These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

188 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24611948)

  • 1. Probing the sensory effects of involuntary attention change by ERPs to auditory transients.
    Horváth J
    Psychophysiology; 2014 May; 51(5):489-97. PubMed ID: 24611948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Distraction in a continuous-stimulation detection task.
    Horváth J; Winkler I
    Biol Psychol; 2010 Mar; 83(3):229-38. PubMed ID: 20064580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Attention-dependent sound offset-related brain potentials.
    Horváth J
    Psychophysiology; 2016 May; 53(5):663-77. PubMed ID: 26757414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Exploiting temporal predictability: Event-related potential correlates of task-supportive temporal cue processing in auditory distraction.
    Volosin M; Grimm S; Horváth J
    Brain Res; 2016 May; 1639():120-31. PubMed ID: 26947619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effects of acoustic gradient noise from functional magnetic resonance imaging on auditory processing as reflected by event-related brain potentials.
    Novitski N; Alho K; Korzyukov O; Carlson S; Martinkauppi S; Escera C; Rinne T; Aronen HJ; Näätänen R
    Neuroimage; 2001 Jul; 14(1 Pt 1):244-51. PubMed ID: 11525334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Sensory ERP effects in auditory distraction: did we miss the main event?
    Horváth J
    Psychol Res; 2014; 78(3):339-48. PubMed ID: 23913121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Task difficulty modulates voluntary attention allocation, but not distraction in an auditory distraction paradigm.
    Volosin M; Horváth J
    Brain Res; 2020 Jan; 1727():146565. PubMed ID: 31765629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Task-optimal auditory attention set restored as fast in older as in younger adults after distraction.
    Volosin M; Gaál ZA; Horváth J
    Biol Psychol; 2017 May; 126():71-81. PubMed ID: 28411034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Perceptual and cognitive task difficulty has differential effects on auditory distraction.
    Muller-Gass A; Schröger E
    Brain Res; 2007 Mar; 1136(1):169-77. PubMed ID: 17223092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Auditory N1 component to gaps in continuous narrowband noises.
    Atcherson SR; Gould HJ; Mendel MI; Ethington CA
    Ear Hear; 2009 Dec; 30(6):687-95. PubMed ID: 19675460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The development of involuntary and voluntary attention from childhood to adulthood: a combined behavioral and event-related potential study.
    Wetzel N; Widmann A; Berti S; Schröger E
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2006 Oct; 117(10):2191-203. PubMed ID: 16926109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Memory-based pre-attentive auditory N1 elicited by sound movement.
    Ohoyama K; Motomura E; Inui K; Nishihara M; Otsuru N; Oi M; Kakigi R; Okada M
    Neurosci Res; 2012 Jul; 73(3):248-51. PubMed ID: 22525281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Preattentive cortical-evoked responses to pure tones, harmonic tones, and speech: influence of music training.
    Nikjeh DA; Lister JJ; Frisch SA
    Ear Hear; 2009 Aug; 30(4):432-46. PubMed ID: 19494778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Involuntary sensory enhancement of gain- and loss-associated tones: A general relevance principle.
    Folyi T; Wentura D
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2019 Apr; 138():11-26. PubMed ID: 30685230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Attenuation of auditory ERPs to action-sound coincidences is not explained by voluntary allocation of attention.
    Horváth J
    Psychophysiology; 2013 Mar; 50(3):266-73. PubMed ID: 23316925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Stimulus-focused attention speeds up auditory processing.
    Folyi T; Fehér B; Horváth J
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2012 May; 84(2):155-63. PubMed ID: 22326595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Involuntary attentional capture by speech and non-speech deviations: a combined behavioral-event-related potential study.
    Reiche M; Hartwigsen G; Widmann A; Saur D; Schröger E; Bendixen A
    Brain Res; 2013 Jan; 1490():153-60. PubMed ID: 23123705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evidence for the auditory P3a reflecting an automatic process: elicitation during highly-focused continuous visual attention.
    Muller-Gass A; Macdonald M; Schröger E; Sculthorpe L; Campbell K
    Brain Res; 2007 Sep; 1170():71-8. PubMed ID: 17692834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Which kind of transition is important for sound representation? An event-related potential study.
    Weise A; Bendixen A; Müller D; Schröger E
    Brain Res; 2012 Jun; 1464():30-42. PubMed ID: 22613810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Specific or general? The nature of attention set changes triggered by distracting auditory events.
    Horváth J; Roeber U; Bendixen A; Schröger E
    Brain Res; 2008 Sep; 1229():193-203. PubMed ID: 18634759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.