These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24614878)

  • 1. Retentive strength of implant-supported base metal copings over short metal abutments using different luting agents and surface treatments.
    Nejatidanesh F; Savabi O; Ebrahimi M; Savabi G
    Implant Dent; 2014 Apr; 23(2):162-7. PubMed ID: 24614878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Retention of implant-supported zirconium oxide ceramic restorations using different luting agents.
    Nejatidanesh F; Savabi O; Shahtoosi M
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2013 Aug; 24 Suppl A100():20-4. PubMed ID: 22092303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effect of surface treatment on the retention of implant-supported zirconia restorations over short abutments.
    Nejatidanesh F; Savabi O; Jabbari E
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Jul; 112(1):38-44. PubMed ID: 24388717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Retentiveness of metal coping luted to teeth of uremic patients undergoing hemodialysis using five different luting cements.
    Ghazy MH; Aboumadina MM; Mahmoud SH
    Oper Dent; 2014; 39(3):E101-8. PubMed ID: 24191870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Retention of cast crown copings cemented to implant abutments.
    Dudley JE; Richards LC; Abbott JR
    Aust Dent J; 2008 Dec; 53(4):332-9. PubMed ID: 19133949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Retentive strength of metal copings on prefabricated abutments with five different cements.
    Maeyama H; Sawase T; Jimbo R; Kamada K; Suketa N; Fukui J; Atsuta M
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2005; 7(4):229-34. PubMed ID: 16336914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Retentive properties of five different luting cements on base and noble metal copings.
    Ergin S; Gemalmaz D
    J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Nov; 88(5):491-7. PubMed ID: 12473998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Retentiveness of implant-supported metal copings using different luting agents.
    Nejatidanesh F; Savabi O; Ebrahimi M; Savabi G
    Dent Res J (Isfahan); 2012 Jan; 9(1):13-8. PubMed ID: 22363357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Influence of internal-gap width and cement type on the retentive force of zirconia copings in pullout testing.
    Son YH; Han CH; Kim S
    J Dent; 2012 Oct; 40(10):866-72. PubMed ID: 22819954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cement selection for implant-supported crowns fabricated with different luting space settings.
    Gultekin P; Gultekin BA; Aydin M; Yalcin S
    J Prosthodont; 2013 Feb; 22(2):112-9. PubMed ID: 23387964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluation of Retention Forces of Implant-Supported Zirconia Copings on Titanium Abutments Coated with Metal Opaquers Using Different Cements.
    Lei W; Guo J; Du R; Shi B
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2022; 37(2):339-345. PubMed ID: 35476863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Retentiveness of dental cements used with metallic implant components.
    Squier RS; Agar JR; Duncan JP; Taylor TD
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2001; 16(6):793-8. PubMed ID: 11769829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The effect of thermal cycling and air abrasion on cement failure loads of 4 provisional luting agents used for the cementation of implant-supported fixed partial dentures.
    Michalakis K; Pissiotis AL; Kang K; Hirayama H; Garefis PD; Petridis H
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(4):569-74. PubMed ID: 17929517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Retention of zirconia on titanium in two-piece abutments with self-adhesive resin cements.
    Mehl C; Zhang Q; Lehmann F; Kern M
    J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Aug; 120(2):214-219. PubMed ID: 29627210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effect of cleaning methods on retentive values of saliva-contaminated implant-supported zirconia copings.
    Nejatidanesh F; Savabi O; Savabi G; Razavi M
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2018 May; 29(5):530-536. PubMed ID: 29656421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Influence of abutment height and surface roughness on in vitro retention of three luting agents.
    Cano-Batalla J; Soliva-Garriga J; Campillo-Funollet M; Munoz-Viveros CA; Giner-Tarrida L
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2012; 27(1):36-41. PubMed ID: 22299076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The comparison of provisional luting agents and abutment surface roughness on the retention of provisional implant-supported crowns.
    Kim Y; Yamashita J; Shotwell JL; Chong KH; Wang HL
    J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Jun; 95(6):450-5. PubMed ID: 16765158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Retrievability of implant-retained crowns following cementation.
    Mehl C; Harder S; Wolfart M; Kern M; Wolfart S
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Dec; 19(12):1304-11. PubMed ID: 19040447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. An evaluation of retention and marginal seating of Ni-Cr alloy cast restorations using three different luting cements: an in vitro study.
    Pattanaik BK; Nagda SJ
    Indian J Dent Res; 2012; 23(1):20-5. PubMed ID: 22842244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Retentiveness of various luting agents used with implant-supported prosthesis: an in vitro study.
    Garg P; Pujari M; Prithviraj DR; Khare S
    J Oral Implantol; 2014 Dec; 40(6):649-54. PubMed ID: 25506659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.