These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

178 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24606310)

  • 1. Musician effect in cochlear implant simulated gender categorization.
    Fuller CD; Galvin JJ; Free RH; Başkent D
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Mar; 135(3):EL159-65. PubMed ID: 24606310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The musician effect: does it persist under degraded pitch conditions of cochlear implant simulations?
    Fuller CD; Galvin JJ; Maat B; Free RH; Başkent D
    Front Neurosci; 2014; 8():179. PubMed ID: 25071428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Improved perception of speech in noise and Mandarin tones with acoustic simulations of harmonic coding for cochlear implants.
    Li X; Nie K; Imennov NS; Won JH; Drennan WR; Rubinstein JT; Atlas LE
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Nov; 132(5):3387-98. PubMed ID: 23145619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Impact of room acoustic parameters on speech and music perception among participants with cochlear implants.
    Eurich B; Klenzner T; Oehler M
    Hear Res; 2019 Jun; 377():122-132. PubMed ID: 30933704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Musician advantage for speech-on-speech perception.
    Başkent D; Gaudrain E
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 Mar; 139(3):EL51-6. PubMed ID: 27036287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Voice gender differences and separation of simultaneous talkers in cochlear implant users with residual hearing.
    Visram AS; Kluk K; McKay CM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Aug; 132(2):EL135-41. PubMed ID: 22894312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of bimodal and bilateral cochlear implant users on speech recognition with competing talker, music perception, affective prosody discrimination, and talker identification.
    Cullington HE; Zeng FG
    Ear Hear; 2011 Feb; 32(1):16-30. PubMed ID: 21178567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Gaps-in-noise detection and gender identification from noise-vocoded vowel segments: Comparing performance of active musicians to non-musicians.
    Donai JJ; Jennings MB
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 May; 139(5):EL128. PubMed ID: 27250197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Voice gender discrimination provides a measure of more than pitch-related perception in cochlear implant users.
    Li T; Fu QJ
    Int J Audiol; 2011 Aug; 50(8):498-502. PubMed ID: 21696330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Spatial Release From Masking in Simulated Cochlear Implant Users With and Without Access to Low-Frequency Acoustic Hearing.
    Williges B; Dietz M; Hohmann V; Jürgens T
    Trends Hear; 2015 Dec; 19():. PubMed ID: 26721918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Fundamental frequency is critical to speech perception in noise in combined acoustic and electric hearing.
    Carroll J; Tiaden S; Zeng FG
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Oct; 130(4):2054-62. PubMed ID: 21973360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Masking release and the contribution of obstruent consonants on speech recognition in noise by cochlear implant users.
    Li N; Loizou PC
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Sep; 128(3):1262-71. PubMed ID: 20815461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Masking release with changing fundamental frequency: Electric acoustic stimulation resembles normal hearing subjects.
    Auinger AB; Riss D; Liepins R; Rader T; Keck T; Keintzel T; Kaider A; Baumgartner WD; Gstoettner W; Arnoldner C
    Hear Res; 2017 Jul; 350():226-234. PubMed ID: 28527538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Similar abilities of musicians and non-musicians to segregate voices by fundamental frequency.
    Deroche MLD; Limb CJ; Chatterjee M; Gracco VL
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Oct; 142(4):1739. PubMed ID: 29092612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Musician effect on perception of spectro-temporally degraded speech, vocal emotion, and music in young adolescents.
    Başkent D; Fuller CD; Galvin JJ; Schepel L; Gaudrain E; Free RH
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2018 May; 143(5):EL311. PubMed ID: 29857757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effects of simulated cochlear-implant processing on speech reception in fluctuating maskers.
    Qin MK; Oxenham AJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2003 Jul; 114(1):446-54. PubMed ID: 12880055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Simultaneous suppression of noise and reverberation in cochlear implants using a ratio masking strategy.
    Hazrati O; Sadjadi SO; Loizou PC; Hansen JH
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Nov; 134(5):3759-65. PubMed ID: 24180786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Multimodal and Spectral Degradation Effects on Speech and Emotion Recognition in Adult Listeners.
    Ritter C; Vongpaisal T
    Trends Hear; 2018; 22():2331216518804966. PubMed ID: 30378469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The effects of binaural spectral resolution mismatch on Mandarin speech perception in simulated electric hearing.
    Chen F; Wong LL; Tahmina Q; Azimi B; Hu Y
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Aug; 132(2):EL142-8. PubMed ID: 22894313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Sentence intelligibility during segmental interruption and masking by speech-modulated noise: Effects of age and hearing loss.
    Fogerty D; Ahlstrom JB; Bologna WJ; Dubno JR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Jun; 137(6):3487-501. PubMed ID: 26093436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.