336 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24614880)
21. Bending moments and types of failure of zirconia and titanium abutments with internal implant-abutment connections: a laboratory study.
Leutert CR; Stawarczyk B; Truninger TC; Hämmerle CH; Sailer I
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2012; 27(3):505-12. PubMed ID: 22616042
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Load fatigue performance of conical implant-abutment connections.
Seetoh YL; Tan KB; Chua EK; Quek HC; Nicholls JI
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(4):797-806. PubMed ID: 21841990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Axial displacements in external and internal implant-abutment connection.
Lee JH; Kim DG; Park CJ; Cho LR
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2014 Feb; 25(2):e83-9. PubMed ID: 23088616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. In vitro differences of stress concentrations for internal and external hex implant-abutment connections: a short communication.
Maeda Y; Satoh T; Sogo M
J Oral Rehabil; 2006 Jan; 33(1):75-8. PubMed ID: 16409521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Biomechanical in vitro evaluation of two full-arch rehabilitations supported by four or five implants.
Francetti L; Cavalli N; Villa T; La Barbera L; Taschieri S; Corbella S; Del Fabbro M
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2015; 30(2):419-26. PubMed ID: 25830403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. An evaluation of new designs in implant-abutment connections: a finite element method assessment.
Covani U; Ricci M; Tonelli P; Barone A
Implant Dent; 2013 Jun; 22(3):263-7. PubMed ID: 23619750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Settling of abutments into implants and changes in removal torque in five different implant-abutment connections. Part 1: Cyclic loading.
Kim KS; Han JS; Lim YJ
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2014; 29(5):1079-84. PubMed ID: 25216133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Straight and offset implant placement under axial and nonaxial loads in implant-supported prostheses: strain gauge analysis.
Abreu CW; Nishioka RS; Balducci I; Consani RL
J Prosthodont; 2012 Oct; 21(7):535-9. PubMed ID: 22905920
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Stress distribution in implant-supported prosthesis with external and internal implant-abutment connections.
Coelho Goiato M; Pesqueira AA; Falcón-Antenucci RM; Dos Santos DM; Haddad MF; Bannwart LC; Moreno A
Acta Odontol Scand; 2013 Mar; 71(2):283-8. PubMed ID: 22486241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Effects of abutment screw preload in two implant connection systems: A 3D finite element study.
Jung WK; Lee WS; Kwon HB
J Prosthet Dent; 2019 Nov; 122(5):474.e1-474.e8. PubMed ID: 31590980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. The dynamic natures of implant loading.
Wang RF; Kang B; Lang LA; Razzoog ME
J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Jun; 101(6):359-71. PubMed ID: 19463663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Cyclic loading of implant-supported prostheses: comparison of gaps at the prosthetic-abutment interface when cycled abutments are replaced with as-manufactured abutments.
Hecker DM; Eckert SE; Choi YG
J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Jan; 95(1):26-32. PubMed ID: 16399272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Comparison of non-linear finite element stress analysis with in vitro strain gauge measurements on a Morse taper implant.
Iplikçioğlu H; Akça K; Cehreli MC; Sahin S
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2003; 18(2):258-65. PubMed ID: 12705305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. In vitro study of the influence of the type of connection on the fracture load of zirconia abutments with internal and external implant-abutment connections.
Sailer I; Sailer T; Stawarczyk B; Jung RE; Hämmerle CH
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(5):850-8. PubMed ID: 19865625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Effect of Implant Connection Type and Depth on the Seating Accuracy of Hand-Tightened Abutments.
Siadat H; Belbasi S; Alikhasi M; Nazari V; Beyabanaki E
J Prosthodont; 2019 Feb; 28(2):e661-e665. PubMed ID: 29239053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Effect of implant-abutment connection design on load bearing capacity and failure mode of implants.
Dittmer S; Dittmer MP; Kohorst P; Jendras M; Borchers L; Stiesch M
J Prosthodont; 2011 Oct; 20(7):510-6. PubMed ID: 21910778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Influence of implant abutment type on stress distribution in bone under various loading conditions using finite element analysis.
Chun HJ; Shin HS; Han CH; Lee SH
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2006; 21(2):195-202. PubMed ID: 16634489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Characteristics of implant-CAD/CAM abutment connections of two different internal connection systems.
Sumi T; Braian M; Shimada A; Shibata N; Takeshita K; Vandeweghe S; Coelho PG; Wennerberg A; Jimbo R
J Oral Rehabil; 2012 May; 39(5):391-8. PubMed ID: 22175784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Biomechanical evaluation of platform switching: different mismatch sizes, connection types, and implant protocols.
Pessoa RS; Bezerra FJ; Sousa RM; Vander Sloten J; Casati MZ; Jaecques SV
J Periodontol; 2014 Sep; 85(9):1161-71. PubMed ID: 24635544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Fracture resistance of titanium and zirconia abutments: an in vitro study.
Foong JK; Judge RB; Palamara JE; Swain MV
J Prosthet Dent; 2013 May; 109(5):304-12. PubMed ID: 23684280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
