BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

170 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24611565)

  • 21. Quantitative, high-resolution proteomics for data-driven systems biology.
    Cox J; Mann M
    Annu Rev Biochem; 2011; 80():273-99. PubMed ID: 21548781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Critical assessment of proteome-wide label-free absolute abundance estimation strategies.
    Ahrné E; Molzahn L; Glatter T; Schmidt A
    Proteomics; 2013 Sep; 13(17):2567-78. PubMed ID: 23794183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Applications of diagonal chromatography for proteome-wide characterization of protein modifications and activity-based analyses.
    Gevaert K; Impens F; Van Damme P; Ghesquière B; Hanoulle X; Vandekerckhove J
    FEBS J; 2007 Dec; 274(24):6277-89. PubMed ID: 18021238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Tissue proteomics of the low-molecular weight proteome using an integrated cLC-ESI-QTOFMS approach.
    Alvarez MT; Shah DJ; Thulin CD; Graves SW
    Proteomics; 2013 May; 13(9):1400-11. PubMed ID: 23456981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. An exclusion list based label-free proteome quantification approach using an LTQ Orbitrap.
    Muntel J; Hecker M; Becher D
    Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom; 2012 Mar; 26(6):701-9. PubMed ID: 22328225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Improved accuracy for label-free absolute quantification of proteome by combining the Absolute Protein EXpression profiling algorithm and summed tandem mass spectrometric total ion current.
    Wu Q; Shan Y; Qu Y; Jiang H; Yuan H; Liu J; Zhang S; Liang Z; Zhang L; Zhang Y
    Analyst; 2014 Jan; 139(1):138-46. PubMed ID: 24195105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Semi-supervised LC/MS alignment for differential proteomics.
    Fischer B; Grossmann J; Roth V; Gruissem W; Baginsky S; Buhmann JM
    Bioinformatics; 2006 Jul; 22(14):e132-40. PubMed ID: 16873463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Quantitative analysis of mTRAQ-labeled proteome using full MS scans.
    Kang UB; Yeom J; Kim H; Lee C
    J Proteome Res; 2010 Jul; 9(7):3750-8. PubMed ID: 20465265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The OMSSAPercolator: an automated tool to validate OMSSA results.
    Wen B; Li G; Wright JC; Du C; Feng Q; Xu X; Choudhary JS; Wang J
    Proteomics; 2014 May; 14(9):1011-4. PubMed ID: 24504981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. KYSS: mass spectrometry data quality assessment for protein analysis and large-scale proteomics.
    Such-Sanmartín G; Sidoli S; Ventura-Espejo E; Jensen ON
    Biochem Biophys Res Commun; 2014 Mar; 445(4):702-7. PubMed ID: 24480439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Isoform analysis of LC-MS/MS data from multidimensional fractionation of the serum proteome.
    Krasnoselsky AL; Faca VM; Pitteri SJ; Zhang Q; Hanash SM
    J Proteome Res; 2008 Jun; 7(6):2546-52. PubMed ID: 18419151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Label-free quantitative shotgun proteomics using normalized spectral abundance factors.
    Neilson KA; Keighley T; Pascovici D; Cooke B; Haynes PA
    Methods Mol Biol; 2013; 1002():205-22. PubMed ID: 23625406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Label-Free Quantitative Proteomics in Yeast.
    Léger T; Garcia C; Videlier M; Camadro JM
    Methods Mol Biol; 2016; 1361():289-307. PubMed ID: 26483028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Filtering strategies for improving protein identification in high-throughput MS/MS studies.
    Salmi J; Nyman TA; Nevalainen OS; Aittokallio T
    Proteomics; 2009 Feb; 9(4):848-60. PubMed ID: 19160393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Ranking Fragment Ions Based on Outlier Detection for Improved Label-Free Quantification in Data-Independent Acquisition LC-MS/MS.
    Bilbao A; Zhang Y; Varesio E; Luban J; Strambio-De-Castillia C; Lisacek F; Hopfgartner G
    J Proteome Res; 2015 Nov; 14(11):4581-93. PubMed ID: 26412574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Refinements of LC-MS/MS Spectral Counting Statistics Improve Quantification of Low Abundance Proteins.
    Lee HY; Kim EG; Jung HR; Jung JW; Kim HB; Cho JW; Kim KM; Yi EC
    Sci Rep; 2019 Sep; 9(1):13653. PubMed ID: 31541118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Tools for label-free peptide quantification.
    Nahnsen S; Bielow C; Reinert K; Kohlbacher O
    Mol Cell Proteomics; 2013 Mar; 12(3):549-56. PubMed ID: 23250051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. iTRAQ-based quantitative analysis of protein mixtures with large fold change and dynamic range.
    Casado-Vela J; Martínez-Esteso MJ; Rodriguez E; Borrás E; Elortza F; Bru-Martínez R
    Proteomics; 2010 Jan; 10(2):343-7. PubMed ID: 20029838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Chi-square comparison of tryptic peptide-to-protein distributions of tandem mass spectrometry from blood with those of random expectation.
    Zhu P; Bowden P; Tucholska M; Marshall JG
    Anal Biochem; 2011 Feb; 409(2):189-94. PubMed ID: 20977879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Quantitative peptide and protein profiling by mass spectrometry.
    Schmidt A; Bisle B; Kislinger T
    Methods Mol Biol; 2009; 492():21-38. PubMed ID: 19241025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.