132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24614966)
1. The resurrection of Tweedledum and Tweedledee: bimodality cannot distinguish serial and parallel processes.
Williams P; Eidels A; Townsend JT
Psychon Bull Rev; 2014 Oct; 21(5):1165-73. PubMed ID: 24614966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Can we perceive two colors at the same time? A direct test of Huang and Pashler's (2007) Boolean map theory of visual attention.
Fitousi D
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2019 Jul; 81(5):1532-1550. PubMed ID: 30684206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Parallel perceptual enhancement and hierarchic relevance evaluation in an audio-visual conjunction task.
Potts GF; Wood SM; Kothmann D; Martin LE
Brain Res; 2008 Oct; 1236():126-39. PubMed ID: 18723003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Serial, self-terminating search can be distinguished from others: Evidence from multi-target search data.
Lee J; Jung K; Han SW
Cognition; 2021 Jul; 212():104736. PubMed ID: 33887651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Serial vs. parallel models of attention in visual search: accounting for benchmark RT-distributions.
Moran R; Zehetleitner M; Liesefeld HR; Müller HJ; Usher M
Psychon Bull Rev; 2016 Oct; 23(5):1300-1315. PubMed ID: 26635097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Temporal organization of color and shape processing during visual search.
Glavan JJ; Haggit JM; Houpt JW
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2020 Feb; 82(2):426-456. PubMed ID: 32133598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The McGurk effect: An investigation of attentional capacity employing response times.
Altieri N; Lentz JJ; Townsend JT; Wenger MJ
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2016 Aug; 78(6):1712-27. PubMed ID: 27188651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. When two faces are not better than one: Serial limited-capacity processing with redundant-target faces.
Fitousi D
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2021 Nov; 83(8):3118-3134. PubMed ID: 34180033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Search asymmetries: parallel processing of uncertain sensory information.
Vincent BT
Vision Res; 2011 Aug; 51(15):1741-50. PubMed ID: 21664919
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Redundant target effect and intersensory facilitation from visual-tactile interactions in simple reaction time.
Forster B; Cavina-Pratesi C; Aglioti SM; Berlucchi G
Exp Brain Res; 2002 Apr; 143(4):480-7. PubMed ID: 11914794
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Relative saliency in change signals affects perceptual comparison and decision processes in change detection.
Yang CT
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2011 Dec; 37(6):1708-28. PubMed ID: 21767050
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Composite faces are not (necessarily) processed coactively: A test using systems factorial technology and logical-rule models.
Cheng XJ; McCarthy CJ; Wang TSL; Palmeri TJ; Little DR
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2018 Jun; 44(6):833-862. PubMed ID: 29683707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Visual and central attention share a capacity limitation when the demands for serial item selection in visual search are high.
Reimer CB; Schubert T
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2020 Feb; 82(2):715-728. PubMed ID: 31974939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Serial, covert shifts of attention during visual search are reflected by the frontal eye fields and correlated with population oscillations.
Buschman TJ; Miller EK
Neuron; 2009 Aug; 63(3):386-96. PubMed ID: 19679077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Perceptual basis of redundancy gains in visual pop-out search.
Töllner T; Zehetleitner M; Krummenacher J; Müller HJ
J Cogn Neurosci; 2011 Jan; 23(1):137-50. PubMed ID: 20044891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Response-time tests of logical-rule models of categorization.
Little DR; Nosofsky RM; Denton SE
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2011 Jan; 37(1):1-27. PubMed ID: 21058874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Integrating neuronal coding into cognitive models: predicting reaction time distributions.
Oram MW
Network; 2005 Dec; 16(4):377-400. PubMed ID: 16611591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Differential consequences of orienting attention in parallel and serial search: an ERP study.
Tian Y; Chica AB; Xu P; Yao D
Brain Res; 2011 May; 1391():81-92. PubMed ID: 21458425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Selective attention modulates the effect of target location probability on redundant signal processing.
Chang TY; Little DR; Yang CT
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2016 Aug; 78(6):1603-24. PubMed ID: 27188653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Parallel versus serial processing in visual search: further evidence from subadditive effects of visual quality.
Egeth H; Dagenbach D
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1991 May; 17(2):551-60. PubMed ID: 1830092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
