These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

196 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24606286)

  • 41. Spectral peak resolution and speech recognition in quiet: normal hearing, hearing impaired, and cochlear implant listeners.
    Henry BA; Turner CW; Behrens A
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2005 Aug; 118(2):1111-21. PubMed ID: 16158665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. A psychophysical evaluation of spectral enhancement.
    DiGiovanni JJ; Nelson PB; Schlauch RS
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2005 Oct; 48(5):1121-35. PubMed ID: 16411801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. The interpretation of speech reception threshold data in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners: steady-state noise.
    Smits C; Festen JM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Nov; 130(5):2987-98. PubMed ID: 22087927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Recognition of asynchronous auditory-visual speech by younger and older listeners: A preliminary study.
    Gordon-Salant S; Yeni-Komshian GH; Fitzgibbons PJ; Willison HM; Freund MS
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Jul; 142(1):151. PubMed ID: 28764460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. The effects of noise vocoding on speech quality perception.
    Anderson MC; Arehart KH; Kates JM
    Hear Res; 2014 Mar; 309():75-83. PubMed ID: 24333929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Speech recognition in fluctuating and continuous maskers: effects of hearing loss and presentation level.
    Summers V; Molis MR
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2004 Apr; 47(2):245-56. PubMed ID: 15157127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Relationship between speech recognition in noise and sparseness.
    Li G; Lutman ME; Wang S; Bleeck S
    Int J Audiol; 2012 Feb; 51(2):75-82. PubMed ID: 22107445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Acoustic, aerodynamic, and perceptual analyses of the voice of cochlear-implanted children.
    Guerrero Lopez HA; Mondain M; Amy de la Bretèque B; Serrafero P; Trottier C; Barkat-Defradas M
    J Voice; 2013 Jul; 27(4):523.e1-17. PubMed ID: 23809572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Typical consonant cluster acquisition in auditory-verbal children with early-identified severe/profound hearing loss.
    Fulcher A; Baker E; Purcell A; Munro N
    Int J Speech Lang Pathol; 2014 Feb; 16(1):69-81. PubMed ID: 24001172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Benefits of audibility for listeners with severe high-frequency hearing loss.
    Simpson A; McDermott HJ; Dowell RC
    Hear Res; 2005 Dec; 210(1-2):42-52. PubMed ID: 16137848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Effect of slow-acting wide dynamic range compression on measures of intelligibility and ratings of speech quality in simulated-loss listeners.
    Rosengard PS; Payton KL; Braida LD
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2005 Jun; 48(3):702-14. PubMed ID: 16197282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Characterizing auditory processing and perception in individual listeners with sensorineural hearing loss.
    Jepsen ML; Dau T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Jan; 129(1):262-81. PubMed ID: 21303008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Relations between frequency selectivity, temporal fine-structure processing, and speech reception in impaired hearing.
    Strelcyk O; Dau T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 May; 125(5):3328-45. PubMed ID: 19425674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. A correlational method to concurrently measure envelope and temporal fine structure weights: effects of age, cochlear pathology, and spectral shaping.
    Fogerty D; Humes LE
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Sep; 132(3):1679-89. PubMed ID: 22978896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Speech based transmission index for all: An intelligibility metric for variable hearing ability.
    Mechergui N; Djaziri-Larbi S; Jaïdane M
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Mar; 141(3):1470. PubMed ID: 28372108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Sources of variability in consonant perception of normal-hearing listeners.
    Zaar J; Dau T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Sep; 138(3):1253-67. PubMed ID: 26428764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. The binaural intelligibility level difference in hearing-impaired listeners: the role of supra-threshold deficits.
    Goverts ST; Houtgast T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 May; 127(5):3073-84. PubMed ID: 21117756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Comparing auditory filter bandwidths, spectral ripple modulation detection, spectral ripple discrimination, and speech recognition: Normal and impaired hearing.
    Davies-Venn E; Nelson P; Souza P
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Jul; 138(1):492-503. PubMed ID: 26233047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. English vowel identification in long-term speech-shaped noise and multi-talker babble for English and Chinese listeners.
    Mi L; Tao S; Wang W; Dong Q; Jin SH; Liu C
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 May; 133(5):EL391-7. PubMed ID: 23656099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. The influence of spectral characteristics of early reflections on speech intelligibility.
    Arweiler I; Buchholz JM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Aug; 130(2):996-1005. PubMed ID: 21877812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.