These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24606788)
21. Surgery Versus Nonsurgical Treatment of Lumbar Spinal Stenosis. Robertson PA; Sears WR; Cunningham JE Ann Intern Med; 2015 Sep; 163(5):396-7. PubMed ID: 26322701 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Surgery Versus Nonsurgical Treatment of Lumbar Spinal Stenosis. Barrer SJ Ann Intern Med; 2015 Sep; 163(5):396. PubMed ID: 26322700 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Surgery Versus Nonsurgical Treatment of Lumbar Spinal Stenosis. Masi AT; Betts S Ann Intern Med; 2015 Sep; 163(5):397. PubMed ID: 26322702 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Surgery Versus Nonsurgical Treatment of Lumbar Spinal Stenosis. Delitto A; Piva SR; Moore CG; Welch WC Ann Intern Med; 2015 Sep; 163(5):397-8. PubMed ID: 26322703 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis: informed patient preferences should weigh heavily. Katz JN Ann Intern Med; 2015 Apr; 162(7):518-9. PubMed ID: 25844999 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Extended Length of Stay After Lumbar Spine Surgery: Sick Patients, Postoperative Complications, or Practice Style Differences Among Hospitals and Physicians? Adogwa O; Lilly DT; Khalid S; Desai SA; Vuong VD; Davison MA; Ouyang B; Bagley CA; Cheng J World Neurosurg; 2019 Mar; 123():e734-e739. PubMed ID: 30579024 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Regional and Institutional Practice Variations in Decompressive Spine Surgery for Patients with Penetrating Spinal Injury in the United States. Soni P; Rosenbaum BP; Kelly ML World Neurosurg; 2020 May; 137():e263-e268. PubMed ID: 32004739 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Rationale for the Surgical Treatment of Lumbar Degenerative Spondylolisthesis. Schroeder GD; Kepler CK; Kurd MF; Vaccaro AR; Hsu WK; Patel AA; Savage JW Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2015 Nov; 40(21):E1161-6. PubMed ID: 26274525 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis with spinal stenosis: a prospective long-term study comparing fusion and pseudarthrosis. Kornblum MB; Fischgrund JS; Herkowitz HN; Abraham DA; Berkower DL; Ditkoff JS Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2004 Apr; 29(7):726-33; discussion 733-4. PubMed ID: 15087793 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Bronchial hygiene techniques in patients on mechanical ventilation: what are used and why? Matilde INE; Eid RAC; Nunes AF; Ambrozin ARP; Moura RH; Carnieli-Cazati D; Timenetsky KT Einstein (Sao Paulo); 2018; 16(1):eAO3856. PubMed ID: 29694610 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Controversies in cervical discectomy and fusion: practice patterns among Canadian surgeons. Pickett GE; Van Soelen J; Duggal N Can J Neurol Sci; 2004 Nov; 31(4):478-83. PubMed ID: 15595251 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Clinical outcome of microendoscopic posterior decompression for spinal stenosis associated with degenerative spondylolisthesis--minimum 2-year outcome of 37 patients. Ikuta K; Tono O; Oga M Minim Invasive Neurosurg; 2008 Oct; 51(5):267-71. PubMed ID: 18855290 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Decompression Surgery Alone Versus Decompression Plus Fusion in Symptomatic Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: A Swiss Prospective Multicenter Cohort Study With 3 Years of Follow-up. Ulrich NH; Burgstaller JM; Pichierri G; Wertli MM; Farshad M; Porchet F; Steurer J; Held U; Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2017 Sep; 42(18):E1077-E1086. PubMed ID: 28092340 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Cost per quality-adjusted life year gained of revision neural decompression and instrumented fusion for same-level recurrent lumbar stenosis: defining the value of surgical intervention. Adogwa O; Parker SL; Shau DN; Mendenhall SK; Aaronson O; Cheng JS; Devin CJ; McGirt MJ J Neurosurg Spine; 2012 Feb; 16(2):135-40. PubMed ID: 22054639 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Posterolateral fusion combined with posterior decompression shows superiority in the treatment of severe lumbar spinal stenosis without lumbar disc protrusion or prolapse: a retrospective cohort study. Wang C; Yin X; Zhang L; Xue X; Xiang Y; Jin H; Liu M; Zhao J J Orthop Surg Res; 2020 Jan; 15(1):26. PubMed ID: 31969171 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Nationwide trends in the surgical management of lumbar spinal stenosis. Bae HW; Rajaee SS; Kanim LE Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 May; 38(11):916-26. PubMed ID: 23324922 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Interspinous process decompression system (X STOP) device affords superior outcomes and equal safety to nonoperative therapy. Weiner BK Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2005 Dec; 30(24):2846-7. PubMed ID: 16371916 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Summaries for patients. Surgery versus physical therapy for treating lumbar spinal stenosis. Ann Intern Med; 2015 Apr; 162(7):. PubMed ID: 25845016 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Factors predicting hospital stay, operative time, blood loss, and transfusion in patients undergoing revision posterior lumbar spine decompression, fusion, and segmental instrumentation. Zheng F; Cammisa FP; Sandhu HS; Girardi FP; Khan SN Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2002 Apr; 27(8):818-24. PubMed ID: 11935103 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]