296 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24606232)
1. Normative visual acuity in infants and preschool-aged children in Sydney.
Leone JF; Mitchell P; Kifley A; Rose KA;
Acta Ophthalmol; 2014 Nov; 92(7):e521-9. PubMed ID: 24606232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Visual acuity testability and comparability in Australian preschool children: the Sydney Paediatric Eye Disease Study.
Leone JF; Gole GA; Mitchell P; Kifley A; Pai AS; Rose KA
Eye (Lond); 2012 Jul; 26(7):925-32. PubMed ID: 22498798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of the amblyopia treatment study HOTV and electronic-early treatment of diabetic retinopathy study visual acuity protocols in children aged 5 to 12 years.
Rice ML; Leske DA; Holmes JM
Am J Ophthalmol; 2004 Feb; 137(2):278-82. PubMed ID: 14962417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Large sample population age norms for visual acuities obtained with Vistech-Teller Acuity Cards.
Salomão SR; Ventura DF
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1995 Mar; 36(3):657-70. PubMed ID: 7890496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of the amblyopia treatment study HOTV and the electronic-early treatment of diabetic retinopathy study visual acuity protocols in amblyopic children aged 5 to 11 years.
Birch EE; Strauber SF; Beck RW; Holmes JM;
J AAPOS; 2009 Feb; 13(1):75-8. PubMed ID: 18848480
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Feasibility and comparison of visual acuity testing methods in children with neurofibromatosis type 1 and/or optic pathway gliomas.
Avery RA; Bouffet E; Packer RJ; Reginald A
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2013 Feb; 54(2):1034-8. PubMed ID: 23329671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Should tumbling E go out of date in amblyopia screening? Evidence from a population-based sample normative in children aged 3-4 years.
Guimaraes S; Fernandes T; Costa P; Silva E
Br J Ophthalmol; 2018 Jun; 102(6):761-766. PubMed ID: 28988161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Amblyopia prevalence and risk factors in Australian preschool children.
Pai AS; Rose KA; Leone JF; Sharbini S; Burlutsky G; Varma R; Wong TY; Mitchell P
Ophthalmology; 2012 Jan; 119(1):138-44. PubMed ID: 21963268
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of Visual Acuity Results Between ATS-HOTV and E-ETDRS Testing Methods in Children With Optic Pathway Gliomas.
Avery RA; Go C; Fisher MJ; Liu GT; Garcia A; Richter M; McGeehan B; Quinn GE; Ying GS
Transl Vis Sci Technol; 2022 Mar; 11(3):10. PubMed ID: 35262649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Normative pediatric visual acuity using single surrounded HOTV optotypes on the Electronic Visual Acuity Tester following the Amblyopia Treatment Study protocol.
Drover JR; Felius J; Cheng CS; Morale SE; Wyatt L; Birch EE
J AAPOS; 2008 Apr; 12(2):145-9. PubMed ID: 18155943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of recognition and grating acuities in very-low-birth-weight children with and without retinal residua of retinopathy of prematurity. Cryotherapy for Retinopathy of Prematurity Cooperative Group.
Dobson V; Quinn GE; Tung B; Palmer EA; Reynolds JD
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1995 Mar; 36(3):692-702. PubMed ID: 7890499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Are norms based on the original Teller Acuity Cards appropriate for use with the new Teller Acuity Cards II?
Clifford CE; Haynes BM; Dobson V
J AAPOS; 2005 Oct; 9(5):475-9. PubMed ID: 16213399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Low-contrast acuity measurement: does it add value in the visual assessment of down syndrome and cerebral palsy populations?
Little JA; McCullough S; McClelland J; Jackson AJ; Saunders KJ
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2013 Jan; 54(1):251-7. PubMed ID: 23233262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Recognition acuity, grating acuity, contrast sensitivity, and visual fields in 6-year-old children.
Hargadon DD; Wood J; Twelker JD; Harvey EM; Dobson V
Arch Ophthalmol; 2010 Jan; 128(1):70-4. PubMed ID: 20065220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Visual acuity norms in pre-school children: the Multi-Ethnic Pediatric Eye Disease Study.
Pan Y; Tarczy-Hornoch K; Cotter SA; Wen G; Borchert MS; Azen SP; Varma R;
Optom Vis Sci; 2009 Jun; 86(6):607-12. PubMed ID: 19430325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Do picture-based charts overestimate visual acuity? Comparison of Kay Pictures, Lea Symbols, HOTV and Keeler logMAR charts with Sloan letters in adults and children.
Anstice NS; Jacobs RJ; Simkin SK; Thomson M; Thompson B; Collins AV
PLoS One; 2017; 12(2):e0170839. PubMed ID: 28152076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Diagnostic accuracy and agreement between visual acuity charts for detecting significant refractive errors in preschoolers.
Thomas J; Rajashekar B; Kamath A; Gogate P
Clin Exp Optom; 2020 May; 103(3):347-352. PubMed ID: 31566805
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Repeatability of Monocular Acuity Testing in Adults with and without Down Syndrome.
Ravikumar A; Benoit JS; Morrison KB; Marsack JD; Anderson HA
Optom Vis Sci; 2018 Mar; 95(3):202-211. PubMed ID: 29461409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Studies on development of visual acuity in infants measured by the Teller Acuity Cards.
Suzuki Y; Awaya S
Jpn J Ophthalmol; 1995; 39(2):166-71. PubMed ID: 8538073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The Sonksen logMAR test of visual acuity: II. Age norms from 2 years 9 months to 8 years.
Sonksen PM; Wade AM; Proffitt R; Heavens S; Salt AT
J AAPOS; 2008 Feb; 12(1):18-22. PubMed ID: 17651997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
