339 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24611604)
1. Can MR imaging be used to predict tumor grade in soft-tissue sarcoma?
Zhao F; Ahlawat S; Farahani SJ; Weber KL; Montgomery EA; Carrino JA; Fayad LM
Radiology; 2014 Jul; 272(1):192-201. PubMed ID: 24611604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Detection of soft-tissue sarcoma recurrence: added value of functional MR imaging techniques at 3.0 T.
Del Grande F; Subhawong T; Weber K; Aro M; Mugera C; Fayad LM
Radiology; 2014 May; 271(2):499-511. PubMed ID: 24495264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Correlation of MRI features to histopathologic grade of soft tissue sarcoma].
Liu QY; Li HG; Chen JY; Liang BL
Ai Zheng; 2008 Aug; 27(8):856-60. PubMed ID: 18710621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Soft-Tissue Sarcomas: Assessment of MRI Features Correlating with Histologic Grade and Patient Outcome.
Crombé A; Marcellin PJ; Buy X; Stoeckle E; Brouste V; Italiano A; Le Loarer F; Kind M
Radiology; 2019 Jun; 291(3):710-721. PubMed ID: 30964422
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Rectal cancer: MR imaging in local staging--is gadolinium-based contrast material helpful?
Vliegen RF; Beets GL; von Meyenfeldt MF; Kessels AG; Lemaire EE; van Engelshoven JM; Beets-Tan RG
Radiology; 2005 Jan; 234(1):179-88. PubMed ID: 15550372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Data-driven grading of brain gliomas: a multiparametric MR imaging study.
Caulo M; Panara V; Tortora D; Mattei PA; Briganti C; Pravatà E; Salice S; Cotroneo AR; Tartaro A
Radiology; 2014 Aug; 272(2):494-503. PubMed ID: 24661247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Osseous invasion by soft-tissue sarcoma: assessment with MR imaging.
Elias DA; White LM; Simpson DJ; Kandel RA; Tomlinson G; Bell RS; Wunder JS
Radiology; 2003 Oct; 229(1):145-52. PubMed ID: 14519874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Phyllodes tumor of the breast: correlation between MR findings and histologic grade.
Yabuuchi H; Soeda H; Matsuo Y; Okafuji T; Eguchi T; Sakai S; Kuroki S; Tokunaga E; Ohno S; Nishiyama K; Hatakenaka M; Honda H
Radiology; 2006 Dec; 241(3):702-9. PubMed ID: 17032912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Background parenchymal signal enhancement ratio at preoperative MR imaging: association with subsequent local recurrence in patients with ductal carcinoma in situ after breast conservation surgery.
Kim SA; Cho N; Ryu EB; Seo M; Bae MS; Chang JM; Moon WK
Radiology; 2014 Mar; 270(3):699-707. PubMed ID: 24126372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Urinary bladder cancer: diffusion-weighted MR imaging--accuracy for diagnosing T stage and estimating histologic grade.
Takeuchi M; Sasaki S; Ito M; Okada S; Takahashi S; Kawai T; Suzuki K; Oshima H; Hara M; Shibamoto Y
Radiology; 2009 Apr; 251(1):112-21. PubMed ID: 19332849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. MR imaging features of small solid pseudopapillary tumors: retrospective differentiation from other small solid pancreatic tumors.
Yu MH; Lee JY; Kim MA; Kim SH; Lee JM; Han JK; Choi BI
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2010 Dec; 195(6):1324-32. PubMed ID: 21098190
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Multiparametric Assessment of Treatment Response in High-Grade Soft-Tissue Sarcomas with Anatomic and Functional MR Imaging Sequences.
Soldatos T; Ahlawat S; Montgomery E; Chalian M; Jacobs MA; Fayad LM
Radiology; 2016 Mar; 278(3):831-40. PubMed ID: 26390048
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Reducing metallic artifacts in postoperative spinal imaging: usefulness of IDEAL contrast-enhanced T1- and T2-weighted MR imaging--phantom and clinical studies.
Cha JG; Jin W; Lee MH; Kim DH; Park JS; Shin WH; Yi BH
Radiology; 2011 Jun; 259(3):885-93. PubMed ID: 21386053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. T1 hyperintense renal lesions: characterization with diffusion-weighted MR imaging versus contrast-enhanced MR imaging.
Kim S; Jain M; Harris AB; Lee VS; Babb JS; Sigmund EE; Rueff LE; Taouli B
Radiology; 2009 Jun; 251(3):796-807. PubMed ID: 19380690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Prostate cancer: relationships between postbiopsy hemorrhage and tumor detectability at MR diagnosis.
Tamada T; Sone T; Jo Y; Yamamoto A; Yamashita T; Egashira N; Imai S; Fukunaga M
Radiology; 2008 Aug; 248(2):531-9. PubMed ID: 18539890
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The lactating breast: contrast-enhanced MR imaging of normal tissue and cancer.
Espinosa LA; Daniel BL; Vidarsson L; Zakhour M; Ikeda DM; Herfkens RJ
Radiology; 2005 Nov; 237(2):429-36. PubMed ID: 16244250
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Small (≤1-cm) hepatocellular carcinoma: diagnostic performance and imaging features at gadoxetic acid-enhanced MR imaging.
Yu MH; Kim JH; Yoon JH; Kim HC; Chung JW; Han JK; Choi BI
Radiology; 2014 Jun; 271(3):748-60. PubMed ID: 24588677
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity: MR findings and value of T1-versus T2-weighted fast spin-echo images.
Yasumoto M; Shibuya H; Takeda M; Korenaga T
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 Apr; 164(4):981-7. PubMed ID: 7726062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Relationship between contrast enhancement on fluid-attenuated inversion recovery MR sequences and signal intensity on T2-weighted MR images: visual evaluation of brain tumors.
Kubota T; Yamada K; Kizu O; Hirota T; Ito H; Ishihara K; Nishimura T
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2005 Jun; 21(6):694-700. PubMed ID: 15906343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Fibrosis and postoperative fistula of the pancreas: correlation with MR imaging findings--preliminary results.
Watanabe H; Kanematsu M; Tanaka K; Osada S; Tomita H; Hara A; Goshima S; Kondo H; Kawada H; Noda Y; Tanahashi Y; Kawai N; Yoshida K; Moriyama N
Radiology; 2014 Mar; 270(3):791-9. PubMed ID: 24475834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
