These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

101 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24607006)

  • 1. Investigation of different cage designs and mechano-regulation algorithms in the lumbar interbody fusion process - a finite element analysis.
    Postigo S; Schmidt H; Rohlmann A; Putzier M; Simón A; Duda G; Checa S
    J Biomech; 2014 Apr; 47(6):1514-9. PubMed ID: 24607006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Computational analyses of different intervertebral cages for lumbar spinal fusion.
    Bashkuev M; Checa S; Postigo S; Duda G; Schmidt H
    J Biomech; 2015 Sep; 48(12):3274-82. PubMed ID: 26162547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Analysis of stress distribution in lumbar interbody fusion.
    Kumar N; Judith MR; Kumar A; Mishra V; Robert MC
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2005 Aug; 30(15):1731-5. PubMed ID: 16094274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Biomechanical Analysis of Porous Additive Manufactured Cages for Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Finite Element Analysis.
    Zhang Z; Li H; Fogel GR; Liao Z; Li Y; Liu W
    World Neurosurg; 2018 Mar; 111():e581-e591. PubMed ID: 29288855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Design and finite-element evaluation of a versatile assembled lumbar interbody fusion cage.
    Ding JY; Qian S; Wan L; Huang B; Wang LG; Zhou Y
    Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2010 Apr; 130(4):565-71. PubMed ID: 20140621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Differences in 3D vs. 2D analysis in lumbar spinal fusion simulations.
    Hsu HW; Bashkuev M; Pumberger M; Schmidt H
    J Biomech; 2018 Apr; 72():262-267. PubMed ID: 29559240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Computational comparison of three posterior lumbar interbody fusion techniques by using porous titanium interbody cages with 50% porosity.
    Lee YH; Chung CJ; Wang CW; Peng YT; Chang CH; Chen CH; Chen YN; Li CT
    Comput Biol Med; 2016 Apr; 71():35-45. PubMed ID: 26874064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Anterior Bridging Bone in a Newly Designed Cage for Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Radiographic and Finite Element Analysis.
    Lee J; Chang SH; Cho HC; Song KS
    World Neurosurg; 2021 Oct; 154():e389-e397. PubMed ID: 34284159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Biomechanical Evaluation of a Novel Apatite-Wollastonite Ceramic Cage Design for Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Finite Element Model Study.
    Bozkurt C; Şenköylü A; Aktaş E; Sarıkaya B; Sipahioğlu S; Gürbüz R; Timuçin M
    Biomed Res Int; 2018; 2018():4152543. PubMed ID: 29581974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Factors influencing stresses in the lumbar spine after the insertion of intervertebral cages: finite element analysis.
    Polikeit A; Ferguson SJ; Nolte LP; Orr TE
    Eur Spine J; 2003 Aug; 12(4):413-20. PubMed ID: 12955610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Biomechanical comparison of transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with 1 or 2 cages by finite-element analysis.
    Xu H; Ju W; Xu N; Zhang X; Zhu X; Zhu L; Qian X; Wen F; Wu W; Jiang F
    Neurosurgery; 2013 Dec; 73(2 Suppl Operative):ons198-205; discussion ons205. PubMed ID: 23632763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Optimization Design of Interbody Fusion Cage withDifferent Bone Densities Printed in 3D].
    Liu W; Zhao J; Wang Y; Li S
    Zhongguo Yi Liao Qi Xie Za Zhi; 2024 Jan; 48(1):20-25. PubMed ID: 38384212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Interbody fusion cage design using integrated global layout and local microstructure topology optimization.
    Lin CY; Hsiao CC; Chen PQ; Hollister SJ
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2004 Aug; 29(16):1747-54. PubMed ID: 15303018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of cage application modality in posterior lumbar interbody fusion with posterior instrumentation--a finite element study.
    Tsuang YH; Chiang YF; Hung CY; Wei HW; Huang CH; Cheng CK
    Med Eng Phys; 2009 Jun; 31(5):565-70. PubMed ID: 19117789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Influence of cage geometry on sagittal alignment in instrumented posterior lumbar interbody fusion.
    Gödde S; Fritsch E; Dienst M; Kohn D
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Aug; 28(15):1693-9. PubMed ID: 12897494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Finite element analysis of anterior lumbar interbody fusion: threaded cylindrical cage and pedicle screw fixation.
    Kim Y
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Nov; 32(23):2558-68. PubMed ID: 17978654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Analysis of a Unilateral Bridging Cage for Lumbar Interbody Fusion: 2-Year Clinical Results and Fusion Rate with a Focus on Subsidence.
    Heinz von der Hoeh N; Villa T; Galbusera F; Voelker A; Spiegl UA; Jarvers JS; Heyde CE
    World Neurosurg; 2018 Aug; 116():e308-e314. PubMed ID: 29738859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Porous biodegradable lumbar interbody fusion cage design and fabrication using integrated global-local topology optimization with laser sintering.
    Kang H; Hollister SJ; La Marca F; Park P; Lin CY
    J Biomech Eng; 2013 Oct; 135(10):101013-8. PubMed ID: 23897113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Biomechanical Analysis of Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion Constructs with Various Fixation Options: Based on a Validated Finite Element Model.
    Zhang Z; Fogel GR; Liao Z; Sun Y; Liu W
    World Neurosurg; 2018 Jun; 114():e1120-e1129. PubMed ID: 29609081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Finite element analysis of minimal invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.
    Zhao C; Wang X; Chen C; Kang Y
    Cell Biochem Biophys; 2014 Sep; 70(1):609-13. PubMed ID: 24782059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.