BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

412 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24612172)

  • 21. Midterm prospective comparison of vaginal repair with mesh vs Prolift system devices for prolapse.
    Chen YS; Cao Q; Ding JX; Hu CD; Feng WW; Hua KQ
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2012 Oct; 164(2):221-6. PubMed ID: 22771224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Quality of life in women of non-reproductive age with transvaginal mesh repair for pelvic organ prolapse: A cohort study.
    Hüsch T; Mager R; Ober E; Bentler R; Ulm K; Haferkamp A
    Int J Surg; 2016 Sep; 33 Pt A():36-41. PubMed ID: 27465100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Recurrence of prolapse after transvaginal mesh excision.
    George A; Mattingly M; Woodman P; Hale D
    Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2013; 19(4):202-5. PubMed ID: 23797517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Comparison of complications and prolapse recurrence between laparoscopic and vaginal uterosacral ligament suspension for the treatment of vaginal prolapse.
    Turner LC; Lavelle ES; Shepherd JP
    Int Urogynecol J; 2016 May; 27(5):797-803. PubMed ID: 26658893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Complex rectovaginal fistulas after pelvic organ prolapse repair with synthetic mesh: a multidisciplinary approach to evaluation and management.
    Choi JM; Nguyen V; Khavari R; Reeves K; Snyder M; Fletcher SG
    Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2012; 18(6):366-71. PubMed ID: 23143433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Postoperative voiding difficulty and mesh-related complications after Total Prolift System surgical repair for pelvic organ prolapse and predisposing factors.
    Zhang L; Zhu L; Xu T; Liang S; Lang J
    Menopause; 2015 Aug; 22(8):885-92. PubMed ID: 25608274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Women's quality of life and sexual function after transvaginal anterior repair with mesh insertion.
    El Haddad R; Svabik K; Masata J; Koleska T; Hubka P; Martan A
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2013 Mar; 167(1):110-3. PubMed ID: 23265298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Risk factors of surgical failure following transvaginal mesh repair for the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse.
    Long CY; Lo TS; Wang CL; Wu CH; Liu CM; Su JH
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2012 Apr; 161(2):224-7. PubMed ID: 22326614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Anatomic outcomes of vaginal mesh procedure (Prolift) compared with uterosacral ligament suspension and abdominal sacrocolpopexy for pelvic organ prolapse: a Fellows' Pelvic Research Network study.
    Sanses TV; Shahryarinejad A; Molden S; Hoskey KA; Abbasy S; Patterson D; Saks EK; Weber LeBrun EE; Gamble TL; King VG; Nguyen AL; Abed H; Young SB;
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Nov; 201(5):519.e1-8. PubMed ID: 19716533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Complications of Pelvic Organ Prolapse Surgery in the 2015 Finnish Pelvic Organ Prolapse Surgery Survey Study.
    Wihersaari O; Karjalainen P; Tolppanen AM; Mattsson N; Jalkanen J; Nieminen K
    Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Dec; 136(6):1135-1144. PubMed ID: 33156186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Transvaginal high uterosacral ligament suspension: An alternative to McCall culdoplasty in the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse.
    Novara L; Sgro LG; Pecchio S; Ottino L; Tomatis V; Biglia N
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2019 Sep; 240():278-281. PubMed ID: 31351324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Rate of re-interventions after transvaginal pelvic organ prolapse repair using partially absorbable mesh: 20 months median follow-up outcomes.
    Quemener J; Joutel N; Lucot JP; Giraudet G; Collinet P; Rubod C; Cosson M
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2014 Apr; 175():194-8. PubMed ID: 24461139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Evaluating the efficacy of the single-incision uphold system for pelvic organ prolapse repair.
    Chang YW; Chuang FC; Wu LY; Yang TH; Kung FT; Huang KH
    Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Jan; 58(1):94-98. PubMed ID: 30638489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Short-range clinical, dynamic magnetic resonance imaging and P-QOL questionnaire results after mesh repair in female pelvic organ prolapse.
    Brocker KA; Alt CD; Corteville C; Hallscheidt P; Lenz F; Sohn C
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2011 Jul; 157(1):107-12. PubMed ID: 21459506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Transvaginal surgery using self-cut mesh for pelvic organ prolapse: 3-year clinical outcomes.
    Gonocruz SG; Hayashi T; Tokiwa S; Sawada Y; Okada Y; Yoshio Y; Krisna R; Kitagawa Y; Shimizu Y; Nomura M
    Int J Urol; 2019 Jul; 26(7):731-736. PubMed ID: 31066098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Prospective study of transobturator mesh kit (Prolift™) in pelvic reconstructive surgery with vaginal hysterectomy after 3 years' follow-up.
    Wang FM; He CN; Song YF
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2013 Aug; 288(2):355-9. PubMed ID: 23435722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Laparoscopic repair of vaginal vault prolapse by lateral suspension with mesh.
    Dubuisson J; Eperon I; Dällenbach P; Dubuisson JB
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2013 Feb; 287(2):307-12. PubMed ID: 23001368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Pelvic organ prolapse (POP) surgery: the evidence for the repairs.
    Gomelsky A; Penson DF; Dmochowski RR
    BJU Int; 2011 Jun; 107(11):1704-19. PubMed ID: 21592280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Surgical outcomes and quality of life post-synthetic mesh-augmented repair for pelvic organ prolapse in the Chinese population.
    Sun X; Zhang X; Wang J
    J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2014 Feb; 40(2):509-14. PubMed ID: 24118430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Age-stratified analysis of long-term outcomes of transvaginal mesh repair for treatment of pelvic organ prolapse.
    Dong S; Zhong Y; Chu L; Li H; Tong X; Wang J
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2016 Oct; 135(1):112-6. PubMed ID: 27392806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 21.