138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24605924)
21. Quantitative structure-activity relationship modeling of the toxicity of organothiophosphate pesticides to Daphnia magna and Cyprinus carpio.
Zvinavashe E; Du T; Griff T; van den Berg HH; Soffers AE; Vervoort J; Murk AJ; Rietjens IM
Chemosphere; 2009 Jun; 75(11):1531-8. PubMed ID: 19376559
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Merging applicability domains for in silico assessment of chemical mutagenicity.
Liu R; Wallqvist A
J Chem Inf Model; 2014 Mar; 54(3):793-800. PubMed ID: 24494696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Antioxidant QSAR modeling as exemplified on polyphenols.
Lucić B; Amić D; Trinajstić N
Methods Mol Biol; 2008; 477():207-18. PubMed ID: 19082949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Local and global quantitative structure-activity relationship modeling and prediction for the baseline toxicity.
Yuan H; Wang Y; Cheng Y
J Chem Inf Model; 2007; 47(1):159-69. PubMed ID: 17238261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Performance of (consensus) kNN QSAR for predicting estrogenic activity in a large diverse set of organic compounds.
Asikainen AH; Ruuskanen J; Tuppurainen KA
SAR QSAR Environ Res; 2004 Feb; 15(1):19-32. PubMed ID: 15113066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. QSAR analyses of skin penetration enhancers.
Iyer M; Zheng T; Hopfinger AJ; Tseng YJ
J Chem Inf Model; 2007; 47(3):1130-49. PubMed ID: 17472334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Application of validated QSAR models of D1 dopaminergic antagonists for database mining.
Oloff S; Mailman RB; Tropsha A
J Med Chem; 2005 Nov; 48(23):7322-32. PubMed ID: 16279792
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Semi-automated workflow for molecular pair analysis and QSAR-assisted transformation space expansion.
Yang ZY; Fu L; Lu AP; Liu S; Hou TJ; Cao DS
J Cheminform; 2021 Nov; 13(1):86. PubMed ID: 34774096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. A QSAR study on relationship between structure of sulfonamides and their carbonic anhydrase inhibitory activity using the eigenvalue (EVA) method.
Oltulu O; Yaşar MM; Eroğlu E
Eur J Med Chem; 2009 Sep; 44(9):3439-44. PubMed ID: 19303173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Unified QSAR approach to antimicrobials. Part 3: first multi-tasking QSAR model for input-coded prediction, structural back-projection, and complex networks clustering of antiprotozoal compounds.
Prado-Prado FJ; González-Díaz H; de la Vega OM; Ubeira FM; Chou KC
Bioorg Med Chem; 2008 Jun; 16(11):5871-80. PubMed ID: 18485714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Local lazy regression: making use of the neighborhood to improve QSAR predictions.
Guha R; Dutta D; Jurs PC; Chen T
J Chem Inf Model; 2006; 46(4):1836-47. PubMed ID: 16859315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Application of predictive QSAR models to database mining: identification and experimental validation of novel anticonvulsant compounds.
Shen M; Béguin C; Golbraikh A; Stables JP; Kohn H; Tropsha A
J Med Chem; 2004 Apr; 47(9):2356-64. PubMed ID: 15084134
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Antiprotozoan lead discovery by aligning dry and wet screening: prediction, synthesis, and biological assay of novel quinoxalinones.
Martins Alho MA; Marrero-Ponce Y; Barigye SJ; Meneses-Marcel A; Machado Tugores Y; Montero-Torres A; Gómez-Barrio A; Nogal JJ; García-Sánchez RN; Vega MC; Rolón M; Martínez-Fernández AR; Escario JA; Pérez-Giménez F; Garcia-Domenech R; Rivera N; Mondragón R; Mondragón M; Ibarra-Velarde F; Lopez-Arencibia A; Martín-Navarro C; Lorenzo-Morales J; Cabrera-Serra MG; Piñero J; Tytgat J; Chicharro R; Arán VJ
Bioorg Med Chem; 2014 Mar; 22(5):1568-85. PubMed ID: 24513185
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Localized heuristic inverse quantitative structure activity relationship with bulk descriptors using numerical gradients.
Stålring J; Almeida PR; Carlsson L; Helgee Ahlberg E; Hasselgren C; Boyer S
J Chem Inf Model; 2013 Aug; 53(8):2001-17. PubMed ID: 23845139
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. QSAR--how good is it in practice? Comparison of descriptor sets on an unbiased cross section of corporate data sets.
Gedeck P; Rohde B; Bartels C
J Chem Inf Model; 2006; 46(5):1924-36. PubMed ID: 16995723
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Bond-based 3D-chiral linear indices: theory and QSAR applications to central chirality codification.
Castillo-Garit JA; Marrero-Ponce Y; Torrens F; García-Domenech R; Romero-Zaldivar V
J Comput Chem; 2008 Nov; 29(15):2500-12. PubMed ID: 18470969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. In silico binary classification QSAR models based on 4D-fingerprints and MOE descriptors for prediction of hERG blockage.
Su BH; Shen MY; Esposito EX; Hopfinger AJ; Tseng YJ
J Chem Inf Model; 2010 Jul; 50(7):1304-18. PubMed ID: 20565102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Linear indices of the "molecular pseudograph's atom adjacency matrix": definition, significance-interpretation, and application to QSAR analysis of flavone derivatives as HIV-1 integrase inhibitors.
Marrero-Ponce Y
J Chem Inf Comput Sci; 2004; 44(6):2010-26. PubMed ID: 15554670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Optimized block-wise variable combination by particle swarm optimization for partial least squares modeling in quantitative structure-activity relationship studies.
Lin WQ; Jiang JH; Shen Q; Shen GL; Yu RQ
J Chem Inf Model; 2005; 45(2):486-93. PubMed ID: 15807514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Integration of in silico and in vitro tools for scaffold optimization during drug discovery: predicting P-glycoprotein efflux.
Desai PV; Sawada GA; Watson IA; Raub TJ
Mol Pharm; 2013 Apr; 10(4):1249-61. PubMed ID: 23363443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
