These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

328 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24612804)

  • 1. Short communication: Use of young bulls in the United States.
    Hutchison JL; Cole JB; Bickhart DM
    J Dairy Sci; 2014 May; 97(5):3213-20. PubMed ID: 24612804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Timeliness and effectiveness of progeny testing through artificial insemination.
    Norman HD; Powell RL; Wright JR; Sattler CG
    J Dairy Sci; 2003 Apr; 86(4):1513-25. PubMed ID: 12741578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Choice of artificial insemination beef bulls used to mate with female dairy cattle.
    Berry DP; Ring SC; Twomey AJ; Evans RD
    J Dairy Sci; 2020 Feb; 103(2):1701-1710. PubMed ID: 31785871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Changes of evaluation for natural-service sampled bulls brought into artificial insemination.
    Norman HD; Powell RL; Wright JR
    J Dairy Sci; 1985 Jun; 68(6):1513-22. PubMed ID: 4019889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluations for service-sire conception rate for heifer and cow inseminations with conventional and sexed semen.
    Norman HD; Hutchison JL; VanRaden PM
    J Dairy Sci; 2011 Dec; 94(12):6135-42. PubMed ID: 22118101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The impact of 3 strategies for incorporating polled genetics into a dairy cattle breeding program on the overall herd genetic merit.
    Spurlock DM; Stock ML; Coetzee JF
    J Dairy Sci; 2014; 97(8):5265-74. PubMed ID: 24913645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Short communication: Field fertility in Holstein bulls: Can type of breeding strategy (artificial insemination following estrus versus timed artificial insemination) alter service sire fertility?
    Batista EOS; Vieira LM; Sá Filho MF; Carvalho PD; Rivera H; Cabrera V; Wiltbank MC; Baruselli PS; Souza AH
    J Dairy Sci; 2016 Mar; 99(3):2010-2015. PubMed ID: 26778314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Overview of progeny-test programs of artificial-insemination organizations in the United States.
    Norman HD; Powell RL; Wright JR; Sattler CG
    J Dairy Sci; 2001 Aug; 84(8):1899-912. PubMed ID: 11518316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Use of sexed semen and its effect on conception rate, calf sex, dystocia, and stillbirth of Holsteins in the United States.
    Norman HD; Hutchison JL; Miller RH
    J Dairy Sci; 2010 Aug; 93(8):3880-90. PubMed ID: 20655457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Major advances in globalization and consolidation of the artificial insemination industry.
    Funk DA
    J Dairy Sci; 2006 Apr; 89(4):1362-8. PubMed ID: 16537967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Genomic prediction of residual feed intake in US Holstein dairy cattle.
    Li B; VanRaden PM; Guduk E; O'Connell JR; Null DJ; Connor EE; VandeHaar MJ; Tempelman RJ; Weigel KA; Cole JB
    J Dairy Sci; 2020 Mar; 103(3):2477-2486. PubMed ID: 31954583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Are evaluations on young genotyped animals benefiting from the past generations?
    Lourenco DA; Misztal I; Tsuruta S; Aguilar I; Lawlor TJ; Forni S; Weller JI
    J Dairy Sci; 2014; 97(6):3930-42. PubMed ID: 24679931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Mating programs including genomic relationships and dominance effects.
    Sun C; VanRaden PM; O'Connell JR; Weigel KA; Gianola D
    J Dairy Sci; 2013; 96(12):8014-23. PubMed ID: 24119810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluating sire selection practices using lifetime net income functions.
    Cassell BG; Jobst SM; McGilliard ML; Pearson RE
    J Dairy Sci; 2002 Dec; 85(12):3492-502. PubMed ID: 12512623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Investigating conception rate for beef service sires bred to dairy cows and heifers.
    McWhorter TM; Hutchison JL; Norman HD; Cole JB; Fok GC; Lourenco DAL; VanRaden PM
    J Dairy Sci; 2020 Nov; 103(11):10374-10382. PubMed ID: 32896403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effects of genomic selection on genetic improvement, inbreeding, and merit of young versus proven bulls.
    de Roos AP; Schrooten C; Veerkamp RF; van Arendonk JA
    J Dairy Sci; 2011 Mar; 94(3):1559-67. PubMed ID: 21338821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Reproductive status of Holstein and Jersey cows in the United States.
    Norman HD; Wright JR; Hubbard SM; Miller RH; Hutchison JL
    J Dairy Sci; 2009 Jul; 92(7):3517-28. PubMed ID: 19528630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effect of genomic selection on rate of inbreeding and coancestry and effective population size of Holstein and Jersey cattle populations.
    Makanjuola BO; Miglior F; Abdalla EA; Maltecca C; Schenkel FS; Baes CF
    J Dairy Sci; 2020 Jun; 103(6):5183-5199. PubMed ID: 32278553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Short communication: Two dominant paternal lineages for North American Jersey artificial insemination sires.
    Dechow CD; Liu WS; Idun JS; Maness B
    J Dairy Sci; 2018 Mar; 101(3):2281-2284. PubMed ID: 29290440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The genomic evaluation system in the United States: past, present, future.
    Wiggans GR; Vanraden PM; Cooper TA
    J Dairy Sci; 2011 Jun; 94(6):3202-11. PubMed ID: 21605789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.