BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

112 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24614882)

  • 1. 'Reliability of 2 implant stability measuring methods in assessment of various periimplant bone loss: an in vitro study with the Periotest and Osstell Mentor.”.
    Sabour S
    Implant Dent; 2014 Apr; 23(2):104. PubMed ID: 24614882
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Reliability of 2 implant stability measuring methods in assessment of various periimplant bone loss: an in vitro study with the Periotest and Osstell Mentor.
    Choi HH; Chung CH; Kim SG; Son MK
    Implant Dent; 2014 Feb; 23(1):51-6. PubMed ID: 24398847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Reply: To PMID 24398847.
    Son MK
    Implant Dent; 2014 Apr; 23(2):105. PubMed ID: 24614883
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Resonance frequency analysis and damping capacity assessment. Part 2: peri-implant bone loss follow-up. An in vitro study with the Periotest and Osstell instruments.
    Lachmann S; Laval JY; Jäger B; Axmann D; Gomez-Roman G; Groten M; Weber H
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2006 Feb; 17(1):80-4. PubMed ID: 16441788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation of the Periotest as a diagnostic tool for dental implants.
    Cranin AN; DeGrado J; Kaufman M; Baraoidan M; DiGregorio R; Batgitis G; Lee Z
    J Oral Implantol; 1998; 24(3):139-46. PubMed ID: 9893520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Clinical study of the relationship between implant stability measurements using Periotest and Osstell mentor and bone quality assessment.
    Oh JS; Kim SG
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2012 Mar; 113(3):e35-40. PubMed ID: 22669155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Parameters of implant stability measurements based on resonance frequency and damping capacity: a comparative finite element analysis.
    Winter W; Möhrle S; Holst S; Karl M
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010; 25(3):532-9. PubMed ID: 20556252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A comparative study of two noninvasive techniques to evaluate implant stability: Periotest and Osstell Mentor.
    Oh JS; Kim SG; Lim SC; Ong JL
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2009 Apr; 107(4):513-8. PubMed ID: 19095473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Influence of implant geometry on primary insertion stability and simulated peri-implant bone loss: an in vitro study using resonance frequency analysis and damping capacity assessment.
    Lachmann S; Laval JY; Axmann D; Weber H
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(2):347-55. PubMed ID: 21483888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Influence of bony defects on implant stability.
    Merheb J; Coucke W; Jacobs R; Naert I; Quirynen M
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2010 Sep; 21(9):919-23. PubMed ID: 20491838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparative analysis of 2 resonance frequency measurement devices: Osstell Mentor and Osstell ISQ.
    Jaramillo R; Santos R; Lázaro P; Romero M; Rios-Santos JV; Bullón P; Fernández-Palacín A; Herrero-Climent M
    Implant Dent; 2014 Jun; 23(3):351-6. PubMed ID: 24776942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Measurement of dental implant stability by resonance frequency analysis and damping capacity assessment: comparison of both techniques in a clinical trial.
    Zix J; Hug S; Kessler-Liechti G; Mericske-Stern R
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(3):525-30. PubMed ID: 18700378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A comparative study of the Osstell™ versus the Osstell Mentor™ to evaluate implant stability in human cadaver mandibles.
    Snijders RS; van Wijk AJ; Lindeboom JA
    J Oral Rehabil; 2013 Oct; 40(10):774-9. PubMed ID: 23981012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Predictors of peri-implant bone loss during long-term maintenance of patients treated with 10-mm implants and single crown restorations.
    De la Rosa M; Rodríguez A; Sierra K; Mendoza G; Chambrone L
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2013; 28(3):798-802. PubMed ID: 23748311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Mobility assessment with the Periotest system in relation to histologic findings of oral implants.
    Isidor F
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1998; 13(3):377-83. PubMed ID: 9638008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Resonance frequency analysis and damping capacity assessment. Part I: an in vitro study on measurement reliability and a method of comparison in the determination of primary dental implant stability.
    Lachmann S; Jäger B; Axmann D; Gomez-Roman G; Groten M; Weber H
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2006 Feb; 17(1):75-9. PubMed ID: 16441787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Relationship between dental implant stability determined by resonance frequency analysis measurements and peri-implant vertical defects: an in vitro study.
    Tözüm TF; Turkyilmaz I; McGlumphy EA
    J Oral Rehabil; 2008 Oct; 35(10):739-44. PubMed ID: 18422511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Osstell Mentor: measuring dental implant stability at placement, before loading, and after loading.
    Garg AK
    Dent Implantol Update; 2007 Jul; 18(7):49-53. PubMed ID: 17633439
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effect of occlusal wear on bone loss and Periotest value of dental implants.
    Engel E; Gomez-Roman G; Axmann-Krcmar D
    Int J Prosthodont; 2001; 14(5):444-50. PubMed ID: 12066640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Influence of the size of the microgap on crestal bone levels in non-submerged dental implants: a radiographic study in the canine mandible.
    King GN; Hermann JS; Schoolfield JD; Buser D; Cochran DL
    J Periodontol; 2002 Oct; 73(10):1111-7. PubMed ID: 12416767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.