143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24615511)
1. MR imaging in the characterization of small renal masses.
Willatt JM; Hussain HK; Chong S; Kappil M; Azar SF; Liu PS; Ruma JA; Elsayes KM
Abdom Imaging; 2014 Aug; 39(4):761-9. PubMed ID: 24615511
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Renal masses: quantitative analysis of enhancement with signal intensity measurements versus qualitative analysis of enhancement with image subtraction for diagnosing malignancy at MR imaging.
Hecht EM; Israel GM; Krinsky GA; Hahn WY; Kim DC; Belitskaya-Levy I; Lee VS
Radiology; 2004 Aug; 232(2):373-8. PubMed ID: 15215544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Assessment of combination of contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging and positron emission tomography/computed tomography for evaluation of ovarian masses.
Tsuboyama T; Tatsumi M; Onishi H; Nakamoto A; Kim T; Hori M; Sakane M; Hori Y; Morii E; Hatazawa J; Tomiyama N
Invest Radiol; 2014 Aug; 49(8):524-31. PubMed ID: 24637584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation of malignant and benign renal lesions using diffusion-weighted MRI with multiple b values.
Erbay G; Koc Z; Karadeli E; Kuzgunbay B; Goren MR; Bal N
Acta Radiol; 2012 Apr; 53(3):359-65. PubMed ID: 22334870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Accuracy of Contrast-enhanced US for Differentiating Benign from Malignant Solid Small Renal Masses.
Atri M; Tabatabaeifar L; Jang HJ; Finelli A; Moshonov H; Jewett M
Radiology; 2015 Sep; 276(3):900-8. PubMed ID: 25919803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effectiveness of MR imaging in characterizing small hepatic lesions: routine versus expert interpretation.
Mueller GC; Hussain HK; Carlos RC; Nghiem HV; Francis IR
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2003 Mar; 180(3):673-80. PubMed ID: 12591673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Complex adnexal masses: detection and characterization with MR imaging--multivariate analysis.
Hricak H; Chen M; Coakley FV; Kinkel K; Yu KK; Sica G; Bacchetti P; Powell CB
Radiology; 2000 Jan; 214(1):39-46. PubMed ID: 10644099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Characterization of adnexal masses using feature analysis at contrast-enhanced helical computed tomography.
Zhang J; Mironov S; Hricak H; Ishill NM; Moskowitz CS; Soslow RA; Chi DS
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2008; 32(4):533-40. PubMed ID: 18664838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Utility of MRI in the Characterization of Indeterminate Small Renal Lesions Previously Seen on Screening CT Scans of Potential Renal Donor Patients.
Fananapazir G; Lamba R; Lewis B; Corwin MT; Naderi S; Troppmann C
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2015 Aug; 205(2):325-30. PubMed ID: 26204282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. T1 hyperintense renal lesions: characterization with diffusion-weighted MR imaging versus contrast-enhanced MR imaging.
Kim S; Jain M; Harris AB; Lee VS; Babb JS; Sigmund EE; Rueff LE; Taouli B
Radiology; 2009 Jun; 251(3):796-807. PubMed ID: 19380690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Exophytic renal masses: angular interface with renal parenchyma for distinguishing benign from malignant lesions at MR imaging.
Verma SK; Mitchell DG; Yang R; Roth CG; O'Kane P; Verma M; Parker L
Radiology; 2010 May; 255(2):501-7. PubMed ID: 20160001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Complex renal cysts: findings on MR imaging.
Balci NC; Semelka RC; Patt RH; Dubois D; Freeman JA; Gomez-Caminero A; Woosley JT
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1999 Jun; 172(6):1495-500. PubMed ID: 10350279
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Enhancing component on CT to predict malignancy in cystic renal masses and interobserver agreement of different CT features.
Benjaminov O; Atri M; O'Malley M; Lobo K; Tomlinson G
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2006 Mar; 186(3):665-72. PubMed ID: 16498093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Differentiation of malignant from benign focal splenic lesions: added value of diffusion-weighted MRI.
Jang KM; Kim SH; Hwang J; Lee SJ; Kang TW; Lee MW; Choi D
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2014 Oct; 203(4):803-12. PubMed ID: 25247945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Is gadolinium necessary for MRI follow-up evaluation of cystic lesions in the pancreas? Preliminary results.
Macari M; Lee T; Kim S; Jacobs S; Megibow AJ; Hajdu C; Babb J
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2009 Jan; 192(1):159-64. PubMed ID: 19098196
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. T2-weighted MR imaging in the assessment of cirrhotic liver.
Hussain HK; Syed I; Nghiem HV; Johnson TD; Carlos RC; Weadock WJ; Francis IR
Radiology; 2004 Mar; 230(3):637-44. PubMed ID: 14739306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Indeterminate liver and renal lesions: comparison of computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging in providing a definitive diagnosis and impact on recommendations for additional imaging.
Margolis NE; Shaver CM; Rosenkrantz AB
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2013; 37(6):882-6. PubMed ID: 24270109
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Gadoxetic acid-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging for differentiating small hepatocellular carcinomas (< or =2 cm in diameter) from arterial enhancing pseudolesions: special emphasis on hepatobiliary phase imaging.
Sun HY; Lee JM; Shin CI; Lee DH; Moon SK; Kim KW; Han JK; Choi BI
Invest Radiol; 2010 Feb; 45(2):96-103. PubMed ID: 20057319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Assessment of dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in the differentiation of malignant from benign orbital masses.
Yuan Y; Kuai XP; Chen XS; Tao XF
Eur J Radiol; 2013 Sep; 82(9):1506-11. PubMed ID: 23561057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Distinction between benign and malignant adrenal masses: value of T1-weighted chemical-shift MR imaging.
Outwater EK; Siegelman ES; Radecki PD; Piccoli CW; Mitchell DG
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 Sep; 165(3):579-83. PubMed ID: 7645474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
