258 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24615418)
1. Standardized cine-loop documentation in renal ultrasound facilitates skill-mix between radiographer and radiologist.
Gaarder M; Seierstad T; Søreng R; Drolsum A; Begum K; Dormagen JB
Acta Radiol; 2015 Mar; 56(3):368-73. PubMed ID: 24615418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Standardized cine-loop documentation in abdominal ultrasound facilitates offline image interpretation.
Dormagen JB; Gaarder M; Drolsum A
Acta Radiol; 2015 Jan; 56(1):3-9. PubMed ID: 24345769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Radiographer-acquired and radiologist-reviewed ultrasound examination--agreement with radiologist's bedside evaluation.
Stenman C; Thorelius L; Knutsson A; Smedby Ö
Acta Radiol; 2011 Feb; 52(1):70-4. PubMed ID: 21498329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Who should be performing routine abdominal ultrasound? A prospective double-blind study comparing the accuracy of radiologist and radiographer.
Leslie A; Lockyer H; Virjee JP
Clin Radiol; 2000 Aug; 55(8):606-9. PubMed ID: 10964731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Radiographers and radiologists reporting plain radiograph requests from accident and emergency and general practice.
Brealey SD; King DG; Hahn S; Crowe M; Williams P; Rutter P; Crane S
Clin Radiol; 2005 Jun; 60(6):710-7. PubMed ID: 16038699
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Do radiologists agree on findings in radiographer-acquired sonographic examinations?
Stenman C; Jamil S; Thorelius L; Knutsson A; Smedby Ö
J Ultrasound Med; 2013 Mar; 32(3):513-8. PubMed ID: 23443192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. An evaluation of radiographer performed and interpreted barium swallows and meals.
Judson EE; Nightingale JM
Clin Radiol; 2009 Aug; 64(8):807-14. PubMed ID: 19589420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Accuracy of radiographer reporting of paediatric brain CT.
Brandt A; Andronikou S; Wieselthaler N; Louw B; Kilborn T; Dekker G; Bertelsman J; Dreyer C
Pediatr Radiol; 2007 Mar; 37(3):291-6. PubMed ID: 17268779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparing the performance of trained radiographers against experienced radiologists in the UK lung cancer screening (UKLS) trial.
Nair A; Gartland N; Barton B; Jones D; Clements L; Screaton NJ; Holemans JA; Duffy SW; Field JK; Baldwin DR; Hansell DM; Devaraj A
Br J Radiol; 2016 Oct; 89(1066):20160301. PubMed ID: 27461068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Observer agreement in the reporting of knee and lumbar spine magnetic resonance (MR) imaging examinations: selectively trained MR radiographers and consultant radiologists compared with an index radiologist.
Brealey S; Piper K; King D; Bland M; Caddick J; Campbell P; Gibbon A; Highland A; Jenkins N; Petty D; Warren D
Eur J Radiol; 2013 Oct; 82(10):e597-605. PubMed ID: 23791130
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effectiveness of UK radiographer image reading.
Blakeley C; Hogg P; Heywood J
Radiol Technol; 2008; 79(3):221-6. PubMed ID: 18203876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of radiographer/radiologist double film reading with single reading in breast cancer screening.
Pauli R; Hammond S; Cooke J; Ansell J
J Med Screen; 1996; 3(1):18-22. PubMed ID: 8861046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. An audit of a radiographer based ultrasound service.
Weston MJ; Morse A; Slack NF
Br J Radiol; 1994 Jul; 67(799):665-7. PubMed ID: 8062007
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Accuracy of radiographer plain radiograph reporting in clinical practice: a meta-analysis.
Brealey S; Scally A; Hahn S; Thomas N; Godfrey C; Coomarasamy A
Clin Radiol; 2005 Feb; 60(2):232-41. PubMed ID: 15664578
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Inter-observer variability in mammography screening and effect of type and number of readers on screening outcome.
Duijm LE; Louwman MW; Groenewoud JH; van de Poll-Franse LV; Fracheboud J; Coebergh JW
Br J Cancer; 2009 Mar; 100(6):901-7. PubMed ID: 19259088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The impact of trained radiographers as concurrent readers on performance and reading time of experienced radiologists in the UK Lung Cancer Screening (UKLS) trial.
Nair A; Screaton NJ; Holemans JA; Jones D; Clements L; Barton B; Gartland N; Duffy SW; Baldwin DR; Field JK; Hansell DM; Devaraj A
Eur Radiol; 2018 Jan; 28(1):226-234. PubMed ID: 28643093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Radiographer commenting of trauma radiographs: a survey of the benefits, barriers and enablers to participation in an Australian healthcare setting.
Neep MJ; Steffens T; Owen R; McPhail SM
J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol; 2014 Aug; 58(4):431-8. PubMed ID: 24774619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The influence of a continuing education program on the image interpretation accuracy of rural radiographers.
Smith TN; Traise P; Cook A
Rural Remote Health; 2009; 9(2):1145. PubMed ID: 19392573
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Agreement between expert thoracic radiologists and the chest radiograph reports provided by consultant radiologists and reporting radiographers in clinical practice: Review of a single clinical site.
Woznitza N; Piper K; Burke S; Ellis S; Bothamley G
Radiography (Lond); 2018 Aug; 24(3):234-239. PubMed ID: 29976336
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Does the experience level of the radiologist, assessment in consensus, or the addition of the abduction and external rotation view improve the diagnostic reproducibility and accuracy of MRA of the shoulder?
van Grinsven S; Hagenmaier F; van Loon CJ; van Gorp MJ; van Kints MJ; van Kampen A
Clin Radiol; 2014 Nov; 69(11):1157-64. PubMed ID: 25218253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
