These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

297 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24606972)

  • 1. Analysis and meta-analysis of single-case designs with a standardized mean difference statistic: a primer and applications.
    Shadish WR; Hedges LV; Pustejovsky JE
    J Sch Psychol; 2014 Apr; 52(2):123-47. PubMed ID: 24606972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Analysis and meta-analysis of single-case designs: an introduction.
    Shadish WR
    J Sch Psychol; 2014 Apr; 52(2):109-22. PubMed ID: 24606971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A d-statistic for single-case designs that is equivalent to the usual between-groups d-statistic.
    Shadish WR; Hedges LV; Pustejovsky JE; Boyajian JG; Sullivan KJ; Andrade A; Barrientos JL
    Neuropsychol Rehabil; 2014; 24(3-4):528-53. PubMed ID: 23862576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A standardized mean difference effect size for multiple baseline designs across individuals.
    Hedges LV; Pustejovsky JE; Shadish WR
    Res Synth Methods; 2013 Dec; 4(4):324-41. PubMed ID: 26053946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. An effect size measure and Bayesian analysis of single-case designs.
    Swaminathan H; Rogers HJ; Horner RH
    J Sch Psychol; 2014 Apr; 52(2):213-30. PubMed ID: 24606976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Analyzing data from single-case designs using multilevel models: new applications and some agenda items for future research.
    Shadish WR; Kyse EN; Rindskopf DM
    Psychol Methods; 2013 Sep; 18(3):385-405. PubMed ID: 23834421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A demonstration of how to do a meta-analysis that combines single-case designs with between-groups experiments: The effects of choice making on challenging behaviors performed by people with disabilities.
    Zelinsky NAM; Shadish W
    Dev Neurorehabil; 2018 May; 21(4):266-278. PubMed ID: 26809945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Meta- and statistical analysis of single-case intervention research data: quantitative gifts and a wish list.
    Kratochwill TR; Levin JR
    J Sch Psychol; 2014 Apr; 52(2):231-5. PubMed ID: 24606977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Multivariate meta-analysis: a robust approach based on the theory of U-statistic.
    Ma Y; Mazumdar M
    Stat Med; 2011 Oct; 30(24):2911-29. PubMed ID: 21830230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. It has been said that, "There are three degrees of falsehoods: lies, damn lies, and statistics".
    Fisher WW; Lerman DC
    J Sch Psychol; 2014 Apr; 52(2):243-8. PubMed ID: 24606979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The metric comparability of meta-analytic effect-size estimators from factorial designs.
    Gillett R
    Psychol Methods; 2003 Dec; 8(4):419-33. PubMed ID: 14664680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. From a single-level analysis to a multilevel analysis of single-case experimental designs.
    Moeyaert M; Ferron JM; Beretvas SN; Van den Noortgate W
    J Sch Psychol; 2014 Apr; 52(2):191-211. PubMed ID: 24606975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A standardized mean difference effect size for single case designs.
    Hedges LV; Pustejovsky JE; Shadish WR
    Res Synth Methods; 2012 Sep; 3(3):224-39. PubMed ID: 26062165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Using generalized additive (mixed) models to analyze single case designs.
    Shadish WR; Zuur AF; Sullivan KJ
    J Sch Psychol; 2014 Apr; 52(2):149-78. PubMed ID: 24606973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Meta-analysis with standardized effect sizes from multilevel and latent growth models.
    Feingold A
    J Consult Clin Psychol; 2017 Mar; 85(3):262-266. PubMed ID: 28068118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Problems caused by heterogeneity in meta-analysis: a case study of acupuncture trials.
    Prady SL; Burch J; Crouch S; MacPherson H
    Acupunct Med; 2014 Feb; 32(1):56-61. PubMed ID: 24140758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Robust variance estimation with dependent effect sizes: practical considerations including a software tutorial in Stata and spss.
    Tanner-Smith EE; Tipton E
    Res Synth Methods; 2014 Mar; 5(1):13-30. PubMed ID: 26054023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Statistics for quantifying heterogeneity in univariate and bivariate meta-analyses of binary data: the case of meta-analyses of diagnostic accuracy.
    Zhou Y; Dendukuri N
    Stat Med; 2014 Jul; 33(16):2701-17. PubMed ID: 24903142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Meta-analysis of the Italian studies on short-term effects of air pollution].
    Biggeri A; Bellini P; Terracini B;
    Epidemiol Prev; 2001; 25(2 Suppl):1-71. PubMed ID: 11515188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. How meta-analysis increases statistical power.
    Cohn LD; Becker BJ
    Psychol Methods; 2003 Sep; 8(3):243-53. PubMed ID: 14596489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.