BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

181 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24606310)

  • 1. Musician effect in cochlear implant simulated gender categorization.
    Fuller CD; Galvin JJ; Free RH; Başkent D
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Mar; 135(3):EL159-65. PubMed ID: 24606310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The musician effect: does it persist under degraded pitch conditions of cochlear implant simulations?
    Fuller CD; Galvin JJ; Maat B; Free RH; Başkent D
    Front Neurosci; 2014; 8():179. PubMed ID: 25071428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Improved perception of speech in noise and Mandarin tones with acoustic simulations of harmonic coding for cochlear implants.
    Li X; Nie K; Imennov NS; Won JH; Drennan WR; Rubinstein JT; Atlas LE
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Nov; 132(5):3387-98. PubMed ID: 23145619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Impact of room acoustic parameters on speech and music perception among participants with cochlear implants.
    Eurich B; Klenzner T; Oehler M
    Hear Res; 2019 Jun; 377():122-132. PubMed ID: 30933704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Musician advantage for speech-on-speech perception.
    Başkent D; Gaudrain E
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 Mar; 139(3):EL51-6. PubMed ID: 27036287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Voice gender differences and separation of simultaneous talkers in cochlear implant users with residual hearing.
    Visram AS; Kluk K; McKay CM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Aug; 132(2):EL135-41. PubMed ID: 22894312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of bimodal and bilateral cochlear implant users on speech recognition with competing talker, music perception, affective prosody discrimination, and talker identification.
    Cullington HE; Zeng FG
    Ear Hear; 2011 Feb; 32(1):16-30. PubMed ID: 21178567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Gaps-in-noise detection and gender identification from noise-vocoded vowel segments: Comparing performance of active musicians to non-musicians.
    Donai JJ; Jennings MB
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 May; 139(5):EL128. PubMed ID: 27250197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Voice gender discrimination provides a measure of more than pitch-related perception in cochlear implant users.
    Li T; Fu QJ
    Int J Audiol; 2011 Aug; 50(8):498-502. PubMed ID: 21696330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Spatial Release From Masking in Simulated Cochlear Implant Users With and Without Access to Low-Frequency Acoustic Hearing.
    Williges B; Dietz M; Hohmann V; Jürgens T
    Trends Hear; 2015 Dec; 19():. PubMed ID: 26721918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Fundamental frequency is critical to speech perception in noise in combined acoustic and electric hearing.
    Carroll J; Tiaden S; Zeng FG
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Oct; 130(4):2054-62. PubMed ID: 21973360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Masking release and the contribution of obstruent consonants on speech recognition in noise by cochlear implant users.
    Li N; Loizou PC
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Sep; 128(3):1262-71. PubMed ID: 20815461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Masking release with changing fundamental frequency: Electric acoustic stimulation resembles normal hearing subjects.
    Auinger AB; Riss D; Liepins R; Rader T; Keck T; Keintzel T; Kaider A; Baumgartner WD; Gstoettner W; Arnoldner C
    Hear Res; 2017 Jul; 350():226-234. PubMed ID: 28527538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Similar abilities of musicians and non-musicians to segregate voices by fundamental frequency.
    Deroche MLD; Limb CJ; Chatterjee M; Gracco VL
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Oct; 142(4):1739. PubMed ID: 29092612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Musician effect on perception of spectro-temporally degraded speech, vocal emotion, and music in young adolescents.
    Başkent D; Fuller CD; Galvin JJ; Schepel L; Gaudrain E; Free RH
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2018 May; 143(5):EL311. PubMed ID: 29857757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effects of simulated cochlear-implant processing on speech reception in fluctuating maskers.
    Qin MK; Oxenham AJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2003 Jul; 114(1):446-54. PubMed ID: 12880055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Simultaneous suppression of noise and reverberation in cochlear implants using a ratio masking strategy.
    Hazrati O; Sadjadi SO; Loizou PC; Hansen JH
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Nov; 134(5):3759-65. PubMed ID: 24180786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Multimodal and Spectral Degradation Effects on Speech and Emotion Recognition in Adult Listeners.
    Ritter C; Vongpaisal T
    Trends Hear; 2018; 22():2331216518804966. PubMed ID: 30378469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The effects of binaural spectral resolution mismatch on Mandarin speech perception in simulated electric hearing.
    Chen F; Wong LL; Tahmina Q; Azimi B; Hu Y
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Aug; 132(2):EL142-8. PubMed ID: 22894313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Sentence intelligibility during segmental interruption and masking by speech-modulated noise: Effects of age and hearing loss.
    Fogerty D; Ahlstrom JB; Bologna WJ; Dubno JR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Jun; 137(6):3487-501. PubMed ID: 26093436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.