These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

98 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24605976)

  • 1. Blinded versus unblinded covariate selection in confirmatory survival trials.
    Kunz C; Kieser M
    J Biopharm Stat; 2014; 24(2):398-414. PubMed ID: 24605976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. An adaptive confirmatory trial with interim treatment selection: practical experiences and unbalanced randomization.
    Heritier S; Lô SN; Morgan CC
    Stat Med; 2011 Jun; 30(13):1541-54. PubMed ID: 21432887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Blinded and unblinded internal pilot study designs for clinical trials with count data.
    Schneider S; Schmidli H; Friede T
    Biom J; 2013 Jul; 55(4):617-33. PubMed ID: 23703749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Re-estimating the sample size of an on-going blinded trial based on the method of randomization block sums.
    Ganju J; Xing B
    Stat Med; 2009 Jan; 28(1):24-38. PubMed ID: 18837073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Continuous Bayesian adaptive randomization based on event times with covariates.
    Cheung YK; Inoue LY; Wathen JK; Thall PF
    Stat Med; 2006 Jan; 25(1):55-70. PubMed ID: 16025549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Validity of tests under covariate-adaptive biased coin randomization and generalized linear models.
    Shao J; Yu X
    Biometrics; 2013 Dec; 69(4):960-9. PubMed ID: 23848580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Design and analytic concepts for periodontal clinical trials.
    Imrey PB; Chilton NW
    J Periodontol; 1992 Dec; 63(12 Suppl):1124-40. PubMed ID: 1479532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Adaptive blinded sample size adjustment for comparing two normal means--a mostly Bayesian approach.
    Hartley AM
    Pharm Stat; 2012; 11(3):230-40. PubMed ID: 22422722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Adaptive methods: telling "the rest of the story".
    Emerson SS; Fleming TR
    J Biopharm Stat; 2010 Nov; 20(6):1150-65. PubMed ID: 21058111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Interim treatment selection with a flexible selection margin in clinical trials.
    Wu Y; Zhao PL
    Stat Med; 2013 Jul; 32(15):2529-43. PubMed ID: 23212767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Who is blinded in randomized clinical trials? A study of 200 trials and a survey of authors.
    Haahr MT; Hróbjartsson A
    Clin Trials; 2006; 3(4):360-5. PubMed ID: 17060210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Epidemiological factors in clinical trial design.
    Wassilak S
    Dev Biol Stand; 1998; 95():75-83. PubMed ID: 9855417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A method to estimate the variance of an endpoint from an on-going blinded trial.
    Xing B; Ganju J
    Stat Med; 2005 Jun; 24(12):1807-14. PubMed ID: 15803440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Blinded sample size re-estimation in superiority and noninferiority trials: bias versus variance in variance estimation.
    Friede T; Kieser M
    Pharm Stat; 2013; 12(3):141-6. PubMed ID: 23509095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A case study of the effect of covariate adjustment in a sequential survival clinical trial.
    Todd S; Sahdra M
    J Biopharm Stat; 2001 Nov; 11(4):297-311. PubMed ID: 12018781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Adaptive Dunnett tests for treatment selection.
    Koenig F; Brannath W; Bretz F; Posch M
    Stat Med; 2008 May; 27(10):1612-25. PubMed ID: 17876763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Inference from blinded data in randomized clinical trials.
    Zhou K; Ganju J
    Clin Trials; 2013 Oct; 10(5):744-53. PubMed ID: 24130201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Power and sample size calculations for discrete bounded outcome scores.
    Tsonaka R; Rizopoulos D; Lesaffre E
    Stat Med; 2006 Dec; 25(24):4241-52. PubMed ID: 16947202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A simple, flexible, and effective covariate-adaptive treatment allocation procedure.
    Loux TM
    Stat Med; 2013 Sep; 32(22):3775-87. PubMed ID: 23637002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Outcome assessment with blinded versus unblinded POP-Q exams.
    Antosh DD; Iglesia CB; Vora S; Sokol AI
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2011 Nov; 205(5):489.e1-4. PubMed ID: 21907962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.