preliminary study].
    Li Y; Ye ZX; Wu T; An YH; Liu PF; Bao RX
    Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2013 Jan; 35(1):33-7. PubMed ID: 23648297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Microcalcifications Detected at Screening Mammography: Synthetic Mammography and Digital Breast Tomosynthesis versus Digital Mammography.
    Lai YC; Ray KM; Lee AY; Hayward JH; Freimanis RI; Lobach IV; Joe BN
    Radiology; 2018 Dec; 289(3):630-638. PubMed ID: 30277445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Digital breast tomosynthesis versus full-field digital mammography: comparison of the accuracy of lesion measurement and characterization using specimens.
    Seo N; Kim HH; Shin HJ; Cha JH; Kim H; Moon JH; Gong G; Ahn SH; Son BH
    Acta Radiol; 2014 Jul; 55(6):661-7. PubMed ID: 24005560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Quantitative analysis of radiation dosage and image quality between digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) with two-dimensional synthetic mammography and full-field digital mammography (FFDM).
    Choi Y; Woo OH; Shin HS; Cho KR; Seo BK; Choi GY
    Clin Imaging; 2019; 55():12-17. PubMed ID: 30703693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Diagnostic Performance of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis with the Two-Dimensional Synthesized Mammogram for Suspicious Breast Microcalcifications Compared to Full-Field Digital Mammography in Stereotactic Breast Biopsy.
    Shin J; Woo OH; Shin HS; Song SE; Cho KR; Seo BK
    J Korean Soc Radiol; 2022 Sep; 83(5):1090-1103. PubMed ID: 36276204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of synthetic mammography, reconstructed from digital breast tomosynthesis, and digital mammography: evaluation of lesion conspicuity and BI-RADS assessment categories.
    Mariscotti G; Durando M; Houssami N; Fasciano M; Tagliafico A; Bosco D; Casella C; Bogetti C; Bergamasco L; Fonio P; Gandini G
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2017 Dec; 166(3):765-773. PubMed ID: 28819781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A comparison of full-field digital mammograms versus 2D synthesized mammograms for detection of microcalcifications on screening.
    Wahab RA; Lee SJ; Zhang B; Sobel L; Mahoney MC
    Eur J Radiol; 2018 Oct; 107():14-19. PubMed ID: 30292258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Diagnostic Performance of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis for Breast Suspicious Calcifications From Various Populations: A Comparison With Full-field Digital Mammography.
    Li J; Zhang H; Jiang H; Guo X; Zhang Y; Qi D; Guan J; Liu Z; Wu E; Luo S
    Comput Struct Biotechnol J; 2019; 17():82-89. PubMed ID: 30622686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparative analysis between synthetic mammography reconstructed from digital breast tomosynthesis and full-field digital mammography for breast cancer detection and visibility.
    Murakami R; Uchiyama N; Tani H; Yoshida T; Kumita S
    Eur J Radiol Open; 2020; 7():100207. PubMed ID: 33102630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison between two-dimensional synthetic mammography reconstructed from digital breast tomosynthesis and full-field digital mammography for the detection of T1 breast cancer.
    Choi JS; Han BK; Ko EY; Ko ES; Hahn SY; Shin JH; Kim MJ
    Eur Radiol; 2016 Aug; 26(8):2538-46. PubMed ID: 26628063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Digital breast tomosynthesis versus full-field digital mammography-Which modality provides more accurate prediction of margin status in specimen radiography?
    Amer HA; Schmitzberger F; Ingold-Heppner B; Kussmaul J; El Tohamy MF; Tantawy HI; Hamm B; Makowski M; Fallenberg EM
    Eur J Radiol; 2017 Aug; 93():258-264. PubMed ID: 28668424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Addition of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis to Full-Field Digital Mammography in the Diagnostic Setting: Additional Value and Cancer Detectability.
    Seo M; Chang JM; Kim SA; Kim WH; Lim JH; Lee SH; Bae MS; Koo HR; Cho N; Moon WK
    J Breast Cancer; 2016 Dec; 19(4):438-446. PubMed ID: 28053633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Transfer Learning From Convolutional Neural Networks for Computer-Aided Diagnosis: A Comparison of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis and Full-Field Digital Mammography.
    Mendel K; Li H; Sheth D; Giger M
    Acad Radiol; 2019 Jun; 26(6):735-743. PubMed ID: 30076083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of full-field digital mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis in ultrasonography-detected breast cancers.
    Nam KJ; Han BK; Ko ES; Choi JS; Ko EY; Jeong DW; Choo KS
    Breast; 2015 Oct; 24(5):649-55. PubMed ID: 26292782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of a stationary digital breast tomosynthesis system to magnified 2D mammography using breast tissue specimens.
    Tucker AW; Calliste J; Gidcumb EM; Wu J; Kuzmiak CM; Hyun N; Zeng D; Lu J; Zhou O; Lee YZ
    Acad Radiol; 2014 Dec; 21(12):1547-52. PubMed ID: 25172412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.