521 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24606279)
1. Effects of interferer facing orientation on speech perception by normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.
Strelcyk O; Pentony S; Kalluri S; Edwards B
J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Mar; 135(3):1419-32. PubMed ID: 24606279
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Phoneme recognition in vocoded maskers by normal-hearing and aided hearing-impaired listeners.
Phatak SA; Grant KW
J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Aug; 136(2):859-66. PubMed ID: 25096119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Sentence intelligibility during segmental interruption and masking by speech-modulated noise: Effects of age and hearing loss.
Fogerty D; Ahlstrom JB; Bologna WJ; Dubno JR
J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Jun; 137(6):3487-501. PubMed ID: 26093436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Detection threshold for sound distortion resulting from noise reduction in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.
Brons I; Dreschler WA; Houben R
J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Sep; 136(3):1375. PubMed ID: 25190410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Bilateral Versus Unilateral Cochlear Implantation in Adult Listeners: Speech-On-Speech Masking and Multitalker Localization.
Rana B; Buchholz JM; Morgan C; Sharma M; Weller T; Konganda SA; Shirai K; Kawano A
Trends Hear; 2017; 21():2331216517722106. PubMed ID: 28752811
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Speech quality evaluation of a sparse coding shrinkage noise reduction algorithm with normal hearing and hearing impaired listeners.
Sang J; Hu H; Zheng C; Li G; Lutman ME; Bleeck S
Hear Res; 2015 Sep; 327():175-85. PubMed ID: 26232529
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Masking release for hearing-impaired listeners: The effect of increased audibility through reduction of amplitude variability.
Desloge JG; Reed CM; Braida LD; Perez ZD; D'Aquila LA
J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Jun; 141(6):4452. PubMed ID: 28679277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A Danish open-set speech corpus for competing-speech studies.
Nielsen JB; Dau T; Neher T
J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Jan; 135(1):407-20. PubMed ID: 24437781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Can basic auditory and cognitive measures predict hearing-impaired listeners' localization and spatial speech recognition abilities?
Neher T; Laugesen S; Jensen NS; Kragelund L
J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Sep; 130(3):1542-58. PubMed ID: 21895093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Masking release with changing fundamental frequency: Electric acoustic stimulation resembles normal hearing subjects.
Auinger AB; Riss D; Liepins R; Rader T; Keck T; Keintzel T; Kaider A; Baumgartner WD; Gstoettner W; Arnoldner C
Hear Res; 2017 Jul; 350():226-234. PubMed ID: 28527538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Auditory and auditory-visual intelligibility of speech in fluctuating maskers for normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.
Bernstein JG; Grant KW
J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 May; 125(5):3358-72. PubMed ID: 19425676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The effects of selective consonant amplification on sentence recognition in noise by hearing-impaired listeners.
Saripella R; Loizou PC; Thibodeau L; Alford JA
J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Nov; 130(5):3028-37. PubMed ID: 22087930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. An algorithm to increase intelligibility for hearing-impaired listeners in the presence of a competing talker.
Healy EW; Delfarah M; Vasko JL; Carter BL; Wang D
J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Jun; 141(6):4230. PubMed ID: 28618817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Intelligibility of interrupted and interleaved speech for normal-hearing listeners and cochlear implantees.
Gnansia D; Pressnitzer D; Péan V; Meyer B; Lorenzi C
Hear Res; 2010 Jun; 265(1-2):46-53. PubMed ID: 20197084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. An algorithm to improve speech recognition in noise for hearing-impaired listeners.
Healy EW; Yoho SE; Wang Y; Wang D
J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Oct; 134(4):3029-38. PubMed ID: 24116438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. On a reference-free speech quality estimator for hearing aids.
Suelzle D; Parsa V; Falk TH
J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 May; 133(5):EL412-8. PubMed ID: 23656102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effect of training on word-recognition performance in noise for young normal-hearing and older hearing-impaired listeners.
Burk MH; Humes LE; Amos NE; Strauser LE
Ear Hear; 2006 Jun; 27(3):263-78. PubMed ID: 16672795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effect of companding on speech recognition in quiet and noise for listeners with ANSD.
Narne VK; Barman A; Deepthi M
Int J Audiol; 2014 Feb; 53(2):94-100. PubMed ID: 24237041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effect of spectral change enhancement for the hearing impaired using parameter values selected with a genetic algorithm.
Chen J; Baer T; Moore BC
J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 May; 133(5):2910-20. PubMed ID: 23654396
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Binaural model-based dynamic-range compression.
Ernst SMA; Kortlang S; Grimm G; Bisitz T; Kollmeier B; Ewert SD
Int J Audiol; 2018 Jun; 57(sup3):S31-S42. PubMed ID: 29373937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
