165 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24613088)
1. Otoacoustic emissions in newborn hearing screening: a systematic review of the effects of different protocols on test outcomes.
Akinpelu OV; Peleva E; Funnell WR; Daniel SJ
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2014 May; 78(5):711-7. PubMed ID: 24613088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Early detection of neonatal hearing loss by otoacoustic emissions and auditory brainstem response over 10 years of experience.
Escobar-Ipuz FA; Soria-Bretones C; García-Jiménez MA; Cueto EM; Torres Aranda AM; Sotos JM
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2019 Dec; 127():109647. PubMed ID: 31470205
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Assessment of the feasibility and coverage of a modified universal hearing screening protocol for use with newborn babies of migrant workers in Beijing.
Qi B; Cheng X; En H; Liu B; Peng S; Zhen Y; Cai Z; Huang L; Zhang L; Han D
BMC Pediatr; 2013 Aug; 13():116. PubMed ID: 23926962
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A multicenter evaluation of how many infants with permanent hearing loss pass a two-stage otoacoustic emissions/automated auditory brainstem response newborn hearing screening protocol.
Johnson JL; White KR; Widen JE; Gravel JS; James M; Kennalley T; Maxon AB; Spivak L; Sullivan-Mahoney M; Vohr BR; Weirather Y; Holstrum J
Pediatrics; 2005 Sep; 116(3):663-72. PubMed ID: 16140706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Otoacoustic Emissions in Rural Nicaragua: Cost Analysis and Implications for Newborn Hearing Screening.
Wong LY; Espinoza F; Alvarez KM; Molter D; Saunders JE
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2017 May; 156(5):877-885. PubMed ID: 28457225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Prevalence and referral rates in neonatal hearing screening program using two step hearing screening protocol in Chennai - A prospective study.
Vignesh SS; Jaya V; Sasireka BI; Sarathy K; Vanthana M
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2015 Oct; 79(10):1745-7. PubMed ID: 26296879
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effect of analgesia with pethidine during labour on false positivity of newborn hearing screening test.
Kadirogullari P; Yalcin Bahat P; Karabuk E; Bagci Cakmak K; Seckin KD
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2022 Dec; 35(25):6254-6259. PubMed ID: 33882796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. An effective compromise between cost and referral rate: A sequential hearing screening protocol using TEOAEs and AABRs for healthy newborns.
Shang Y; Hao W; Gao Z; Xu C; Ru Y; Ni D
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2016 Dec; 91():141-145. PubMed ID: 27863628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Newborn hearing screening failure and maternal factors during pregnancy.
Schwarz Y; Kaufman GN; Daniel SJ
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2017 Dec; 103():65-70. PubMed ID: 29224768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Neonatal hearing screening: evaluation of tone-burst and click-evoked otoacoustic emission test criteria.
McPherson B; Li SF; Shi BX; Tang JL; Wong BY
Ear Hear; 2006 Jun; 27(3):256-62. PubMed ID: 16672794
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Newborn hearing screening and strategy for early detection of hearing loss in infants.
Jakubíková J; Kabátová Z; Pavlovcinová G; Profant M
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2009 Apr; 73(4):607-12. PubMed ID: 19185924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.
Crider K; Williams J; Qi YP; Gutman J; Yeung L; Mai C; Finkelstain J; Mehta S; Pons-Duran C; Menéndez C; Moraleda C; Rogers L; Daniels K; Green P
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2022 Feb; 2(2022):. PubMed ID: 36321557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Universal neonatal hearing screening: the Siena (Italy) experience on 19,700 newborns.
De Capua B; Costantini D; Martufi C; Latini G; Gentile M; De Felice C
Early Hum Dev; 2007 Sep; 83(9):601-6. PubMed ID: 17307313
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. High-frequency otoacoustic emissions in universal newborn hearing screening.
Akinpelu OV; Funnell WRJ; Daniel SJ
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2019 Dec; 127():109659. PubMed ID: 31493551
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Critical analysis of three newborn hearing screening protocols.
Freitas VS; Alvarenga Kde F; Bevilacqua MC; Martinez MA; Costa OA
Pro Fono; 2009; 21(3):201-6. PubMed ID: 19838565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Improving universal newborn hearing screening outcomes by conducting it with thyroid screening.
Rahimi V; Mohammadkhani G; Javadi F
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2018 Aug; 111():111-114. PubMed ID: 29958592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The results of newborn hearing screening by means of transient otoacoustic emissions - has anything changed over 10 years?
Wroblewska-Seniuk K; Greczka G; Dabrowski P; Szyfter W; Mazela J
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2017 May; 96():4-10. PubMed ID: 28390612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Newborn hearing screening: the great omission.
Mehl AL; Thomson V
Pediatrics; 1998 Jan; 101(1):E4. PubMed ID: 9417168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. reducing false positives in newborn hearing screening program: how and why.
Lin HC; Shu MT; Lee KS; Lin HY; Lin G
Otol Neurotol; 2007 Sep; 28(6):788-92. PubMed ID: 17948357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Newborn hearing screening: experience in a Malaysian hospital.
Abdullah A; Hazim MY; Almyzan A; Jamilah AG; Roslin S; Ann MT; Borhan L; Sani A; Saim L; Boo NY
Singapore Med J; 2006 Jan; 47(1):60-4. PubMed ID: 16397723
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]