These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

222 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24611727)

  • 1. Application of three-dimensional computed tomography in craniofacial clinical practice and research.
    Anderson PJ; Yong R; Surman TL; Rajion ZA; Ranjitkar S
    Aust Dent J; 2014 Jun; 59 Suppl 1():174-85. PubMed ID: 24611727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Using cone-beam CT as a low-dose 3D imaging technique for the extremities: initial experience in 50 subjects.
    Huang AJ; Chang CY; Thomas BJ; MacMahon PJ; Palmer WE
    Skeletal Radiol; 2015 Jun; 44(6):797-809. PubMed ID: 25652734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. 3D cone-beam CT with a twin robotic x-ray system in elbow imaging: comparison of image quality to high-resolution multidetector CT.
    Grunz JP; Weng AM; Kunz AS; Veyhl-Wichmann M; Schmitt R; Gietzen CH; Pennig L; Herz S; Ergün S; Bley TA; Gassenmaier T
    Eur Radiol Exp; 2020 Sep; 4(1):52. PubMed ID: 32895778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cone-Beam Computed Tomography: a useful tool for dental age estimation?
    Maret D; Peters OA; Dedouit F; Telmon N; Sixou M
    Med Hypotheses; 2011 May; 76(5):700-2. PubMed ID: 21345598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Bone quality evaluation at dental implant site using multislice CT, micro-CT, and cone beam CT.
    Parsa A; Ibrahim N; Hassan B; van der Stelt P; Wismeijer D
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2015; 26(1):e1-7. PubMed ID: 24325572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cone beam CT paranasal sinuses versus standard multidetector and low dose multidetector CT studies.
    Al Abduwani J; ZilinSkiene L; Colley S; Ahmed S
    Am J Otolaryngol; 2016; 37(1):59-64. PubMed ID: 26700263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Three-dimensional spiral CT of craniofacial malformations in children.
    Binaghi S; Gudinchet F; Rilliet B
    Pediatr Radiol; 2000 Dec; 30(12):856-60. PubMed ID: 11149095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Flat panel detector-based cone beam computed tomography with a circle-plus-two-arcs data acquisition orbit: preliminary phantom study.
    Ning R; Tang X; Conover D; Yu R
    Med Phys; 2003 Jul; 30(7):1694-705. PubMed ID: 12906186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Self-assembled micro-computed tomography for dental education.
    Liao CW; Fuh LJ; Shen YW; Huang HL; Kuo CW; Tsai MT; Hsu JT
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(12):e0209698. PubMed ID: 30586444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. State-of-the-art on cone beam CT imaging for preoperative planning of implant placement.
    Guerrero ME; Jacobs R; Loubele M; Schutyser F; Suetens P; van Steenberghe D
    Clin Oral Investig; 2006 Mar; 10(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 16482455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Intraoperative cone-beam computed tomography and multi-slice computed tomography in temporal bone imaging for surgical treatment.
    Erovic BM; Chan HH; Daly MJ; Pothier DD; Yu E; Coulson C; Lai P; Irish JC
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2014 Jan; 150(1):107-14. PubMed ID: 24170658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Cone beam CT for dental and maxillofacial imaging: dose matters.
    Pauwels R
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2015 Jul; 165(1-4):156-61. PubMed ID: 25805884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The reliability of computed tomography (CT) values and dimensional measurements of the oropharyngeal region using cone beam CT: comparison with multidetector CT.
    Yamashina A; Tanimoto K; Sutthiprapaporn P; Hayakawa Y
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2008 Jul; 37(5):245-51. PubMed ID: 18606745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of the accuracy of 3-dimensional cone-beam computed tomography and micro-computed tomography reconstructions by using different voxel sizes.
    Maret D; Peters OA; Galibourg A; Dumoncel J; Esclassan R; Kahn JL; Sixou M; Telmon N
    J Endod; 2014 Sep; 40(9):1321-6. PubMed ID: 25146011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Accuracy of 3D reconstructions based on cone beam computed tomography.
    Maret D; Molinier F; Braga J; Peters OA; Telmon N; Treil J; Inglèse JM; Cossié A; Kahn JL; Sixou M
    J Dent Res; 2010 Dec; 89(12):1465-9. PubMed ID: 20929716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cone beam computed tomography radiation dose and image quality assessments.
    Lofthag-Hansen S
    Swed Dent J Suppl; 2010; (209):4-55. PubMed ID: 21229915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Accuracy assessment of three-dimensional surface reconstructions of teeth from cone beam computed tomography scans.
    Al-Rawi B; Hassan B; Vandenberge B; Jacobs R
    J Oral Rehabil; 2010 May; 37(5):352-8. PubMed ID: 20180895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Metallic artifacts from internal scaphoid fracture fixation screws: comparison between C-arm flat-panel, cone-beam, and multidetector computed tomography.
    Finkenstaedt T; Morsbach F; Calcagni M; Vich M; Pfirrmann CW; Alkadhi H; Runge VM; Andreisek G; Guggenberger R
    Invest Radiol; 2014 Aug; 49(8):532-9. PubMed ID: 24691141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The use of cone-beam computed tomography in an orthodontic department in between research and daily clinic.
    Cattaneo PM; Melsen B
    World J Orthod; 2008; 9(3):269-82. PubMed ID: 18834009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of the Radiation Dose from Cone Beam Computed Tomography and Multidetector Computed Tomography in Examinations of the Hand.
    Neubauer J; Neubauer C; Gerstmair A; Krauss T; Reising K; Zajonc H; Kotter E; Langer M; Fiebich M; Voigt J
    Rofo; 2016 May; 188(5):488-93. PubMed ID: 26981913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.