These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

243 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24613552)

  • 41. 20 years of ultrasound contrast agent modeling.
    Faez T; Emmer M; Kooiman K; Versluis M; van der Steen A; de Jong N
    IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2013 Jan; 60(1):7-20. PubMed ID: 23287909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Surfactant shedding and gas diffusion during pulsed ultrasound through a microbubble contrast agent suspension.
    O'Brien JP; Stride E; Ovenden N
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Aug; 134(2):1416-27. PubMed ID: 23927137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Investigation of the relationship of nonlinear backscattered ultrasound intensity with microbubble concentration at low MI.
    Lampaskis M; Averkiou M
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2010 Feb; 36(2):306-12. PubMed ID: 20045592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. An ultrasonic microbubble semi-intermodulated imaging technique.
    Wu CY; Tsao J; Chou YH
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2005 Sep; 31(9):1199-210. PubMed ID: 16176787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Scaling of the viscoelastic shell properties of phospholipid encapsulated microbubbles with ultrasound frequency.
    Helfield BL; Leung BY; Huo X; Goertz DE
    Ultrasonics; 2014 Aug; 54(6):1419-24. PubMed ID: 24746478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Dual-high-frequency ultrasound excitation on microbubble destruction volume.
    Shen CC; Su SY; Cheng CH; Yeh CK
    Ultrasonics; 2010 Jun; 50(7):698-703. PubMed ID: 20193957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Subharmonic, non-linear fundamental and ultraharmonic imaging of microbubble contrast at high frequencies.
    Daeichin V; Bosch JG; Needles A; Foster FS; van der Steen A; de Jong N
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2015 Feb; 41(2):486-97. PubMed ID: 25592458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Optimal Control of SonoVue Microbubbles to Estimate Hydrostatic Pressure.
    Nio AQX; Faraci A; Christensen-Jeffries K; Raymond JL; Monaghan MJ; Fuster D; Forsberg F; Eckersley RJ; Lamata P
    IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2020 Mar; 67(3):557-567. PubMed ID: 31634833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Simulation of noninvasive blood pressure estimation using ultrasound contrast agent microbubbles.
    Li F; Wang L; Fan Y; Li D
    IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2012 Apr; 59(4):715-26. PubMed ID: 22547282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. WE-C-218-01: Ultrasound Contrast Agents.
    Streeter JE; Dayton PA
    Med Phys; 2012 Jun; 39(6Part27):3953. PubMed ID: 28520019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Investigation of vaporized submicron perfluorocarbon droplets as an ultrasound contrast agent.
    Reznik N; Williams R; Burns PN
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2011 Aug; 37(8):1271-9. PubMed ID: 21723449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Monodisperse Versus Polydisperse Ultrasound Contrast Agents: Non-Linear Response, Sensitivity, and Deep Tissue Imaging Potential.
    Segers T; Kruizinga P; Kok MP; Lajoinie G; de Jong N; Versluis M
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2018 Jul; 44(7):1482-1492. PubMed ID: 29705522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Nonspherical oscillations of ultrasound contrast agent microbubbles.
    Dollet B; van der Meer SM; Garbin V; de Jong N; Lohse D; Versluis M
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2008 Sep; 34(9):1465-73. PubMed ID: 18450362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Investigation of microbubble response to long pulses used in ultrasound-enhanced drug delivery.
    Mannaris C; Averkiou MA
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2012 Apr; 38(4):681-91. PubMed ID: 22341047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Focal areas of increased lipid concentration on the coating of microbubbles during short tone-burst ultrasound insonification.
    Kooiman K; van Rooij T; Qin B; Mastik F; Vos HJ; Versluis M; Klibanov AL; de Jong N; Villanueva FS; Chen X
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(7):e0180747. PubMed ID: 28686673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Pulse sequences for uniform perfluorocarbon droplet vaporization and ultrasound imaging.
    Puett C; Sheeran PS; Rojas JD; Dayton PA
    Ultrasonics; 2014 Sep; 54(7):2024-33. PubMed ID: 24965563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Impact of acoustic pressure on ambient pressure estimation using ultrasound contrast agent.
    Andersen KS; Jensen JA
    Ultrasonics; 2010 Feb; 50(2):294-9. PubMed ID: 19822339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Nonlinear shell behavior of phospholipid-coated microbubbles.
    Overvelde M; Garbin V; Sijl J; Dollet B; de Jong N; Lohse D; Versluis M
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2010 Dec; 36(12):2080-92. PubMed ID: 21030140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Advantages in using multifrequency excitation of contrast microbubbles for enhancing echo particle image velocimetry techniques: initial numerical studies using rectangular and triangular waves.
    Zheng H; Mukdadi O; Kim H; Hertzberg JR; Shandas R
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2005 Jan; 31(1):99-108. PubMed ID: 15653236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Acoustic characterization of monodisperse lipid-coated microbubbles: relationship between size and shell viscoelastic properties.
    Parrales MA; Fernandez JM; Perez-Saborid M; Kopechek JA; Porter TM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Sep; 136(3):1077. PubMed ID: 25190383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.