These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24608216)

  • 1. Impression of multiple implants using photogrammetry: description of technique and case presentation.
    Peñarrocha-Oltra D; Agustín-Panadero R; Bagán L; Giménez B; Peñarrocha M
    Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal; 2014 Jul; 19(4):e366-71. PubMed ID: 24608216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Maxillary Full-Arch Immediately Loaded Implant-Supported Fixed Prosthesis Designed and Produced by Photogrammetry and Digital Printing: A Clinical Report.
    Peñarrocha-Oltra D; Agustín-Panadero R; Pradíes G; Gomar-Vercher S; Peñarrocha-Diago M
    J Prosthodont; 2017 Jan; 26(1):75-81. PubMed ID: 26662261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Using stereophotogrammetric technology for obtaining intraoral digital impressions of implants.
    Pradíes G; Ferreiroa A; Özcan M; Giménez B; Martínez-Rus F
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2014 Apr; 145(4):338-44. PubMed ID: 24686966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Photogrammetric and Intraoral Digital Impression Technique for the Rehabilitation of Multiple Unfavorably Positioned Dental Implants: A Clinical Report.
    Molinero-Mourelle P; Lam W; Cascos-Sánchez R; Azevedo L; Gómez-Polo M
    J Oral Implantol; 2019 Oct; 45(5):398-402. PubMed ID: 31429638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of conventional, photogrammetry, and intraoral scanning accuracy of complete-arch implant impression procedures evaluated with a coordinate measuring machine.
    Revilla-León M; Att W; Özcan M; Rubenstein J
    J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Mar; 125(3):470-478. PubMed ID: 32386912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Photogrammetry Impression Technique: A Case History Report.
    Sánchez-Monescillo A; Sánchez-Turrión A; Vellon-Domarco E; Salinas-Goodier C; Prados-Frutos JC
    Int J Prosthodont; 2016; 29(1):71-3. PubMed ID: 26757333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effect of simulated intraoral variables on the accuracy of a photogrammetric imaging technique for complete-arch implant prostheses.
    Bratos M; Bergin JM; Rubenstein JE; Sorensen JA
    J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Aug; 120(2):232-241. PubMed ID: 29559220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Photogrammetry and conventional impressions for recording implant positions: a comparative laboratory study.
    Ortorp A; Jemt T; Bäck T
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2005; 7(1):43-50. PubMed ID: 15903174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Different implant impression techniques for edentulous patients treated with CAD/CAM complete-arch prostheses: a randomised controlled trial reporting data at 3 year post-loading.
    Pozzi A; Tallarico M; Mangani F; Barlattani A
    Eur J Oral Implantol; 2013; 6(4):325-40. PubMed ID: 24570979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Stereophotogrammetry for Recording the Position of Multiple Implants: Technical Description.
    Agustín-Panadero R; Peñarrocha-Oltra D; Gomar-Vercher S; Peñarrocha-Diago M
    Int J Prosthodont; 2015; 28(6):631-6. PubMed ID: 26523726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Photogrammetric method to measure the discrepancy between clinical and software-designed positions of implants.
    Rivara F; Lumetti S; Calciolari E; Toffoli A; Forlani G; Manfredi E
    J Prosthet Dent; 2016 Jun; 115(6):703-11. PubMed ID: 26794693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. All-on-four rehabilitation using photogrammetric impression technique.
    Sánchez-Monescillo A; Hernanz-Martín J; González-Serrano C; González-Serrano J; Duarte S
    Quintessence Int; 2019; 50(4):288-293. PubMed ID: 30887962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. An in vitro comparison of the accuracy of implant impressions with coded healing abutments and different implant angulations.
    Al-Abdullah K; Zandparsa R; Finkelman M; Hirayama H
    J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Aug; 110(2):90-100. PubMed ID: 23929370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. In vitro fit of CAD-CAM complete arch screw-retained titanium and zirconia implant prostheses fabricated on 4 implants.
    Al-Meraikhi H; Yilmaz B; McGlumphy E; Brantley W; Johnston WM
    J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Mar; 119(3):409-416. PubMed ID: 28720339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Do repeated changes of abutments have any influence on the stability of peri-implant tissues? Four-month post-loading preliminary results from a multicentre randomised controlled trial.
    Luongo G; Bressan E; Grusovin MG; d'Avenia F; Neumann K; Sbricoli L; Esposito M
    Eur J Oral Implantol; 2015; 8(2):129-40. PubMed ID: 26021224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Immediate positioning of definitive abutments versus repeated abutment replacements in immediately loaded implants: effects on bone healing at the 1-year follow-up of a multicentre randomised controlled trial.
    Grandi T; Guazzi P; Samarani R; Garuti G
    Eur J Oral Implantol; 2012; 5(1):9-16. PubMed ID: 22518376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Stereophotogrammetric impression making for polyoxymethylene, milled immediate partial fixed dental prostheses.
    Gómez-Polo M; Gómez-Polo C; Del Río J; Ortega R
    J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Apr; 119(4):506-510. PubMed ID: 28709673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. An in vitro comparison of photogrammetric and conventional complete-arch implant impression techniques.
    Bergin JM; Rubenstein JE; Mancl L; Brudvik JS; Raigrodski AJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Oct; 110(4):243-51. PubMed ID: 24079558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Marginal fit and photoelastic stress analysis of CAD-CAM and overcast 3-unit implant-supported frameworks.
    Presotto AG; Bhering CL; Mesquita MF; Barão VA
    J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Mar; 117(3):373-379. PubMed ID: 27666497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A clinical protocol for intraoral digital impression of screw-retained CAD/CAM framework on multiple implants based on wavefront sampling technology.
    Moreno A; Giménez B; Özcan M; Pradíes G
    Implant Dent; 2013 Aug; 22(4):320-5. PubMed ID: 23817542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.