524 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24606544)
1. A clinical study of electrophysiological correlates of behavioural comfort levels in cochlear implantees.
Raghunandhan S; Ravikumar A; Kameswaran M; Mandke K; Ranjith R
Cochlear Implants Int; 2014 May; 15(3):145-60. PubMed ID: 24606544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Electrophysiological Correlates of Behavioral Comfort Levels in Cochlear Implantees: A Prospective Study.
Raghunandhan S; Ravikumar A; Kameswaran M; Mandke K; Ranjith R
Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2015 Sep; 67(3):210-22. PubMed ID: 26405653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Postoperative objective detecting techniques for cochlear implant children with inner ear malformation.
Qiao XF; Li X; Zhang QW; Li TL; Wang D
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2017 Nov; 102():1-6. PubMed ID: 29106852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Cochlear implantees: Analysis of behavioral and objective measures for a clinical population of various age groups.
Greisiger R; Shallop JK; Hol PK; Elle OJ; Jablonski GE
Cochlear Implants Int; 2015; 16 Suppl 4():1-19. PubMed ID: 26642899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparisons between neural response imaging thresholds, electrically evoked auditory reflex thresholds and most comfortable loudness levels in CII bionic ear users with HiResolution sound processing strategies.
Han DM; Chen XQ; Zhao XT; Kong Y; Li YX; Liu S; Liu B; Mo LY
Acta Otolaryngol; 2005 Jul; 125(7):732-5. PubMed ID: 16012035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Prediction of behavioral MCL using electrophysiological responses in children using MED-EL implant.
Thangaraj M; Arunachalam R; Gore M; AjithKumar U
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2023 Sep; 172():111696. PubMed ID: 37563011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of electrically evoked compound action potential thresholds and loudness estimates for the stimuli used to program the Advanced Bionics cochlear implant.
Jeon EK; Brown CJ; Etler CP; O'Brien S; Chiou LK; Abbas PJ
J Am Acad Audiol; 2010 Jan; 21(1):16-27. PubMed ID: 20085196
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The pattern of auditory brainstem response wave V maturation in cochlear-implanted children.
Thai-Van H; Cozma S; Boutitie F; Disant F; Truy E; Collet L
Clin Neurophysiol; 2007 Mar; 118(3):676-89. PubMed ID: 17223382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Multicentre investigation on electrically evoked compound action potential and stapedius reflex: how do these objective measures relate to implant programming parameters?
Van Den Abbeele T; Noël-Petroff N; Akin I; Caner G; Olgun L; Guiraud J; Truy E; Attias J; Raveh E; Belgin E; Sennaroglu G; Basta D; Ernst A; Martini A; Rosignoli M; Levi H; Elidan J; Benghalem A; Amstutz-Montadert I; Lerosey Y; De Vel E; Dhooge I; Hildesheimer M; Kronenberg J; Arnold L
Cochlear Implants Int; 2012 Feb; 13(1):26-34. PubMed ID: 22340749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Optimizing fitting in children using objective measures such as neural response imaging and electrically evoked stapedius reflex threshold.
Caner G; Olgun L; Gültekin G; Balaban M
Otol Neurotol; 2007 Aug; 28(5):637-40. PubMed ID: 17667772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Toward a battery of behavioral and objective measures to achieve optimal cochlear implant stimulation levels in children.
Gordon KA; Papsin BC; Harrison RV
Ear Hear; 2004 Oct; 25(5):447-63. PubMed ID: 15599192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Activity-dependent developmental plasticity of the auditory brain stem in children who use cochlear implants.
Gordon KA; Papsin BC; Harrison RV
Ear Hear; 2003 Dec; 24(6):485-500. PubMed ID: 14663348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Using evoked compound action potentials to assess activation of electrodes and predict C-levels in the Tempo+ cochlear implant speech processor.
Alvarez I; de la Torre A; Sainz M; Roldán C; Schoesser H; Spitzer P
Ear Hear; 2010 Feb; 31(1):134-45. PubMed ID: 19838116
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluation of objective test techniques in cochlear implant users with inner ear malformations.
Cinar BC; Atas A; Sennaroglu G; Sennaroglu L
Otol Neurotol; 2011 Sep; 32(7):1065-74. PubMed ID: 21817941
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Electrically evoked amplitude modulation following response in cochlear implant candidates: comparison with auditory nerve response telemetry, subjective electrical stimulation, and speech perception.
Hirschfelder A; Gräbel S; Olze H
Otol Neurotol; 2012 Aug; 33(6):968-75. PubMed ID: 22772009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Intra-operative recordings of electrically evoked auditory nerve action potentials in young children by use of neural response telemetry with the nucleus C124M cochlear implant.
Mason SM; Cope Y; Garnham J; O'Donoghue GM; Gibbin KP
Br J Audiol; 2001 Aug; 35(4):225-35. PubMed ID: 11694097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Relation between neural response telemetry thresholds, T- and C-levels, and loudness judgments in 12 adult nucleus 24 cochlear implant recipients.
Potts LG; Skinner MW; Gotter BD; Strube MJ; Brenner CA
Ear Hear; 2007 Aug; 28(4):495-511. PubMed ID: 17609612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Identifying cochlear implant channels with poor electrode-neuron interfaces: electrically evoked auditory brain stem responses measured with the partial tripolar configuration.
Bierer JA; Faulkner KF; Tremblay KL
Ear Hear; 2011; 32(4):436-44. PubMed ID: 21178633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The relationship between EAP and EABR thresholds and levels used to program the nucleus 24 speech processor: data from adults.
Brown CJ; Hughes ML; Luk B; Abbas PJ; Wolaver A; Gervais J
Ear Hear; 2000 Apr; 21(2):151-63. PubMed ID: 10777022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Measures of the electrically evoked compound action potential threshold and slope in HiRes 90K(TM) users.
Nehmé A; El Zir E; Moukarzel N; Haidar H; Vanpoucke F; Arnold L
Cochlear Implants Int; 2014 Jan; 15(1):53-60. PubMed ID: 24456380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
