These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

229 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24607450)

  • 21. [Bibliometric analysis on bioremediation of organic contaminated soil and groundwater based on Web of Science database].
    Wang Q; Yang Z; Yin L; Song X; Wei C; Li Y; Zhai W
    Sheng Wu Gong Cheng Xue Bao; 2021 Oct; 37(10):3549-3564. PubMed ID: 34708610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Natural attenuation processes for remediation of arsenic contaminated soils and groundwater.
    Wang S; Mulligan CN
    J Hazard Mater; 2006 Dec; 138(3):459-70. PubMed ID: 17049728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Surfactant-enhanced remediation of organic contaminated soil and water.
    Paria S
    Adv Colloid Interface Sci; 2008 Apr; 138(1):24-58. PubMed ID: 18154747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Incorporating sediment stability within the management of contaminated sediment sites: a synthesis approach.
    Bohlen WF; Erickson MJ
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2006 Jan; 2(1):24-8. PubMed ID: 16640313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. A new molecular approach based on qPCR for the quantification of fecal bacteria in contaminated marine sediments.
    Luna GM; Dell'Anno A; Pietrangeli B; Danovaro R
    J Biotechnol; 2012 Feb; 157(4):446-53. PubMed ID: 21839120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Evaluation of natural and enhanced PCP biodegradation at a former pesticide manufacturing plant.
    Kao CM; Chai CT; Liu JK; Yeh TY; Chen KF; Chen SC
    Water Res; 2004 Feb; 38(3):663-72. PubMed ID: 14723935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Multiple lines of evidence to demonstrate vinyl chloride aerobic biodegradation in the vadose zone, and factors controlling rates.
    Patterson BM; Aravena R; Davis GB; Furness AJ; Bastow TP; Bouchard D
    J Contam Hydrol; 2013 Oct; 153():69-77. PubMed ID: 23999077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Critical review of decision support tools for sustainability assessment of site remediation options.
    Huysegoms L; Cappuyns V
    J Environ Manage; 2017 Jul; 196():278-296. PubMed ID: 28288362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Emerging high-throughput approaches to analyze bioremediation of sites contaminated with hazardous and/or recalcitrant wastes.
    Stenuit B; Eyers L; Schuler L; Agathos SN; George I
    Biotechnol Adv; 2008; 26(6):561-75. PubMed ID: 18725284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. A quantitative framework for understanding complex interactions between competing interfacial processes and in situ biodegradation.
    Johnson MA; Song X; Seagren EA
    J Contam Hydrol; 2013 Mar; 146():16-36. PubMed ID: 23396269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Characterizing the intrinsic bioremediation potential of 1,4-dioxane and trichloroethene using innovative environmental diagnostic tools.
    Chiang SY; Mora R; Diguiseppi WH; Davis G; Sublette K; Gedalanga P; Mahendra S
    J Environ Monit; 2012 Sep; 14(9):2317-26. PubMed ID: 22825917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Toward quantifying water pollution abatement in response to installing buffers on crop land.
    Dosskey MG
    Environ Manage; 2001 Nov; 28(5):577-98. PubMed ID: 11568840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Stimulation of aerobic degradation of bentazone, mecoprop and dichlorprop by oxygen addition to aquifer sediment.
    Levi S; Hybel AM; Bjerg PL; Albrechtsen HJ
    Sci Total Environ; 2014 Mar; 473-474():667-75. PubMed ID: 24412734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Ex situ bioremediation of oil-contaminated soil.
    Lin TC; Pan PT; Cheng SS
    J Hazard Mater; 2010 Apr; 176(1-3):27-34. PubMed ID: 20053499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Soil plant microbe interactions in phytoremediation.
    Karthikeyan R; Kulakow PA
    Adv Biochem Eng Biotechnol; 2003; 78():51-74. PubMed ID: 12674398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Dredging processes and remedy effectiveness: Relationship to the 4 Rs of environmental dredging.
    Bridges TS; Gustavson KE; Schroeder P; Ells SJ; Hayes D; Nadeau SC; Palermo MR; Patmont C
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2010 Oct; 6(4):619-30. PubMed ID: 20872643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. 3D dynamic model empowering the knowledge of the decontamination mechanisms and controlling the complex remediation strategy of a contaminated industrial site.
    Ciampi P; Esposito C; Bartsch E; Alesi EJ; Petrangeli Papini M
    Sci Total Environ; 2021 Nov; 793():148649. PubMed ID: 34328981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Uranium release from sediment to groundwater: influence of water chemistry and insights into release mechanisms.
    Alam MS; Cheng T
    J Contam Hydrol; 2014 Aug; 164():72-87. PubMed ID: 24954631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Innovative technologies for contaminated site remediation: focus on bioremediation.
    Gabriel PF
    J Air Waste Manage Assoc; 1991 Dec; 41(12):1657-60. PubMed ID: 1799447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Laboratory-scale in situ bioremediation in heterogeneous porous media: biokinetics-limited scenario.
    Song X; Hong E; Seagren EA
    J Contam Hydrol; 2014 Mar; 158():78-92. PubMed ID: 24508684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.