These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

230 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24606293)

  • 41. Gender difference in the affricate productions of young Seoul Korean speakers.
    Kong EJ; Kang S; Seo M
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Oct; 136(4):EL329-35. PubMed ID: 25324118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Second Language Experience Can Hinder the Discrimination of Nonnative Phonological Contrasts.
    Holliday JJ
    Phonetica; 2016; 73(1):33-51. PubMed ID: 26855077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. The effect of context duration on Mandarin listeners' tone normalization.
    Luo X; Ashmore KB
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Aug; 136(2):EL109-15. PubMed ID: 25096133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. The role of segmental and durational cues in the processing of reduced words.
    van de Ven M; Ernestus M
    Lang Speech; 2018 Sep; 61(3):358-383. PubMed ID: 28870139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Cross-language acoustic similarity predicts perceptual assimilation of Canadian English and Canadian French vowels.
    Escudero P; Vasiliev P
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Nov; 130(5):EL277-83. PubMed ID: 22088028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Relative contributions of formants to the intelligibility of sine-wave sentences in Mandarin Chinese.
    Han Y; Chen F
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Jun; 141(6):EL495. PubMed ID: 28618801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Attentional Modulation and Individual Differences in Explaining the Changing Role of Fundamental Frequency in Korean Laryngeal Stop Perception.
    Kong EJ; Lee H
    Lang Speech; 2018 Sep; 61(3):384-408. PubMed ID: 28937301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Perceptual confusions of American-English vowels and consonants by native Arabic bilinguals.
    Shafiro V; Levy ES; Khamis-Dakwar R; Kharkhurin A
    Lang Speech; 2013 Jun; 56(Pt 2):145-61. PubMed ID: 23905278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Linguistic experience and audio-visual perception of non-native fricatives.
    Wang Y; Behne DM; Jiang H
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Sep; 124(3):1716-26. PubMed ID: 19045662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Cross-language specialization in phonetic processing: English and Hindi perception of /w/-/v/ speech and nonspeech.
    Iverson P; Wagner A; Pinet M; Rosen S
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Nov; 130(5):EL297-303. PubMed ID: 22088031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Effects of native language on perceptual sensitivity to phonetic cues.
    Brandmeyer A; Desain PW; McQueen JM
    Neuroreport; 2012 Aug; 23(11):653-7. PubMed ID: 22692551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Effects of L1 prosody on segmental contrast in L2: The case of English stop voicing contrast produced by Korean speakers.
    Choi J; Kim S; Cho T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 Mar; 139(3):EL76-82. PubMed ID: 27036291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Visual speech information: a help or hindrance in perceptual processing of dysarthric speech.
    Borrie SA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Mar; 137(3):1473-80. PubMed ID: 25786958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Perception of Japanese temporally-cued contrasts by American English listeners.
    Hisagi M; Strange W
    Lang Speech; 2011 Jun; 54(Pt 2):241-64. PubMed ID: 21848082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Talker-listener accent interactions in speech-in-noise recognition: effects of prosodic manipulation as a function of language experience.
    Pinet M; Iverson P
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Sep; 128(3):1357-65. PubMed ID: 20815470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Reduced efficiency of audiovisual integration for nonnative speech.
    Yi HG; Phelps JE; Smiljanic R; Chandrasekaran B
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Nov; 134(5):EL387-93. PubMed ID: 24181980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Perceptual development of phoneme contrasts: how sensitivity changes along acoustic dimensions that contrast phoneme categories.
    Heeren WF; Schouten ME
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Oct; 124(4):2291-302. PubMed ID: 19062867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Impact of talker variability on word recognition in non-native listeners.
    van Dommelen WA; Hazan V
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Sep; 132(3):1690-9. PubMed ID: 22978897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Production of phonetic and phonological contrast by heritage speakers of Mandarin.
    Chang CB; Yao Y; Haynes EF; Rhodes R
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Jun; 129(6):3964-80. PubMed ID: 21682418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Flexible cue use in nonnative phonetic categorization.
    Broersma M
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Aug; 124(2):712-5. PubMed ID: 18681562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.