BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24614883)

  • 1. Reply: To PMID 24398847.
    Son MK
    Implant Dent; 2014 Apr; 23(2):105. PubMed ID: 24614883
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. 'Reliability of 2 implant stability measuring methods in assessment of various periimplant bone loss: an in vitro study with the Periotest and Osstell Mentor.”.
    Sabour S
    Implant Dent; 2014 Apr; 23(2):104. PubMed ID: 24614882
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Reliability of 2 implant stability measuring methods in assessment of various periimplant bone loss: an in vitro study with the Periotest and Osstell Mentor.
    Choi HH; Chung CH; Kim SG; Son MK
    Implant Dent; 2014 Feb; 23(1):51-6. PubMed ID: 24398847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Bone levels using different methods of abutment connection.
    Otto M; Gluckman H
    SADJ; 2008 Mar; 63(2):118, 120. PubMed ID: 18561814
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Predictors of peri-implant bone loss during long-term maintenance of patients treated with 10-mm implants and single crown restorations.
    De la Rosa M; Rodríguez A; Sierra K; Mendoza G; Chambrone L
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2013; 28(3):798-802. PubMed ID: 23748311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Success of implants in the moderately resorbed edentate maxilla].
    Naert IE
    Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd; 1997 Jul; 104(7):251-2. PubMed ID: 11924399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of the Periotest as a diagnostic tool for dental implants.
    Cranin AN; DeGrado J; Kaufman M; Baraoidan M; DiGregorio R; Batgitis G; Lee Z
    J Oral Implantol; 1998; 24(3):139-46. PubMed ID: 9893520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Clinical criteria for determining implant success: bone.
    Chaytor DV
    Int J Prosthodont; 1993; 6(2):145-52. PubMed ID: 8329091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Development and manufacture of prosthodontic components: do we need changes?
    Watson PA
    Int J Prosthodont; 1998; 11(5):513-6. PubMed ID: 9922742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Influence of the size of the microgap on crestal bone levels in non-submerged dental implants: a radiographic study in the canine mandible.
    King GN; Hermann JS; Schoolfield JD; Buser D; Cochran DL
    J Periodontol; 2002 Oct; 73(10):1111-7. PubMed ID: 12416767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Relationship between dental implant stability determined by resonance frequency analysis measurements and peri-implant vertical defects: an in vitro study.
    Tözüm TF; Turkyilmaz I; McGlumphy EA
    J Oral Rehabil; 2008 Oct; 35(10):739-44. PubMed ID: 18422511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Dental Implant Thread Design and the Consequences on Long-Term Marginal Bone Loss.
    Ormianer Z; Matalon S; Block J; Kohen J
    Implant Dent; 2016 Aug; 25(4):471-7. PubMed ID: 27455430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Within-subject comparison between connected and nonconnected tooth-to-implant fixed partial prostheses: up to 14-year follow-up study.
    Hosny M; Duyck J; van Steenberghe D; Naert I
    Int J Prosthodont; 2000; 13(4):340-6. PubMed ID: 11203652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects of buccal bi-cortical anchorages on primary stability of dental implants: a numerical approach of natural frequency analysis.
    Wang K; Li DH; Guo JF; Liu BL; Shi SQ
    J Oral Rehabil; 2009 Apr; 36(4):284-91. PubMed ID: 19220714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Prospective evaluation of implants connected to teeth.
    Block MS; Lirette D; Gardiner D; Li L; Finger IM; Hochstedler J; Evans G; Kent JN; Misiek DJ; Mendez AJ; Guerra L; Larsen H; Wood W; Worthington P
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2002; 17(4):473-87. PubMed ID: 12182290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Relationships between implant stability, image-based measures and nitric oxide levels.
    Güncü GN; Tözüm TF; Güncü MB; Yamalik N
    J Oral Rehabil; 2008 Oct; 35(10):745-53. PubMed ID: 18422510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The influence of early loading on bony crest height and stability: a pilot study.
    Brochu JF; Anderson JD; Zarb GA
    Int J Prosthodont; 2005; 18(6):506-12. PubMed ID: 16335170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Short Dental Implants Retaining Two-Implant Mandibular Overdentures in Very Old, Dependent Patients: Radiologic and Clinical Observation Up to 5 Years.
    Maniewicz S; Buser R; Duvernay E; Vazquez L; Loup A; Perneger TV; Schimmel M; Müller F
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2017; 32(2):415-422. PubMed ID: 28291859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effect of misfit of cement-retained implant single crowns on crestal bone changes.
    Chen CJ; Papaspyridakos P; Guze K; Singh M; Weber HP; Gallucci GO
    Int J Prosthodont; 2013; 26(2):135-7. PubMed ID: 23476906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Preservation of crestal bone: a clinical requisite.
    Baumgarten H
    Pract Proced Aesthet Dent; 2006 Aug; 18(7):431-2. PubMed ID: 17001833
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.