339 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24614880)
1. A strain gauge analysis comparing external and internal implant-abutment connections.
Asvanund P
Implant Dent; 2014 Apr; 23(2):206-11. PubMed ID: 24614880
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Photoelastic stress analysis of external versus internal implant-abutment connections.
Asvanund P; Morgano SM
J Prosthet Dent; 2011 Oct; 106(4):266-71. PubMed ID: 21962585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Biomechanical evaluation of internal and external hexagon platform switched implant-abutment connections: An in vitro laboratory and three-dimensional finite element analysis.
Freitas-Júnior AC; Rocha EP; Bonfante EA; Almeida EO; Anchieta RB; Martini AP; Assunção WG; Silva NR; Coelho PG
Dent Mater; 2012 Oct; 28(10):e218-28. PubMed ID: 22682782
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Bending moments of zirconia and titanium implant abutments supporting all-ceramic crowns after aging.
Mühlemann S; Truninger TC; Stawarczyk B; Hämmerle CH; Sailer I
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2014 Jan; 25(1):74-81. PubMed ID: 23735182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effect of platform connection and abutment material on stress distribution in single anterior implant-supported restorations: a nonlinear 3-dimensional finite element analysis.
Carvalho MA; Sotto-Maior BS; Del Bel Cury AA; Pessanha Henriques GE
J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Nov; 112(5):1096-102. PubMed ID: 24831744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Axial loads on implant-supported partial fixed prostheses for external and internal hex connections and machined and plastic copings: strain gauge analysis.
de Vasconcellos LG; Kojima AN; Nishioka RS; de Vasconcellos LM; Balducci I
J Oral Implantol; 2015 Apr; 41(2):149-54. PubMed ID: 23574373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Influence of Connection Types and Implant Number on the Biomechanical Behavior of Mandibular Full-Arch Rehabilitation.
Sousa RM; Simamoto-Junior PC; Fernandes-Neto AJ; Sloten JV; Jaecques SV; Pessoa RS
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2016; 31(4):750-60. PubMed ID: 27447140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Regular and platform switching: bone stress analysis varying implant type.
Gurgel-Juarez NC; de Almeida EO; Rocha EP; Freitas AC; Anchieta RB; de Vargas LC; Kina S; França FM
J Prosthodont; 2012 Apr; 21(3):160-6. PubMed ID: 22372756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of fracture resistance of pressable metal ceramic custom implant abutment with a commercially fabricated CAD/CAM zirconia implant abutment.
Protopapadaki M; Monaco EA; Kim HI; Davis EL
J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Nov; 110(5):389-96. PubMed ID: 24011801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Influences of internal tapered abutment designs on bone stresses around a dental implant: three-dimensional finite element method with statistical evaluation.
Chu CM; Huang HL; Hsu JT; Fuh LJ
J Periodontol; 2012 Jan; 83(1):111-8. PubMed ID: 21563947
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. In vitro assessment of three types of zirconia implant abutments under static load.
Kim JS; Raigrodski AJ; Flinn BD; Rubenstein JE; Chung KH; Mancl LA
J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Apr; 109(4):255-63. PubMed ID: 23566607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Dynamic fatigue properties of the dental implant-abutment interface: joint opening in wide-diameter versus standard-diameter hex-type implants.
Hoyer SA; Stanford CM; Buranadham S; Fridrich T; Wagner J; Gratton D
J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Jun; 85(6):599-607. PubMed ID: 11404760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Deformation of implant abutments after framework connection using strain gauges.
Hollweg H; Jacques LB; da Silva Moura M; Bianco VC; Souza EA; Rubo JH
J Oral Implantol; 2012 Apr; 38(2):125-32. PubMed ID: 22568468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Bending moments of zirconia and titanium abutments with internal and external implant-abutment connections after aging and chewing simulation.
Truninger TC; Stawarczyk B; Leutert CR; Sailer TR; Hämmerle CH; Sailer I
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2012 Jan; 23(1):12-8. PubMed ID: 21443610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Fracture strength of implant abutments after fatigue testing: A systematic review and a meta-analysis.
Coray R; Zeltner M; Özcan M
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2016 Sep; 62():333-346. PubMed ID: 27239815
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The influence of stiffness of implant-abutment connection on load-deflection ratios of a screw-retained stiff cantilever beam. 3-D measurements in vitro.
Cassel B; Lundgren D; Karlsson D
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2013 Nov; 24(11):1251-6. PubMed ID: 22906410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Leakage of saliva through the implant-abutment interface: in vitro evaluation of three different implant connections under unloaded and loaded conditions.
do Nascimento C; Miani PK; Pedrazzi V; Gonçalves RB; Ribeiro RF; Faria AC; Macedo AP; de Albuquerque RF
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2012; 27(3):551-60. PubMed ID: 22616048
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. In vitro analysis of resistance to cyclic load and preload distribution of two implant/abutment screwed connections.
Murmura G; Di Iorio D; Cicchetti AR; Sinjari B; Caputi S
J Oral Implantol; 2013 Jun; 39(3):293-301. PubMed ID: 21231867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. An in vitro pilot study of abutment stability during loading in new and fatigue-loaded conical dental implants using synchrotron-based radiography.
Rack T; Zabler S; Rack A; Riesemeier H; Nelson K
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2013; 28(1):44-50. PubMed ID: 23377046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Microbiological assessment of the implant-abutment interface in different connections: cross-sectional study after 5 years of functional loading.
Canullo L; Penarrocha-Oltra D; Soldini C; Mazzocco F; Penarrocha M; Covani U
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2015 Apr; 26(4):426-434. PubMed ID: 24665919
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
